Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal

Co-published with University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of virtual team in Nigerian construction industry

Tawakalitu Bisola Odubiyi / Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke
Published Online: 2017-03-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0003


The rationale behind any construction project varies; it might be to achieve value, time, quality, cost or just satisfaction for the client. Irrespective of any or all of these reasons, the team members involved in conception, inception, construction and delivery of a project are aware that a good teamwork is of essence. This is in the context of growing needs of client and the ever-growing improvement in methods of project delivery as influenced by technology. This article looks into the team type in the Nigerian construction industry from the angle of a virtual team (VT) using the mixed-method research design. VT is simply a type of team wherein the members operate from different geographical regions and function majorly with the aid of information and communications technology media. Data for the study were collected from relevant literature, interviews were conducted with 20 selected professionals in the construction industry and, thereafter, a questionnaire was drafted from the results of the interviews and administered to selected relevant professionals. The study revealed that communication among team members, flexibility of operation and decision making are usually the most influencing strengths of the VT, while some of its weaknesses are a need for special training, conflict among team members and client’s acceptance of team type. Reduction in time-to-market, collaboration ability of team members and delivery time of project were seen as opportunities, while recognized threats were members’ performance level and complexity of technical application. The study concludes that the success of the VT depends highly on exploiting the opportunities opened to it.

Keywords: strengths; weaknesses; opportunities and threats; team; traditional team; virtual team


  • Acs, Z., & Preston, L. (1997). Small and medium-sized enterprises. Technology and Globalisation, 9(9), pp. 1-6.Google Scholar

  • Adeniyi, O., Aje, I., & Ogunsemi, D. (2011). Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for public, private partnership in infrastructure delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Construction Project Management and Innovation, 1(2), pp. 130-154.Google Scholar

  • Amirhossein, M., Mohammad, H. S., & Samira, H. (2013). Enhancing general contractors capacities with collaborative network. Organization, Technology, and Management in Construction, 6(2), pp. 784-790.Google Scholar

  • Aspin, R., DaDalto,L., Fernando,T., Gobbetti, E., Marache, M., Shelbourn, M., & Soubra, S. (2001). A conceptual framework for multi-modal interactive virtual workplace. Information Technology Conference, 7, p. 149.Google Scholar

  • Badrinarayanan, V., & Arnett, D. (2008). Effective new product development teams: An integrated framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 4, pp. 242-248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bamgbade, A. A., Jimoh, R. A., & Kuroshi, P. (2014). Cultural diversity management of construction firms in Abuja Nigeria. Organization, Technology, and Management in Construction, 6(2), pp. 1047-1057.Google Scholar

  • Camarinha-Motos, L., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2003). Elements of a base in infrastructure. Computers in Industry, 51(2), pp. 139-163.Google Scholar

  • David, I., & Ugochukwu, M. (2012). Gender, teamwork and management: A glimpse into the Nigerian situation. Journal of Research in National Development, 10(3), ISSN: 1596-8308.Google Scholar

  • Delarue, A., Stijin. G., & Van, H. G. (2003). Productivity outcomes of teamwork as an effect of team structure. Working Paper. Steunpunt OOI, Catholic University of Leuven.Google Scholar

  • DeSanctis, G., Staudenmayer, N., & Wong, S. (1999). Interdependence in virtual organizations. Trends in Organizational Behaviour, 6, pp. 81-104.Google Scholar

  • Ekung, S. B. (2012). Leadership Traits of Construction Project Managers and its Impact on project outcome in Akwa Ibom State. Msc Dissertation, Department of Building, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.Google Scholar

  • Ekung, S. B., Olubanjo, O., & Ubong, E. (2015). Influence of leadership Traits on Team performance as correlates of success in construction project delivery. Civil Engineering and Urban Planning: An International Journal, 2(2), pp. 19-28.Google Scholar

  • Erica, O. (2010). Internal and External Analysis. OnStrategy Publication.Google Scholar

  • Grant, R. M. (2005). Contemporary Strategy Analysis, 7th edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom.Google Scholar

  • Hoyt, B. R. (2000). Techniques to manage participation and contribution of team members in virtual team. WebNet Journal, 2(4), p. 16.Google Scholar

  • Jarvenpaa, S., & Leinder, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organisational Science, 10, pp. 791-815.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, P., Heimann, V., & O’Neill, K. (2001). The “wonderland” of virtual teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, pp. 24-30.Google Scholar

  • Kayworth, T., & Leinder, D. (2002). Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), pp. 7-40.Google Scholar

  • Kotler, P., & Keller, L. K. (2006). Marketing Management, 14th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar

  • Ksenija, C. V., & Vladimir, S. (2009). Paradigms of virtual teams in the communication process. Informatologia, 42(3), pp. 197-204.Google Scholar

  • Lars, L. (1997). Virtual engineering teams: Strategy and implementation. Information Technology Conference, 2, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar

  • Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (2000). Why The Way to Work, Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar

  • Liu, Y., Lou, I., & Wei, X. (2008). The effects of cultural diversity, conflict. In: 4th IEEC International Conference on Wireless Communication, Networking and Mobile Computing in Global Virtual Team, Dalian, China, 4, pp. 1-4.Google Scholar

  • Marina, D. (2012). SWOT analysis of Serbia’s raspberry sector in the competitive marketplace. Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Life Science.Google Scholar

  • May, A., & Carter, C. (2001). A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, pp. 171-180.Google Scholar

  • Odusami, K. T., Iyagba, R. R., & Omirin, M. M. (2003). The relationship between project leadership, team composition and construction project performance in Nigeria. Journal of International Project Management, 21, pp. 519-527.Google Scholar

  • Olatunji, O., & Sher, W. (2014). Perspectives on modelling BIM-enabled estimating practices. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 14(4), pp. 32-53.Google Scholar

  • Ommani, A. (2011). Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis of farming system business management: Case of wheat farmers of Shadervan District, Shoushter Township, Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), pp. 9448-9454.Google Scholar

  • Paul, S., & Eddy, M. (2003). Virtual teams: Guide to successful implementation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(3), pp. 98-106.Google Scholar

  • Pearce, P. (1992). Construction Marketing: A Professional Approach. Thomas Telford, London.Google Scholar

  • Piccoli, G., Powell A., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: Team control structure, work processes. Information Technology and People, 17(4), pp. 359-379.Google Scholar

  • Prasad, K., & Akhilesh, K. (2002). Global virtual teams: What impacts their design and performance. Team Performance Management, 8, pp. 102-112.Google Scholar

  • Rezgui, Y. (2007). Exploring Virtual team-working effectiveness in the construction sector for collaborative research projects. Journal of Innovation Learning, 19, pp. 96-112.Google Scholar

  • Rosen, B., Furst, S., & Blackburn, R. (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics Journal, 36(3), pp. 259-273.Google Scholar

  • Shikha, G. (2013, May-June). Virtual teams versus face to face teams: A review of literature. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 11(2), pp. 01-04.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Staples, D., & Zhao, L. (2006). The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams, group decision and negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(4), pp. 389-406.Google Scholar

  • Whalley, A. (2010). Strategic Marketing. Whalley and Ventus Publishing APS, London.Google Scholar

  • William, B. J., & Darlene, M. S. (2002). Teambuilding in the Construction Industry. AACE International Transactions.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Y., Gregory, M., & Shi, Y. (2008). Global Engineering Networks (GEN): Drivers, evolution, configuration, performance and Key patterns. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 19, pp. 299-314.Google Scholar

  • Zhao, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Are Chinese contractors competitive in international market? Construction Management and Economics, 26(3), pp. 255-236. Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-03-22

Accepted: 2016-06-17

Published Online: 2017-03-14

Published in Print: 2016-12-01

Citation Information: Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 1422–1428, ISSN (Online) 1847-6228, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0003.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in