Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Quantum Mechanics and an Ontology of Intersubjectivity: Perils and Promises

Marc A. Pugliese
Published Online: 2018-08-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0025


Contemporary theology has realized the importance of integrating what we know from the “new physics”-quantum mechanics and relativity theory-into the metaphysical and ontological categories used by theology to consider God, the world, and the God-world relationship. The categories of subjectivity and relationality have risen to prominence in these discussions. Both academic and popular presentations can obscure the vital distinction between what physicists agree on concerning quantum mechanics and the contested interpretation of quantum mechanics, or what quantum mechanics reveals about reality. After (1) summarizing the significant distinction between quantum mechanics per se and the interpretations of quantum mechanics and (2) the agreed upon quantum mechanical experimental procedure and its attendant mathematical formalism, as well as a few of the foremost interpretations, this paper (3) attempts a minimalist culling of some rudimentary but clear ontological principles and categories from what is agreed upon in quantum mechanics, without appeals-tacit or explicit-to one of the many controversial interpretations or to contestable philosophical assumptions and deductions, and these are: experience, subjectivity, relationship, and event. The paper closes by (4) commending one speculative scheme that is especially conducive to developing an interpretation of quantum mechanics consonant with the ontological principles and categories so derived, that of Alfred North Whitehead

Keywords: Metaphysics; Science; Philosophy; Physics; Quantum Theory; Theology; Process Thought; Process Theology; Alfred North Whitehead; Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics


  • Aristotle. Categories.Google Scholar

  • Aristotle. Metaphysics.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Athearn, Daniel. “Physics and Whitehead: An Alternative Approach.” Process Studies, 40:1 (2011), 80-90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagci, G. B. “Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Collapse Theory and Whiteheadian Process Philosophy.” Process Studies, 38:2 (2009), 368-393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bansal, Deepak. “Whitehead’s Cosmology-Process Relational Perspective to Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.” Cosmos & History, 14:1 (2018), 27-39.Google Scholar

  • Bohm, David J. “A New Theory of the Relationship of Mind and Matter.” Journal of the American Society of Psychical Research, 80:2-3 (1986), 113-135.Google Scholar

  • Bohm, David J. “A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables.” Physical Review, 85:2 (1952), 166-179 and 180-193.Google Scholar

  • Bohm, David, and Basil J. Hiley. Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Bohr, Niels. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934; reprint 2011.Google Scholar

  • Bohr, Niels. “Causality and Complementarity.” Philosophy of Science, 4:3 (1937), 289-298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bohr, Niels. Foundations of Quantum Physics II (1933-1958). Volume 7 in Niels Bohr Collected Works, edited by Joegen Kalckar. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., 1996.Google Scholar

  • Bohr, Niels. “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory.” Nature, 121 (Supplement) (April 14, 1928), 580-590.Google Scholar

  • Born, Max. Atomic Physics. New York: Hafner, 1957.Google Scholar

  • Born, Max. The Restless Universe. New York: Dover, 1951.Google Scholar

  • Brogaard, Berit. “In Search of Mentons: Panpsychism, Physicalism, and the Missing Link.” In Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Godehard Br.ntrup and Ludwig Jaskolla, 130-152. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

  • de Broglie, Louis. “La nouvelle dynamique des quanta.” In Électrons et photons: Rapports et discussions du cinquième Conseil de physique tenu à Bruxelles du 24 au 29 octobre 1927 sous les auspices de l’Institut international de physique Solvay, edited by Hendrik Antoon Lorentz, 105-132. Paris: Gauthier-Villars, 1928.Google Scholar

  • Brown, William E. “Quantum Theology: Christianity and the New Physics.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 33:4 (1990), 477-487.Google Scholar

  • Burwell, Jennifer. “Figuring Matter: Quantum Physics as a New Age Rhetoric.” Science as Culture, 22:3 (2013), 344-366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chevalley, Catherine. “Niels Bohr’s Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism.” In Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Volume 153 in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Jan Faye and Henry J. Folse, 33-55. Dordrecht: Springer, 1994.Google Scholar

  • Eastman, Timothy E., and Hank Keeton, editors. Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, Process, and Experience. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Epperson, Michael. Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. New York: Fordham University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Epperson, Michael, and Elias Zafiris. Foundations of Metaphysical Realism: A Topological Approach to Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Nature. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Everett, Hugh, III. “‘Relative State’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 29:3 (1957), 454-462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finkelstein, David Ritz. “Physical Process and Physical Law.” In Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, Process, and Experience. Edited by Timothy E. Eastman and Hank Keeton, 180-186. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Folse, Henry J., Jr. “The Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory and Whitehead’s Philosophy of Organism.” Tulane Studies in Philosophy, 23 (1974), 189-199.Google Scholar

  • Folse, Henry J., Jr. “Niels Bohr, Complementarity, and Realism.” In PSA 1986: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Volume 2, edited by A. Fine and P. Machamer, 96-104. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association, 1987.Google Scholar

  • Folse, Henry J., Jr. “Review of Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, by Michael E. Epperson.” Physics in Perspective, 7:4 (2005): 494-496.Google Scholar

  • Gao, Shan. “A Quantum Physical Argument for Panpsychism.” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20:1-2 (2013), 59-70.Google Scholar

  • Goff, Philip, William Seager, and Sean Allen-Hermanson. “Panpsychism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Spring, 2017. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/panpsychism/>.Google Scholar

  • Goldstein, Sheldon. “Bohmian Mechanics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Spring, 2017. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/qm-bohm/>.Google Scholar

  • Griffin, David Ray. “Bohm and Whitehead on Wholeness, Freedom, Causality, and Time.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 20:2 (1985), 165-191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Griffin, David Ray. Unsnarling the World Knot: Consciousness, Freedom, and the Mind-Body Problem. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Ghirardi, G. C., A. Rimini, and T. Weber. “Unified Dynamics for Microscopic and Macroscopic Systems.” Physical Review, 34D (1986), 470-491.Google Scholar

  • Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York: Harper & Row, 1958.Google Scholar

  • Heisenberg, Werner. “über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik, 43:3-4 (1927), 172-198.Google Scholar

  • Heelan, Patrick. “The Role of Consciousness as Meaning Maker in Science, Culture, and Religion.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 44:2 (2009), 467-486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heitler, Walter. “The Departure from Classical Thought in Modern Physics.” In Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, 179-198. New York: Harper, 1959.Google Scholar

  • Howard, Don. “Who Invented the ‘Copenhagen Interpretation?’ A Study in Mythology.” Philosophy of Science, 71 (2004): 669-682.Google Scholar

  • Kauffman, Stuart. “Beyond the Stalemate: Conscious Mind-Body-Quantum Mechanics-Free Will-Possible Panpsychism- Possible Interpretation of Quantum Enigma.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 10:1 (2014), 149-169.Google Scholar

  • Kauffman, Stuart. “Cosmic Mind?” Theology and Science, 14:1 (2016), 36-47.Google Scholar

  • Landau, L. D., and E. M. Lifshitz. Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory. Volume 3 in Course of Theoretical Physics. Translated by J. B. Sykes and J. S. Bell. 3rd revised edition. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Loewer, Barry. “Consciousness and Quantum Theory: Strange Bedfellows.” In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Quentin Smith and Aleksandar Jokic, 507-524. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • London, Fritz, and Edmond Bauer, 1939. La théorie de l’observation en mécanique quantique, Paris: Hermann; English translation, “The theory of observation in quantum mechanics,” in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by John Archibald Wheeler and Wojciech Hubert Zurek, 217-259. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Malin, Shimon. “Whitehead’s Philosophy and Quantum Physics: A Defense of Nature Loves to Hide.” Process Studies, 31:1 (2002), 17-74.Google Scholar

  • McHenry, Leemon B. “Whitehead, Quantum Mechanics and Local Realism.” Process Studies, 31:1 (2002), 164-170.Google Scholar

  • Mermin, N. David. “Could Feynman Have Said This?” Physics Today, May 4, 2004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mermin, N. David. “Quantum Mysteries for Everyone.” The Journal of Philosophy, 78:7 (1981), 397-408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norsen, Travis, and Sarah Nelson. “Yet Another Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes.” Unpublished Paper (June 18, 2013), 1-11.Google Scholar

  • Osnaghia, Stefano, F.bio Freitas, and Olival Freire, Jr. “The Origin of the Everettian Heresy.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40:2 (2009): 97-123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

  • Polkinghorne, John. Belief in God in an Age of Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Riggan, George A. “Quantum Physics and Freedom in a Whiteheadian Perspective.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 17:3 (1982), 255-265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rozema, Lee A., Ardavan Darabi, Dylan H. Mahler, Alex Hayat, Yasaman Soudagar, and Aephraim M. Steinberg. “Violation of Heisenberg’s Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements.” Physical Review Letters, 109:10 (2012), 1-5.Google Scholar

  • Schlosshauer, Maximilian. “Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 76:4 (2004), 1267-1305.Google Scholar

  • Schlosshauer, Maximilian, Johannes Kofler, and Anton Zeilinger. “A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward Quantum Mechanics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44:3 (2013), 222-230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shimony, Abner. “Quantum Physics and the Philosophy of Whitehead.” In Philosophy in America, edited by Max Black, 240-261. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

  • Schäfer, Lothar. “Quantum Reality, the Emergence of Complex Order from Virtual States, and the Importance of Consciousness in the Universe.” Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 41:3 (2006), 505-532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schlegel, Richard. “The Impossible Spectator in Physics.” The Centennial Review, 19:4 (1975), 217-231.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Quentin. “Why Cognitive Scientists Cannot Ignore Quantum Mechanics.” In Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Quentin Smith and Aleksandar Jokic, 409-446. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Spinoza, Baruch. Ethics. 1677.Google Scholar

  • Stapp, Henry P. Mindful Universe: Quantum Mechanics and the Participating Observer. Berlin: Springer, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Stapp, Henry P. “S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory.” Physical Review D, 3:6 (1971), 1303-1320.Google Scholar

  • Stapp, Henry P. “Whitehead, James, and the Ontology of Quantum Theory.” Mind and Matter, 5:1 (2007), 83-109.Google Scholar

  • Stenger, Victor J. Quantum Gods: Creation, Chaos, and the Search for Quantum Consciousness. New York: Prometheus Books, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Tegmark, Max. “The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Many Worlds or Many Words?” Fortschritte der Physik, 46:6-8 (1998), 855-862.Google Scholar

  • Todd, Peter B. The Individuation of God: Integrating Science and Religion. Asheville, NC: Chiron Publications, 2012.Google Scholar

  • von Neumann, John. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Translated by Robert T. Beyer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955.Google Scholar

  • Wegter-McNelly, Kirk. The Entangled God: Divine Relationality and Quantum Physics. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, John Archibald. “Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links.” Proceedings III International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (1989): 354-358.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Adventures of Ideas. New York: Macmillan, 1933; reprint, Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1920.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected Edition. Edited by David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: Free Press, 1978.Google Scholar

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan, 1925; reprint, Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar

  • Walker, Evan Harris. The Physics Of Consciousness: The Quantum Mind and the Meaning of Life. New York: Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Wigner, Eugene. The Collected Works of Eugene Paul Wigner. Part B. Historical, Philosophical, and Socio-Political Papers. Volume 6: Philosophical Reflections and Syntheses (annotated by Gérard G. Emch), edited by Jagdish Mehra. Berlin: Springer, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Wigner, Eugene. “Remarks on the Mind-Body Problem.” In The Scientist Speculates, edited by Irving John Good, Alan James Mayne, and John Maynard Smith, 284-302. London: Heinemann, 1962.Google Scholar

  • Zeh, H. D. “On the Interpretation of Measurement in Quantum Theory.” Foundations of Physics, 1 (1970), 69-76.Google Scholar

  • Zukav, Gary. The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics. New York: HarperCollins, 2001.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-03-29

Accepted: 2018-08-03

Published Online: 2018-08-25

Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 325–341, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0025.

Export Citation

© by Marc A. Pugliese, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in