Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

CHURCH, Category, and Speciation

Jakob Karl Rinderknecht
Published Online: 2018-01-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0004

Abstract

The Roman Catholic definition of “church”, especially as applied to groups of Protestant Christians, creates a number of well-known difficulties. The similarly complex category, “species,” provides a model for applying this term so as to neither lose the centrality of certain examples nor draw a hard boundary to rule out border cases. In this way, it can help us to more adequately apply the complex ecclesiology of the Second Vatican Council. This article draws parallels between the understanding of speciation and categorization and the definition of Church since the council. In doing so, it applies the work of cognitive linguists, including George Lakoff, Zoltan Kovecses, Giles Fauconnier and Mark Turner on categorization. We tend to think of categories as containers into which we sort objects according to essential criteria. However, categories are actually built inductively by making associations between objects. This means that natural categories, including species, are more porous than we assume, but nevertheless bear real meaning about the natural world. Taxonomists dispute the border between “zebras” and “wild asses,” but this distinction arises out of genetic and evolutionary reality; it is not merely arbitrary. Genetic descriptions of species has also led recently to the conviction that there are four species of giraffe, not one. This engagement will ground a vantage point from which the Council‘s complex ecclesiology can be more easily described so as to authentically integrate its noncompetitive vision vis-a-vis other Christians with its sense of the unique place held by Catholic Church.

Keywords : Ecclesiology; Second Vatican Council; Ecumenism; Categories; Speciation; cognitive linguistics; Roman Catholic Theology

References

  • Aitchison, Jean. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Robert D. and Robert J. Baker. “A Test of the Genetic Species Concept,” Journal of Mammalogy, 82, no. 4 (November, 2006): 960-73.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Robert D. and Robert J. Baker. “Speciation in Mammals and the Genetic Species Concept,” Journal of Mammalogy, 87, no. 4 (August, 2006): 643-662.Google Scholar

  • Barsalou, Lawrence W. “Ad Hoc Categories,” Memory & Cognition 11, no. 3 (1983), 211-27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Becker, Karl J. “On the Meaning of Subsistit In.” Origins, 35.31 (January 19, 2006): 514-22.Google Scholar

  • Bellarmine, Robert Cardinal. De controversiis, tom. 2, liber 3, De ecclesia militante. Naples: Guiliano, 1857. Available at: https://goo.gl/QqHmavGoogle Scholar

  • Benedict XV, Pope. Codex Iuris Canonici. New York: Kennedy & Sons, 1918.Google Scholar

  • Berlin, Brent. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Bradley, Robert D., and Robert J. Baker. “A Test of the Genetic Species Concept: Cytochrome-b Sequences and Mammals.” Journal of Mammalogy 82, no. 4 (2001): 960-73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, Robert D., and Robert J. Baker. “Speciation in Mammals and The Genetic Species Concept.” Journal of Mammalogy, 87(4), 643-62.Google Scholar

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Declaration, “Mysterium Ecclesiae.” June 24, 1973. Available at: https://goo.gl/s2hY6PGoogle Scholar

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Declaration, “Dominus Iesus: On the Unity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church.” August 6, 2000. Available at: https://goo.gl/64oaUVGoogle Scholar

  • Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. “Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church.” June 29, 2007. Available at: https://goo.gl/ux3R5hGoogle Scholar

  • Duffy, Steven J. The Dynamics of Grace: Perspectives in Theological Anthropology. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Feiner, Johannes. “Decree on Ecumenism: Commentary on the Decree,” In Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II, Herbert Vorgrimler, ed. vol. 2. New York: Herder and Herder, 1968: 57-164.Google Scholar

  • Fennessy, Julian, Tobias Bidon, Friederike Reuss, Vikas Kumar, Paul Elkan, Maria A. Nilsson, Melita Vamberger, Uwe Fritz, and Axel Janke. “Multi-locus Analyses Reveal Four Giraffe Species Instead of One.” Current Biology (2016), 2543-49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gaillardetz, Richard R. An Unfinished Council: Vatican II, Pope Francis, and the Renewal of Catholicism. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Granfield, Patrick. “The Church as Societas Perfecta in the Schemata of Vatican I.” Church History, 48 no 4 (1979): 431-46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Granfield, Patrick. “Churches and Ecclesial Communities.” Josephinum Journal of Theology, 13, no 1 (2006): 32-45.Google Scholar

  • Gros, Jeffrey, Eamon McManus, and Ann Riggs. Introduction to Ecumenism. Manwah: Paulist Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Groves, Colin P. “The Nature of Species: A Rejoinder to Zachos, et al.,” Mammalian Biology 78 (2013): 7-9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Havarti, Katharina, Stephen R. Frost, and Kieran P. McNulty. “Neanderthal taxonomy reconsidered: Implications of 3D primate models of intra- and interspecific differences.” PNAS 101, no. 5 (2003), 1147-1152.Google Scholar

  • Hotchin, John. “Canon Law and Ecumenism: Giving Shape to the Future.” Origins 30, no. 19 (October 19, 2000): 289-98.Google Scholar

  • Br. John of Taizé. “Remarks for the Dignitas Humana Award.” Saint John’s University, Collegeville, MN. October 22, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Walter Cardinal. “The Meaning and Impact of Vatican II’s Ecumenism Decree.” Origins 34, no. 28 (December 23, 2004): 445-50.Google Scholar

  • Kasper, Walter Cardinal. The Catholic Church: Nature, Reality, and Mission. New York: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Kefena, E., Y. Mekasha, J.L. Han, S. Rosenbom, A. Haile, T. Dessie, A. Beja-Pereira. “Discordances Between Morphological Systematics and Molecular Taxonomy in the Stem Line of Equids: A Review of the Case of Taxonomy of Genus Equus.” Livestock Science 143, no. 2-3 (Feb 2012): 105-15.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. Language, Mind and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. Women Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George and Rafel E. Núñez. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Lonergan, Bernard. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Lonergan, Bernard. Method in Theology. New York: Seabury, 1972.Google Scholar

  • Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology After Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters, 2015.Google Scholar

  • McKelvey, Bill. Organizational Systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification. Oakland: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar

  • Nix v. Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893).Google Scholar

  • Pesch, Otto Hermann. The Ecumenical Potential of the Second Vatican Council. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Letter to Dr. Johannes Hanselmann, March 9, 1993. In Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith: The Churches as Communion. Translated by Henry Taylor. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Sanders, John. Theology in the Flesh: How Embodiment and Culture Shape the Way We Think about Truth, Morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sankararaman, Sriram, Swapan Mallick, Michael Dannemann, Kay Prüfer, Janet Kelso, Svante Pääbo, Nick Patterson, and David Reich. “The Genomic Landscape of Neanderthal Ancestry in Present-day Humans.” Nature 507, no. 7492 (2014): 354-7.Google Scholar

  • Schelkens, Karim. “Lumen Gentium’s ‘Subsistit in’ Revisited: The Catholic Church and Christian Unity after Vatican II.” Theological Studies, 69, no. 4 (2008): 875-93.Google Scholar

  • Second Vatican Council. Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, “Lumen Gentium,” November 21, 1964. Translation from Norman P. Tanner, ed., Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1990. II:849-98. (LG)Google Scholar

  • Second Vatican Council. Decree on Ecumenism, “Unitatis Redintegratio.” November 21, 1964. Translation from Tanner, ed., Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils. II:908-22. (UR)Google Scholar

  • Steiner, Cynthia, Anna Mitelberg, Rosanna Tursi, Oliver A. Ryder. “Molecular Phylogeny of Extant Equids and Effects of Ancestral Polymorphism in Resolving Species-Level Phylogenies.” Molecular Phylogenics and Evolution 62, no. 2 (Nov 2012): 573-81.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, Francis A. “A Response to Karl Becker, S.J. on the Meaning of Subsistit In.” Theological Studies 67, no. 2 (2006): 395-409.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, Francis A. “The Meaning of Subsistit In as Explained by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.” Theological Studies, 69, no. 1 (2008): 116-24.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, Francis A. “Further Thoughts on the Meaning of Subsistit In.” Theological Studies 71 no. 1 (2010): 133-147.Google Scholar

  • Sullivan, Francis A. “‘Ecclesial Communities’ and their ‘Defectus Sacramenti Ordinis.’” Ecumenical Trends 39, no. 3 (March 2010): 6-7.Google Scholar

  • Suprema Sacea Congregatio S. Officii, Instruction, “Ecclesia Catholica.” 20. December, 1949. Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 42 (1950), 142-147. Available at https://goo.gl/CLQNBvGoogle Scholar

  • Wijlens, Miriam. Sharing the Eucharist: A Theological Evaluation of Post Conciliar Legislation. New York: University Press of America, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Williams, Rowan. Arius: Heresy and Tradition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Zachos, Frank E., Marco Apollonio, Eva V. Bärmann, Marco Festa-Bianchet, Ursula Göhlich, Jan Christian Habel, Elisabeth Haring, Luise Kruckenhauser, Sandro Lovari, Allan D. McDevitt, Franz Suchentrunk. “Species Inflation and Taxonomic Artefacts - A Critical Comment on Recent Trends in Mammalian Classification.” Mammalian Biology 78 (2013): 1-6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-09-28

Accepted: 2017-12-18

Published Online: 2018-01-17


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 46–59, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0004.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in