Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

CiteScore 2018: 0.37

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.975

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Phenomenology of Sacrifice in Marion, Patočka and Nancy

Petr Kouba
Published Online: 2019-10-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0027

Abstract

The phenomenon of sacrifice has been analyzed by Hegel, Kierkegaard, Bataille and many other philosophers. In my paper I intend to examine this phenomenon from the phenomenological point of view as outlined by Jan Patočka, Jean-Luc Nancy and Jean-Luc Marion. With their help I differentiate several kinds of sacrifice (strategic, moral, political, and religious), but above all, I am interested in the limits of sacrifice. Provided that the fields of morality, politics and religion are opened by sacrifice, is there any morality, politics and religion without one? And if so, what is the meaning of morality, politics and religion that are not based on some kind of sacrifice? These questions seem essential in our time, when the meaning of sacrifice is compromised by acts of terrorism. It is relatively easy to denounce terrorism and its propaganda, which uses the concept of martyrdom, as an inauthentic approach to the experience of sacrifice (Marion). But how can we break its spell if we believe that sacrifice brings our existence to completeness (Patočka)? How can we avoid inauthentic forms of sacrifice, if we believe that without sacrifice we must fall into nihilism and indifference?

Keywords: the unsacrificeable; coexistence; terrorism; politics; religion

References

  • Agamben, Girogio. Remnants of Auschwitz. The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Alexievitch, Svetlana. Chernobyl Prayer. A Chronicle of the Future. Penguin Classic, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Arend, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Schocken Books, 1951.Google Scholar

  • Gandhi, Mahatma. Discourses on the Gita. Ahemadabad: Navajivan Publishing House, 1960.Google Scholar

  • Heidegger, Martin. “What is Metaphysics?” In Pathmarks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Kosík, Karel. Jinoch a smrt. Praha: Hynek, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Kouba, Pavel. Problém třetího pohybu. Na okraj Patočkova pojetí existence. Praha: CFB, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Marion, Jean-Luc. “Sketch of a Phenomenological Notion of Sacrifice”. In The Reason of the Gift. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Nancy, Jean-Luc. “The Unsacrificeable”. In A Finite Thinking. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Nancy, Jean-Luc. Being Singular Plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

  • Patočka, Jan. Tělo, společenství, jazyk, svět. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 1995.Google Scholar

  • Patočka, Jan. Péče o duši III, Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Patočka, Jan. Fenomenologické spisy II. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Tava, Francesco. ‘Oběť jako politický problém: Jan Patočka a sociologie posvátna’. Filosofický časopis, 2018/2.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-04-16

Accepted: 2019-09-02

Published Online: 2019-10-05


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 377–385, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0027.

Export Citation

© 2019 Petr Kouba, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in