Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

CiteScore 2018: 0.37

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.975

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Defining Digital Theology: Digital Humanities, Digital Religion and the Particular Work of the CODEC Research Centre and Network

Peter Phillips / Kyle Schiefelbein-Guerrero / Jonas Kurlberg
Published Online: 2019-05-22 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0003

Abstract

This article seeks to define Digital Theology, first by exploring the development of the CODEC Research Centre at Durham University – perhaps the only centre developed to explore Digital Theology. The aims of the centre and some of its projects are explored leading to a discussion of CODEC’s place within Digital Humanities. The article concludes with a focus on different aspects and definitions of Digital Theology.

Keywords: Digital Humanities; Digital Theology; Theology; Computing for Humanities; digital culture; CODEC

References

  • Anderson, Clifford. “Digital Humanities and the Future of Theology.” Cursor: Zeitschrift für explorative Theologie 1 (2018); https://cursor.pubpub.org/pub/anderson-digitalhumanities-2018 [accessed: 10.04.2019].

  • Bamman, David and Gregory Crane. “The Logic and Discovery of Textual Allusion.” Semantic Scholar [web article] url: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Logic-and-Discovery-of-Textual-Allusion-Bamman/491f4b49c0a0c005d769b0d12219fbea5424ea56 [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Berry, David. “Introduction: Understanding the Digital Humanities.” In Understanding Digital Humanities, edited by David Berry, 1–20. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Borgman, Christine. “The Digital Future is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.4 (2009) [web article] url: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Campbell, Heidi, ed. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Heidi and Brian Altenhofen. “Methodological Challenges, Innovations and Growing Pains in Digital Religion Research.” In Digital Methodologies in the Sociology of Religion, edited by Sariya Cheruvallil-Contractor and Suha Shakkour, 1–13. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Heidi and Stephen Garner. Networked Theology: Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Cheong, Pauline Hope, Peter Fischer-Nielsen, Stefan Gelfgren, and Charles Ess, eds. Digital Religion, Social Media and Culture. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Cheruvallil-Contractor, Sariya and Suha Shakkour. Digital Methodologies in the Sociology of Religion. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Clivaz, Claire, Sara Schulthess, and Anastasia Chasapi. “HumaReC: Continuous Data Publishing in the Humanities.” ERCIM News 11, 2017, 21–22 url: https://ercim-news.ercim.eu/images/stories/EN111/EN111-web.pdf [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Clivaz, Claire, Sara Schulthess, and Martial Sankar. “Editing New Testament Arabic Manuscripts in a TEI-base: Fostering Close Reading in Digital Humanities.” Journal of Data Mining and Digital Humanities, Special Issue on Computer-Aided Processing of Intertextuality in Ancient Languages, 2017, 217–235, url: https://jdmdh.episciences.org/paper/view?id=3700 [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Coffee, Neil, Jean-Pierre Koenig, Shakthi Poornima, Christopher Forstall, Roelant Ossewaarde, and S. Jacobson. “The Tesserae Project: Intertextual Analysis of Latin Poetry.” LLC 28 (2011): 221–228.Google Scholar

  • Cooper, Anthony-Paul. “Assessing the Possible Relationship between the Sentiment of Church-Related Tweets and Church Growth.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 46 (2017): 37–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cooper, Anthony-Paul and Daivd Goodhew. “‘Resacralising’ Secular Space: New Churches in a Northern City, 1980–2012.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 32 (2017): 495–511.Google Scholar

  • De Ascaniis, Silvia, Marc-Marie Mutangala, and Lorenzo Cantoni. “ICTs in the Tourism Experience at Religious Heritage Sites: A Review of the Literature and an Investigation of Pilgrims’ Experiences at the Sanctuary of Loreto (Italy).” Church. Communication and Culture 3 (2018): 310–334.Google Scholar

  • Epstein, Mikhael. The Transformative Humanities. New York: Bloomsbury, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Ess, Charles. Digital Media Ethics. London: Polity Press, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Evans, Leighton and Sian Rees. “An Interpretation of Digital Humanities.” In Understanding Digital Humanities, edited by David Berry, 21–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Franzini, Greta, Marco Passarotti, Maria Moritz, and Marco Büchler. “Using and Evaluating TRACER for an Index Fontium Computatus of the Summa contra Gentiles of Thomas Aquinas.” Semantic Scholar [web article] url: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Using-and-Evaluating-TRACER-for-an-Index-Fontium-of-Franzini-Passarotti/4d576231ebf2c12a75cdf9e613dedb6c19980828 [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Fish, Stanley. “The Digital Humanities and the Transcending of Mortality.” http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/09/the-digital-humanities-and-the-transcending-of-mortality/ [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Ford, David, Joshua Mann, and Peter Phillips. The Bible and Digital Millennials. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar

  • Forrest, Benjamin and Mark Lamport. “Modeling Spiritual Formation from a Distance: Paul’s Formation Transactions with the Roman Christians.” Christian Education Journal 3 (2013): 110–124.Google Scholar

  • Grimes, Ronald. Rite out of Place: Ritual, Media, and the Arts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Ellul, Jacques. The Technological Society. London: Jonathan Cape, 1965.Google Scholar

  • Ellul, Jacques and Patrick Troude-Chastenet. Jacques Ellul on Politics, Technology, and Christianity: Conversations with Patrick Troude-Chastenet. Eugene: Wipf and Stock, 2005.Google Scholar

  • Hayles, N. Katherine. How we Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Helland, Christopher. “Scholar’s Top 5: Christopher Helland on Online Religion and Religion Online.” NNMRDC Blog Series, 2012. https://digitalreligion.tamu.edu/blog/mon-05142012-1132/scholar’s-top-5-christopher-helland-online-religion-and-religion-online [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Herzfeld, Noreen. In Our Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Hine, Christine. Ethnography for the Internet. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Hockridge, Diane. “‘What’s the Problem?’ Spiritual Formation in Distance and Online Theological Education.” Journal of Christian Education 54 (2011): 25–38.Google Scholar

  • Horsfield, Peter. “‘Moderate Diversity of Books?’ The Challenge of New Media to the Practice of Christian Theology.” In Digital Religion, edited by Cheong, Pauline, Fischer-Nielsen, Peter, Gelfgren, Stefan and Ess, Charles, 243–258. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Horsfield, Peter. From Jesus to the Internet: A History of Christianity and Media. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Hutchings, Timothy. Creating Church Online. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Lewis, Bex. Raising Children in the Digital Age. London: Lion Hudson, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Lin, Jingjing, Lorenzo Cantoni, and Jamie Murphy. “MOOCs in Tourism and Hospitality: A Review.” Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism 18 (2018): 1–19.Google Scholar

  • Delamarter, Steve. “Theological Educators and their Concerns about Technology.” Teaching Theology and Religion 8 (2005): 131–143.Google Scholar

  • Kyrre-Friis, Jan and Evan Selinger, and Søren Riis, eds. New Waves in the Philosophy of Technology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Liu, Alan. “The Meaning of the Digital Humanities.” PMLA 128 (2013): 409–423.Google Scholar

  • Lowe, Stephen and Mary Lowe. “Spiritual Formation in Theological Distance Education: An Ecosystems Model.” Christian Education Journal Series 3 (2011): 85–102.Google Scholar

  • Mann, Joshua. “The Hermeneutics of Digital Bibles.” In From Scrolls to Scrolling: Sacred Texts, Materiality, and Dynamic Media Cultures, edited by Bradford Anderson. Berlin: De Gruyter, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Mann, Joshua. “Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Religion: Past, Present, and Future.” In Believing in Bits: Digital Media and the Supernatural, edited by Natale, Simone and Pasulka, Diana, n.p. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Mann, Joshua. “Mobile Liturgy: Reflections on the Church of England’s Suite of Digital Apps.” Online - Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet 12.3 (2017)Google Scholar

  • Mann, Joshua. “How Technology Means: Texts, History, and Their Associated Technologies.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 12 (2018) [web article] url: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/12/3/000398/000398.html [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Midson, Scott. Cyborg Theology. London: I.B. Tauris, 2018.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mitchell, Jolyon and Jonas Kurlberg. “Building Peace in View of Digital Violence and Suffering.” In Theologische Medienethik im digitalen Zeitalter, edited by Ulshofer, Gotlind and Wilhelm, Monika, n.p.. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Neville, Robert. “Religious Studies and Theological Studies.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61 (1993): 185–200.Google Scholar

  • Nowviskie, Bethany. “On the Origin of ‘Hack’ and ‘Yack.’” http://nowviskie.org/2014/on-the-origin-of-hack-and-yack/ [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • O’Donnell, Karen. “Performing the imago Dei: Human Enhancement, Artificial Intelligence and Optative Image-Bearing.” International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church 18 (2018): 4–15.Google Scholar

  • O’Donnell, Karen. “Being Corporeal in Digital Spaces.” International Journal of Public Theology, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • O’Donnell, Karen and Scott Midson, eds. “Special Edition on Human Relationships and Digital Technologies.” Journal of Theology and Sexuality, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • O’Donnell, Karen. Digital Theology: Constructing Theology for a Digital Age. London: Bloomsbury, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Ogden, Schubert. “Theology and Religious Studies: Their Difference and the Difference It Makes.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 46 (1978): 3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oord, Thomas, ed. Theologians and Philosophers Using Social Media: Advice, Tips and Testimonials. San Diego: SacraSage, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter. “A Responsive Chorus: The Samaritans of Sychar.” In Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel, edited by Cor Bennema, 292–298. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter. “The Adulterous Woman: Nameless, Partnerless, Defenceless.” In Character Studies in the Fourth Gospel, edited by Cor Bennema, 407–420. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter. “Security and Privacy in a Digital Age.” [web article] url: https://www.academia.edu/38760846/Security_and_Privacy_in_a_Digital_Age_A_Response_to_M34_2013 [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Phillips, Peter. “Wesley’s Parish and the Digital Age.” Holiness 2 (2016): 337–358.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter. Engaging the Word: The Bible and Discipleship. Swindon: BRF, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter. “The Pixelated Text: Reading the Bible within Digital Culture.” Theology 121 (2018): 403–412.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter. “The Power of Visual Culture and the Fragility of the Text.” In Ancient Manuscripts in Digital Culture: Visualisation, Data Mining, Communication, edited David Hamidović, Claire Clivaz, and Sarah Bowen-Savant. Leiden: Brill, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter, Bex Lewis and Kate Bruce. “Digital Communication, the Church and Mission.” [web article] url: http://www.churchgrowthrd.org.uk/UserFiles/File/Resourcing_Mission_Bulletin/June_2013/Digital_Communication_the_Church_and_Mission.pdf [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Phillips, Peter and Richard Briggs. “The Bible as Augmented Reality.” Theology and Ministry Journal 1 (2013), url: http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/theologyandministry/TheologyandMinistry1_2.pdf [accessed: 28.03.2019].

  • Pink, Sarah, Heather Horst, John Postill, Larissa Hjorth, Tania Lewis, and Jo Tacchi, eds. Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practices. London: Sage, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Presner, Tom, ed. Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0. http://www.humanitiesblast.com/manifesto/Manifesto_V2.pdf [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Rose, Marika. “Machines of Loving Grace: Angels, Cyborgs, and Postsecular Labour.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 16 (2017): 240–259.Google Scholar

  • Rose, Marika. “‘It’s Not the Money but the Love of Money That Is the Root of All Evil.” Religions 7 (2016): 1–12.Google Scholar

  • Schiefelbein-Guerrero, Kyle, “Educational Technology at the GTU and Beyond.” Currents (2016): 13–15.Google Scholar

  • Schiefelbein-Guerrero, Kyle. “Neighbor-Care in the Social Network: Rethinking Pastoral Care for the Digital Age.” Paper presented at the Ecclesial Practices Unit of the American Academy of Religion, Denver, CO, November 2018.Google Scholar

  • Stommel, Jesse, “Digital Humanities is about Breaking Stuff.” http://hybridpedagogy.org/the-digital-humanities-is-about-breaking-stuff/ [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Stoddart, Eric. The Common Gaze: Surveillance and the Common Good. London: SCM Press, 2019.Google Scholar

  • Terras, Melissa. “Peering Inside the Big Tent.” In Defining Digital Humanities, edited by Melissa Terras, Julianne Nyhan, and Edward Vanhoutte, 263–270. Defining Digital Humanities. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar

  • Thomson, Iain. “Understanding Technology Ontotheologically.” In New Waves in the Philosophy of Technology, edited by Jan Kyrre-Friis, Evan Selinger, and Søren Riis, 149–166. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Ulshofer, Gotlind and Monika Wilhelm, eds. Theologische Medienethik im digitalen Zeitalter. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, forthcoming.Google Scholar

  • Vestberg, Hans. “Why we Need both Science and Humanities for a Fourth Industrial Revolution Education.” World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/why-we-need-both-science-and-humanities-for-a-fourth-industrial-revolution-education/ [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Vestberg, Hans, “Silicon Valley Esalen Institute.” NY Times https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/04/technology/silicon-valley-esalen-institute.html [accessed: 25.03.2019].

  • Warwick, Claire, Simon Mahoney, Julianne Nyhan, and Claire Bailey Ross. “UCLDH: Big Tent Digital Humanities in Practice.” Digital Humanities 2011 Conference Abstracts, 387-389. Standford: Standford University Library.Google Scholar

  • Waters, Brent. From Human to Posthuman. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Wheeler, Dale. “Push-button Bibles: How to Compare Computer Software for Bible Research.” Christianity Today 34 (1990): 3–13.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-02-04

Accepted: 2019-03-21

Published Online: 2019-05-22


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 29–43, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0003.

Export Citation

© 2019 Peter Phillips et al., published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Claire Clivaz and Garrick V. Allen
Open Theology, 2019, Volume 5, Number 1, Page 461

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in