Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Illusion of Agency as a Mark of Ultimacy

Hugh Nicholson
Published Online: 2018-09-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0029

Abstract

This essay proposes that action unaccompanied by the usual feeling of conscious agency constitutes a “mark of ultimacy.” Characteristically religious statements of “agentless action” find support in social psychological and cognitive scientific research that calls into question the intuitive belief that conscious thought causes action. An awareness of the limits of our powers of will lies at the the core of those limit experiences that provide the context for the meaningfulness of religious language.

Keywords: Meister Eckhart; Ramana Maharshi; Free Will; Erasmus; Luther; Wegner; New Atheism; limitexperience

References

  • Berger, Peter L., A Rumor of Angels. New York: Anchor Books, 1970.Google Scholar

  • Brunton, Paul. A Search in Secret India. Philadelphia: David McKay, 1934.Google Scholar

  • Collins, Steven. Selfless Persons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

  • Dennett, Daniel C. Breaking the Spell. New York: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Dennett, Daniel C. “Some Observations on the Psychology of Thinking About Free Will.” In Are We Free?, edited by John Baer, James C. Kaufman, and Roy F. Baumeister, 248-259. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Dennett, Daniel C. Elbow Room. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Dupré, Louis, and James A. Wiseman, eds. Light from Light. New York: Paulist Press, 1988.Google Scholar

  • Hacker, Paul. “Distinctive Features of the Doctrine and Terminology of Sankara.” In Philology and Confrontation, edited by Wilhelm Halbfass, 57-100. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Harris, Sam. Free Will. New York: Free Press, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Hohwy, Jakob, and Chris Frith. “Can Neuroscience Explain Consciousness?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 11:7-8 (2004), 180-198.Google Scholar

  • Kaufman, Gordon D. “Transcendence without Mythology.” In God the Problem, 41-71. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

  • Levy, Neil. Consciousness and Moral Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Lillard, Angeline S. “Ethnopsychologies: Cultural variations in theories of mind.” Psychological Bulletin 123: 1 (1998), 3-32.Google Scholar

  • Moore, James W., and Paul C. Fletcher. “Sense of Agency in Health and Disease: A Review of Cue Integration Approaches.” Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2012), 59-68.Google Scholar

  • Moore, James W., Daniel M. Wegner, and Patrick Haggard. “Modulating the Sense of Agency with External Cues.” Consciousness and Cognition 18 (2009), 1056-1064.Google Scholar

  • Nahmias, Eddy. “When Consciousness Matters: a critical review of Daniel Wegner’s The illusion of conscious will,” Philosophical Psychology 15:4 (2002), 527-541.Google Scholar

  • Otto, Rudolf. Mysticism East and West. Translated by Bertha L. Bracey and Richenda C. Payne. New York: Collier Books, 1962.Google Scholar

  • Pinker, Steven. “The Evolutionary Psychology of Religion.” in Where God and Science Meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion, 1-9. Praeger, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Ramana, Maharshi. The Spiritual Teaching of Ramana Maharshi. Boston: Shambala, 1988.Google Scholar

  • Ramsey, Ian T. Religious Language. New York: MacMillan, 1957.Google Scholar

  • Synofzik, Matthis, Gottfried Vosgerau, and Albert Newen. “Beyond the Comparator Model: A Multifactorial Two-Step Account of Agency.” Consciousness and Cognition 17 (2008), 219-239.Google Scholar

  • Tracy, David. Blessed Rage for Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar

  • Wegner, Daniel M. The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Wegner, Daniel M. “Author’s Response: frequently asked questions about conscious will.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:5 (2004), 579-692.Google Scholar

  • Wegner, Daniel M. “Self is Magic.” in Are We Free?, edited by John Baer, James C. Kaufman, and Roy F. Baumeister, 226-247. New York: Oxford, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Winter, Ernst F. (trans. and ed.). Erasmus and Luther: Discourse on Free Will. New York: Continuum, 2002.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-07-02

Accepted: 2018-08-20

Published Online: 2018-09-26

Published in Print: 2018-09-01


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 386–394, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0029.

Export Citation

© by Hugh Nicholson, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in