Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Conceiving God: Literal and Figurative Prompt for a More Tectonic Distinction

Robert Masson
Published Online: 2018-02-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0010

Abstract

John Sanders’ Theology in the Flesh, the first comprehensive overview of the toolkit that contemporary cognitive linguistics offers for theological appropriation, despite its remarkable success, gives rather minimal attention to blending theory, one of the discipline’s most formidable tools. This paper draws on blending theory to offer an alternative to Sanders’ chapter on conceiving God. Central to the proposal is claim that God-talk, like many of the advances in science, technology, and art, entails a kind of tectonic understanding and conceptual mapping that is neither literal nor figurative.

Keywords: God; cognitive linguistics; blending theory; metaphor

References

  • Boeve, Lieven. “Linguistica Ancilla Theologiae: The Interest of Fundamental Theology in Cognitive Systematics.” In The Bible Through Metaphor and Translation: a Cognitive Semantic Perspective, edited by Kurt Feyaerts. New York: Peter Lang, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Hofstadter, Douglas R. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Gerhart, Mary, and Allan Melvin Russell. Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding. Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian UP, 1984.Google Scholar

  • Gerhart, Mary, and Allan Russell. New Maps for Old: Explorations in Science and Religion. New York: Continuum, 2001.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Google Scholar

  • Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology After Cognitive Linguistics. Leuven: Peeters Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Rinderknecht, Jakob Karl. Mapping the Differentiated Consensus of the Joint Declaration. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Sanders, John. Theology in the Flesh: How Embodiment and Culture Shape the Way We Think About Truth, Morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shaver, Stephen. “Metaphors of Eucharistic Presence: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to an Ecumenical Theology of Bread, Wine, and the Body and Blood of Christ.” Graduate Theological Union Berkeley, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Slingerland, Edward G. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Sokolowski, Robert. The God of Faith & Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1982.Google Scholar

  • Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Tremlin, Todd. Minds and Gods: The Cognitive Foundations of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-10-28

Accepted: 2018-02-02

Published Online: 2018-02-17


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 136–157, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0010.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in