Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Freedom from the Self: Luther and Løgstrup on Sin as “Incurvatus in Se”

Bjørn Rabjerg / Robert Stern
Published Online: 2018-07-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0020

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare Martin Luther and K. E. Løgstrup on the theme of sin and grace, and to argue that while Løgstrup wanted to stay close to Luther in many respects, he nonetheless provides a secularized version of Luther’s picture, according to which we are liberated from our sinfulness not by God’s grace, but by our ethical encounter with other people. This then raises the question of whether Løgstrup’s approach can work, and thus whether this secularized alternative can be made stable and coherent. We begin by focusing on central themes concerning Løgstrup’s relation to Luther. We then outline the key features of Luther’s conception of sin and grace that were important to Løgstrup , and then consider how he develops that conception in a secularized manner. Finally, we discuss problems that might be raised for Løgstrup’s position.

Keywords: K. E. Løgstrup; Martin Luther; sin; grace; The Ethical Demand; Iris Murdoch

References

  • Andersen, Svend. Løgstrup & Luther. Aarhus: Klim, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Barone, Marco. Luther’s Augustinian Theology of the Cross. Eugene: Resource Publications, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Gregersen, Niels Henrik, “K. E. Løgstrup and Scandinavian Creation Theology.” In Reformation Theology for a Post-Secular Age: Løgstrup, Prenter, Wingren, and the Future of Scandinavian Creation Theology edited by Niels Henrik Gregersen, Bengt Kristensson Uggla and Trygve Wyller, 37-66. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Jensen, Ole. “‘Skabte livsmuligheder’-‘Suveræne livsytringer’: Bemærkninger til et grundtema hos K. E. Løgstrup.” In his Sårbar Usårlighed: Løgstrup og Religionens Genkomst i Filosofien, 18-34. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1994; translation available here: https://ethicaldemand.wordpress.com/resources-and-link/.Google Scholar

  • Johnston, Mark. Saving God: Religion After Idolatry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Luther, Martin. D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe, 65 vols in 127. Weimar: Hermann Böhlau, 1883- .Google Scholar

  • Luther, Martin. Luther’s Works, American edition, 55 vols. St. Louis and Philadelphia: Concordia and Fortress Press, 1958-86.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. “Antropologien i Kants Etik.” In Festskrift til Jens Nørregaard den 16. Maj 1947, 146-56. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad, 1947.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Beyond the Ethical Demand, translated by Susan Dew and Heidi Flegal, edited with an introduction by Kees van Kooten Niekerk. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Den Etiske Fordring. Aarhus: Klim, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. “Ethics and Ontology”, translated by Eric Watkins. In The Ethical Demand, translated by Theodor I. Jensen and Gary Puckering; revised with an introduction by Hans Fink and Alasdair MacIntyre, 265-93. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. “Ethik und Ontologie.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche. 57 (1960), 357-91.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Etiske Begreber og Problemer. Aarhus: Klim, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Kunst og Etik. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1961.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Metaphysics, volume I, translated by Russell L. Dees. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Opgør med Kierkegaard. Aarhus: Klim, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. “Pligt eller Ansvar.” Kirken og Tiden, 14 (1938), 206-17; translation by Hans Fink and Robert Stern available at: https://ethicaldemand.wordpress.com/resources-and-link/.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Prædikener fra Sandager-Holevad, edited by Elsebeth Diderichsen and Ole Jensen. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. Skabelse og Tilintetgørelse: Metaphysik IV: Religionsfilosofiske Betragtninger. Aarhus: Klim, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. System og Symbol: Essays. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1982.Google Scholar

  • Løgstrup, K. E. “The Anthropology of Kant’s Ethics,” translated by Kees van Kooten Niekerk. In What is Ethically Demanded? Essays on Knud Ejler Løgstrup’s “The Ethical Demand”, edited by Hans Fink and Robert Stern, 19-34. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Murdoch, Iris. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar

  • Rabjerg, Bjørn. “Efterskrift.” In K. E. Løgstrup, Etiske Begreber og Problemer, 121-147. Aarhus: Klim, 2014; translation by BjørnGoogle Scholar

  • Rabjerg and Robert Stern available at: https://ethicaldemand.wordpress.com/resources-and-link/.Google Scholar

  • Rabjerg, Bjørn. “Løgstrup’s Ontological Ethics: An Analysis of Human Interdependent Existence”. Res Cogitans, 17 (2017), 93-110.Google Scholar

  • Rabjerg, Bjørn. Tilværelse og Forståelse: Et Antropologisk Grundtema i Løgstrups Teologiske og Filosofiske tænkning. Aarhus: Klim, 2016.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-05-09

Accepted: 2018-06-04

Published Online: 2018-07-18


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 268–280, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0020.

Export Citation

© 2018 Robert Stern, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in