Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles


Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index
ERIH PLUS

CiteScore 2018: 0.37

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.975

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2300-6579
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Truth Communication in Times of Digital Abundance: A Practical Theological Perspective

Thomas Schlag
Published Online: 2019-11-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0033

Abstract

Digital providers inundate their users with an abundance of words, as well as pictorial and iconic information that has long become almost unmanageable. In terms of religious communicative usage, there are some indications that a new, perhaps even disruptive quality is being introduced into these digital practices, particularly with regard to truth communication. For both the individual actors and their places of lived religion and religious communication, the claim to truth expressed in each case is influenced by the very dynamics of digital use. Against this background, the basic question arises of whether a practical-theological reflection in the mode of a critical observation of these digital dynamics is conceivable at all. Therefore, I examine the current dynamics of digital media use in more detail by focusing on the anthropologically and theologically relevant concept of “searching” in a fundamental sense. The question arises of whether the implied, highly intensive and independent religious search developments are actually able to represent and promise in their entirety that “truth” which can be meaningfully searched for and found according to theological understanding. From these reflections on a practical public theology, some exemplary consequences for the field of religious educational practice are subsequently pointed out. I argue that, in the sense of cultivating critical perception and interpretation competence, an awareness of the significance of this abundance of analogous expressions and behaviors should be created in concrete educational processes. But an awareness should also be created of the relevance of developing an identity and a personal relationality in the digital world, shaped by the theological idea not only of “searching,” but of “finding” and “being found.”

Keywords: religious digital practice; public theology; practical theology; communication; truth

References

  • Brunn, Frank Martin. Raum. Kirche. Öffentlichkeit. Dynamiken aktueller Präsenz. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2019.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Heidi A., ed. Religion and the Internet, 3 vols. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Campbell, Heidi A. and Stephen Garner. Networked Theology. Negotiating Faith in Digital Culture. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Cheong, Pauline Hope, ed. Digital Religion, Social Media, and Culture. Perspectives, Practices, and Futures. New York: Peter Lang, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Dalferth, Ingolf U. God First. Die reformatorische Revolution der christlichen Denkungsart. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Dalferth, Ingolf U. Wirkendes Wort. Bibel, Schrift und Evangelium im Leben der Kirchen und im Denken der Theologie. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Dalferth, Ingolf U. and Philipp Stoellger, eds. Wahrheit in Perspektiven. Probleme einer offenen Konstellation. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Dubois, Elizabeth and Grant Blank. “The Echo Chamber is Overstated: The Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (2018), 729–745.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Englert, Rudolf. “Komposition des Differenten. Inwieweit ist so etwas wie eine ‚religiöse Identität’ heute noch möglich?” In Mensch – Religion – Bildung. Religionspädagogik in anthropologischen Spannungsfeldern, edited by T. Schlag and H. Simojoki, 128–139. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2014.Google Scholar

  • Fischer, Max Julian. Meine Suchanfragen (text with installation). Heilbronn 2019.Google Scholar

  • Gojny, Tanja, Kathrin S. Kürzinger, and Susanne Schwarz, eds. Selfie – I Like It. Anthropologische und ethische Implikationen digitaler Selbstinszenierung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Gray, Richard. “Lies, Propaganda, and Fake News: A Challenge for Our Age” (1 March 2017) http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170301-lies-propaganda-and-fake-news-a-grand-challenge-of-our-age [accessed 15 April 2019].

  • Haberer, Johanna. Digitale Theologie. Gott und die Medienrevolution der Gegenwart. München: Kösel, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Jung, Volker. Digital Mensch bleiben. München: Claudius, 2018Google Scholar

  • Levmore, Saul and Martha C. Nussbaum, eds. The Offensive Internet. Speech, Privacy, and Reputation. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Meireis, Torsten. “‘O dass ich tausend Zungen hätte.’ Chancen und Gefahren der digitalen Transformation politischer Öffentlichkeit – die Perspektive evangelischer Theologie.” In Digitaler Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf politische Partizipation im Wandel, edited by J. Bedford-Strohm, F. Höhne, and J. Zeyher-Quattlender, 47–62. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2019.Google Scholar

  • Meyer-Blanck, Michael. “Unterscheiden, was zusammengehört. Zum Verhältnis von Wahrheitsfrage und Wirklichkeitsdeutung im Kontext religiöser Bildung.” ZPT 68 (2016), 7–18.Google Scholar

  • Meyer-Blanck, Michael. “Praktische Theologie und Religion.” In Praktische Theologie. Eine Theorie- und Problemgeschichte, edited by C. Grethlein and H. Schwier, 353–397. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Meyer-Blanck, Michael. Gottesdienstlehre. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Müller von Blumencron, Mathias. “Trennt Propaganda von Wahrheit!” FAZ, 5 February 2016. [https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/luegen-im-internet-spannen-ein-netz-der-verwirrung-14052436.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2].

  • Nord, Ilona, “‘Die Wahrheit hat einen einzigen Namen: Jesus Christus.’ Zum religionspädagogischen Umgang mit religiöser Wahrheit in einer mediatisierten Welt.” In Renaissance religiöser Wahrheit. Thematisierungen und Deutungen in praktisch-theologischer Perspektive, edited by I. Nord and T. Schlag, 203–223. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Nord, Ilona and Hanna Zipernovsky, eds. Religionspädagogik in einer mediatisierten Welt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2017.Google Scholar

  • Oorschot, Frederike van. “Fragmentierte Öffentlichkeiten und geteilte Realität. Zum osmotischen Potential theologischer Modellierung.” In Digitaler Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf politische Partizipation im Wandel, edited by J. Bedford-Strohm, F. Höhne, and J. Zeyher-Quattlender, 83–94. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2019.Google Scholar

  • Oorschot, Frederike van. “Making Public Theology Operational: Public Theology and the Church.” International Journal of Public Theology 13 (2019), 203–226.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble. What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, Peter, Kyle Schiefelbein-Guerrero, and Jonas Kurlberg. “Defining Digital Theology: Digital Humanities, Digital Religion and the Particular Work of the CODEC Research Centre and Network.” Open Theology 5 (2019), 29–43.Google Scholar

  • Rosa, Hartmut. Unverfügbarkeit. Salzburg: Residenz Verlag, 2018.Google Scholar

  • Schlag, Thomas. Öffentliche Kirche. Grunddimensionen einer praktisch-theologischen Kirchentheorie. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2012.Google Scholar

  • Schlag, Thomas. “Religionspädagogik als Lebenswissenschaft. Bildungstheoretische Vermessungen in weisheitlich-lebensdienlicher Perspektive.” Zeitschrift für Theologie und Kirche 116 (2019), 228–250.Google Scholar

  • Schröter, Jens, “Analog/Digital – Opposition oder Kontinuum?” In Analog/Digital – Opposition oder Kontinuum? Zur Theorie und Geschichte einer Unterscheidung, edited by J. Schröter and A. Böhnke, 7–30. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Spiekermann, Sarah. Digitale Ethik. Ein Wertesystem für das 21. Jahrhundert. Munich: Droemer, 2019.Google Scholar

  • Stalder, Felix. Kultur der Digitalität. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2016.Google Scholar

  • Thiede, Werner. Digitaler Turmbau zu Babel. Der Technikwahn und seine Folgen. München: Oekom, 2015.Google Scholar

  • Volf, Miroslav and Matthew Croasmun. For The Life of the World. Theology that Makes a Difference. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2019.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2019-07-08

Accepted: 2019-10-04

Published Online: 2019-11-04


Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 420–429, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0033.

Export Citation

© 2019 Thomas Schlag, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Claire Clivaz and Garrick V. Allen
Open Theology, 2019, Volume 5, Number 1, Page 461

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in