Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Hermeneutics of Resistance in Marion’s Phenomenology of Givenness

Adrian-Răzvan Șandru
Published Online: 2018-10-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0035

Abstract

My goal in this paper is to investigate the role of the subject in Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology aided by his interpretation of the Kantian categories in ‟Being Given” and ‟In Excess”. I shall relate Marion’s hypothetical saturation of the Kantian categories to the suspension of the I-identity. The inner mechanism of this suspension will be shown to consist in a critical resistance to an excessive intuition that is defined by a failed attempt at the conceptualizing of intuitions. This failure shall manifest the saturated phenomenon as a counter-experience. The critical resistance to an excessive intuition acts as a temporary activity of the subject leading to its role as interpreter inscribed in an infinite hermeneutic. Based on this I argue that Marion’s subject is not destroyed by an excessive intuition but is only called upon to investigate a phenomenon from a multitude of perspectives. I hold this to be of the essence for Marion, as it explains the possibility of interpreting and experiencing the given as a given during the encounter with the given in which both the subject as well as the given become manifest. I shall argue thus that the recourse to Kant further clarifies Marion’s account of a critical, resistant subject. However, this does not mean that I am arguing for Kant’s categories, but that I hold them to have an important explanatory role for Marion’s phenomenology.

Keywords: hermeneutic; resistance; saturation; phenomena; phenomenology; revelation; Marion; Kant

References

  • Alferi, Thomas. “Worüber Hinaus Grösseres Nicht Gegeben Werden Kann ...”: Phänomenologie Und Offenbarung Nach Jean-Luc Marion. Freiburg: Alber, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Alvis, Jason W. Marion and Derrida on the Gift and Desire: Debating the Generosity of Things. Cham: Springer, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Ameriks, Karl. “Kant and the self: a retrospective.” In Figuring the Self. Edited by David Klemm and Günter Zöller. Albany: Suny Press. 55-72, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Baumanns, Peter. “Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B). Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Erster Teil.” In Kant-Studien. 82 (3), 329-348, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Baumanns, Peter. “Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B). Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Zweiter Teil.” In Kant-Studien. 82 (4), 436-455, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Baumanns, Peter. “Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B). Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Dritter Teil.” In Kant-Studien. 83 (1), 60-83, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Baumanns, Peter. “Kants transzendentale Deduktion der reinen Verstandesbegriffe (B). Ein kritischer Forschungsbericht. Vierter Teil.” In Kant-Studien. 83 (2), 185-207, 1992.Google Scholar

  • Berg, Jan. Die theoretische Philosophie Kants. Unter Berücksichtigung der Grundbegriffe seiner Ethik. Stuttgart: frommannholzboog, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Düsing, Klaus. “Constitution and Structure of Self-Identity: Kant’s Theory of Apperception and Hegel’s Criticism”, Midwest Studies In Philosophy; Vol. 8 Issue 1, 409-431, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Faulconer, James E. Transcendence in philosophy and religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (Indiana series in the philosophy of religion), 2003.Google Scholar

  • Fricke, Martin Francisco. “Henrich on Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories.” In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Edited by Valerio Rohden, Ricardo R. Terra, Guido A. de Almeida & Margit Ruffing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 221-232, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Greisch, Jean. “L’herméneutique dans la « phénoménologie comme telle » Trois questions à propos de Réduction et Donation”, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 96e Année, No. 1, A propos de réduction et donation, de Jean-Luc MARION (Janvier-Mars 1991), 43-63.Google Scholar

  • Grondin, Jean. “La tension de la donation ultime et de la pensée herméneutique de l’application chez Jean-Luc Marion.” In Dialogue 38 (03), 547, 1999. DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300046898.Google Scholar

  • Gschwandtner, Christina M. Degrees of Givenness: On Saturation in Jean-Luc Marion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Han, Beatrice. “Transcendence and the Hermeneutic Circle: Some Thoughts on Marion and Heidegger.” In Transcendence in Philosophy and Religion. Edited by Faulconer, James E. Bloomington, IN: Indiana, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Held, Klaus. „Phenomenology of ‚authentic time‘ in Husserl and Heidegger“. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3): 327-347, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Henrich, Dieter. Fichtes Ursprüngliche Einsicht. Klostermann, Frankfurt Am Main, 1967.Google Scholar

  • Henrich, Dieter. Identität und Objektivität. Eine Untersuchung über Kants transzendentale Deduktion; vorgetragen am 9. November 1974. Heidelberg: Winter (Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch- Historische Klasse, 1976,1).Google Scholar

  • Henry, Michel. L’essence de la Manifestation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1963.Google Scholar

  • Henry, Michel. “Destruction ontologique de la critique kantienne du paralogisme de la psychologie rationnelle”. In Studia Phaenomenologica, 9:17-53, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Anthropology, History, and Education. Edited by Günter Zöller, Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg.: Bd. 1-22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin 1900ff.Google Scholar

  • Kaulbach, Friedrich. Immanuel Kant. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1969.Google Scholar

  • Kaulbach, Friedrich. Philosophie als Wissenschaft: eine Anleitung zum Studium von Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft in Vorlesungen. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg, 1981.Google Scholar

  • Kearney, Richard. Debates in continental philosophy. Conversations with contemporary thinkers/Richard Kearney. New York: Fordham University Press; 2004 [London: Eurospan (Perspectives in continental philosophy, 1089-3938, no. 37).Google Scholar

  • Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the “Critique of Pure Reason”. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Mackinlay, Shane. Interpreting excess. Jean-Luc Marion, saturated phenomena, and hermeneutics. New York: Fordham University Press (Perspectives in continental philosophy), 2010.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. Being Given: toward a phenomenology of givenness. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. Givenness and revelation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. God without Being. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. In Excess. Studies of saturated phenomena. New York: Fordham University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. Reduction and givenness. Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and Phenomenology. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. “The Banality of Saturation” in The Visible and the Revealed. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc, and Stephen E. Lewis. The Erotic Phenomenon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Miller, Adam S. Badiou, Marion, and St. Paul. Immanent grace. London: Continuum, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Powell, C. Thomas. Kant’s Theory of Self-Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

  • Puntel, Lorenz B. Sein und Gott. Ein systematischer Ansatz in Auseinandersetzung mit M. Heidegger É. Lévinas und J.-L. Marion. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (Philosophische Untersuchungen, 26), 2010.Google Scholar

  • Sandru, Adrian-Răzvan. “Jean-Luc Marion: Givenness and Revelation [REVIEW].” Phenomenological Reviews, 2016 doi:CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Serban, Claudia. “Jean-Luc Marion als Leser Kants”. in Jean-Luc Marion. Studien zum Werk, Edited by Hanna-Barbara, Gerl-Falkovitz, Dresden: Text & Dialog, 199-215, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Sturma, Dieter. Kant Über Selbstbewusstsein Zum Zusammenhang von Erkenntniskritik Und Theorie des Selbstbewusstseins. G. Olms, 1985.Google Scholar

  • Zarader, Marlene. “Phenomenality and Transcendence” in Transcendence in philosophy and religion. Edited by Faulconer, James E. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press (Indiana series in the philosophy of religion, 106-119, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Zobrist, Marc. Subjekt und Subjektivität in Kants theoretischer Philosophie: eine Untersuchung zu den transzendentalphilosophischen Problemen des Selbstbewusstseins und Daseinsbewusstseins. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-10

Accepted: 2018-08-20

Published Online: 2018-10-18

Published in Print: 2018-10-01


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 450–470, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2018-0035.

Export Citation

© by Adrian-Răzvan Șandru, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in