Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

CiteScore 2018: 0.37

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.975

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Toward an Earthbound Theology

Austin J. Roberts
Published Online: 2017-12-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0006


This article considers some metaphysical and theological implications of the Anthropocene, which is the proposed name for a new geological epoch that is characterized by massive human disturbances of the Earth system. This stratigraphic time unit concludes the Holocene epoch that offered a relatively stable climate for human civilizations to emerge and flourish. The Anthropocene therefore marks the end of such natural stabilities - both real and imagined - along with a growing awareness of the dynamic agency or subjectivity of the Earth. By magnifying nonhuman subjectivity, the new epoch is widely interpreted by scholars across a range of disciplines as unsettling modern dualistic notions of human exceptionalism. Consequently, nonhuman nature is no longer a relatively inert background for human cultural activities. Humans and nonhumans must now be seen as interrelated Earth subjects. This nonmodern perspective suggests an ecological metaphysics of intersubjectivity along the lines of Alfred North Whitehead’s philosophy of organism, which redistributes subjectivity, creativity, and transcendence throughout nature. Theology in the Anthropocene must therefore account for this nondual view of reality, which arguably implies a divine-world relation characterized by mutual immanence. The proposed earthbound theology ultimately envisions the divine as poetic exemplification of intersubjectivity.

Keywords: Earth system; Gaia; nature; stratigraphy; Alfred North Whitehead; process theology; ecology; environment; nondual; new materialism; climate change; metaphysics


  • Angus, Ian. Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil Capitalism and the Crisis of the Earth System. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Axel, Larry E., and William Dean, eds. The Size of God: The Theology of Bernard Loomer in Context. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Bauman, Whitney. “Climate Weirding and the Queering of Nature.” Religions 6, no. 2 (June 23, 2015): 742-54.Google Scholar

  • Bonneuil, Christophe, and Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Bracken, Joseph A. “Intersubjectivity and the Coming of God.” The Journal of Religion 83, no. 3 (July 2003): 381-400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carrington, Damian. “The Anthropocene Epoch: Scientists Declare Dawn of Human-Influenced Age.” The Guardian, August 29, 2016. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/29/declare-anthropocene-epoch-experts-urge-geologicalcongress- human-impact-earth.Google Scholar

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35, no. 2 (Winter 2009): 197-222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Connolly, William E. Facing the Planetary: Entangled Humanism and the Politics of Swarming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press Books, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Crist, Eileen. “On the Poverty of Our Nomenclature.” Environmental Humanities, 3 (2013): 129-47.Google Scholar

  • Crutzen, Paul. “Geology of Mankind: The Anthropocene.” Nature 415 (January 3, 2002): 23.Google Scholar

  • Crutzen, Paul, and Eugene F. Stoermer. “The ‘Anthropocene.’” IGBP Newsletter 41 (May 2000): 17-18.Google Scholar

  • Davies, Jeremy. The Birth of the Anthropocene. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Deane-Drummond, Celia, Sigurd Bergmann, and Markus Vogt, eds. Religion in the Anthropocene. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Faber, Roland. “In the Wake of False Unifications: Whitehead’s Creative Resistance against Imperialist Theologies.” Claremont, CA, March 31, 2005. http://faber.whiteheadresearch.org/files/FaberR-In_the_Wake_of_False_Unifications.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Faber, Roland. The Divine Manifold. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Ghosh, Amitav. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable (Berlin Family Lectures). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Griffin, David Ray. Reenchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hamilton, Clive. Defiant Earth: The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2017. Kindle Edition.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, Clive, François Gemenne, and Christophe Bonneuil, eds. The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. London; New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, Clive, and Jacques Grinevald. “Was the Anthropocene Anticipated?” The Anthropocene Review 2, no. 1 (2015): 59-72.Google Scholar

  • Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Harman, Graham. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne, Australia: re.press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Keller, Catherine. Cloud of the Impossible: Negative Theology and Planetary Entanglement. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Keller, Catherine. Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Keller, Catherine. Intercarnations: Exercises in Theological Possibility. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Klein, Naomi. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Kolbert, Elizabeth. The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. New York: Henry Holt and Co., 2014.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge, UK ; Medford, MA: Polity, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. Gifford Lectures. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/486.Google Scholar

  • Latour, Bruno. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Morton, Timothy. Humankind: Solidarity with Non-Human People. Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, MN: University Of Minnesota Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Northcott, Michael S. A Political Theology of Climate Change. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2013.Google Scholar

  • Sagan, Dorion, ed. Lynn Margulis: The Life and Legacy of a Scientific Rebel. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Stengers, Isabelle. Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts. Translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014. Google Scholar

  • The Economist. “Welcome to the Anthropocene,” May 26, 2011. http://www.economist.com/node/18744401.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Free Press, 1933.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Modes of Thought. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay In Cosmology. Corrected ed. Gifford Lectures: 1927-28. New York: Free Press, 1929.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Religion In the Making. New York: Fordham University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. New York: Free Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan. The Earth After Us: What Legacy Will Humans Leave in the Rocks? UK: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan, Mark Williams, Alan Smith, Tiffany L. Barry, Angela L. Coe, Paul R. Bown, Patrick Brenchley, David Cantrill, Andrew Gale, Philip Gibbard, F. John Gregory, Mark W. Hounslow, Andrew C. Kerr, Paul Pearson, Robert Knox, John Powell, Colin Waters, John Marshall, Michael Oates, Peter Rawson, Philip Stone. “Are We Now Living in the Anthropocene?” GSA Today 18, no. 2 (February 2008): 4-8.Google Scholar

  • Zalasiewicz, Jan, Mark Williams, Will Steffen, and Paul Crutzen. “The New World of the Anthropocene.” Environmental Science and Technology 44, no. 7 (April 1, 2010): 2228-31.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-11-10

Accepted: 2017-12-29

Published Online: 2017-12-29

Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 71–83, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0006.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in