Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal

Co-published with University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1847-6228
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Recognition of the role of nature in the formation of fractal architecture

Assistant Professor Seyedeh Somayeh Mirmoradi
  • Corresponding author
  • Architecture Department, School of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-09-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0020

Abstract

After a long period of one-way consumerist atti­tude toward nature, there have been some alternate per­spectives on the systemic relationship between humans and nature, which have been again brought up during the past few decades. Since the late twentieth century, fractal architecture has been one of the most important themes discussed in architecture and it is based on the chaos and complexity theories. Critics often criticize this architecture due to its lack of architectural values, practi­cality, and attention to economy, culture, and history. The current study aims to clarify the scientific theories that are the theoretical foundations of this approach in contempo­rary architecture. By categorizing the practical examples of this architectural approach, they are analyzed in terms of their relationship with nature using the logical reasoning method to achieve a favorable architecture. In fact, the gap between this architecture and nature’s behavior is shown.

Keywords : chaos theory; fractal architecture; form; geometry; nature

References

  • Betsky, A. (1990). Violated Perfection: Architecture and the Fragmentation of the Modern. Rizzoli, New York. Google Scholar

  • Bovill, C. (1996). Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design. Birkhäuser, Boston. Google Scholar

  • Burckhardt, T. (2003). Principes et méthodes de l’art sacré, (Trans. J. Sattari), Soroush Publications, Tehran. Google Scholar

  • Eisenman, P. (1988). “Eisenmanesie”. V: Architecture + Urbanism, Vol. Extra edition. August. p.:70. Google Scholar

  • Harris, J. (2007). Integrated function systems and organic architecture from Wright to Mondrian. Nexus Network Journal, 9(1), pp. 93-101. Google Scholar

  • Jencks, C. (2004). The architecture of the jumping universe, (Trans. V. Ghobadian & D. Sattarzadeh), Tabriz Islamic Azad University Publications, Tabriz. Google Scholar

  • Joy, Y. (2011). A review of the presence and use of fractal geometry in architectural design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design Journal, 38(5), pp. 814-828. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Langhof, C. (1994). Imagination is More Important than Knowledge. Curtin University, Architecture Document. Google Scholar

  • Lorentz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 20, pp. 130-141. Google Scholar

  • Lorenz, W . E. (2003). Fractals and fractal architecture. Master’s thesis, Vienna University of Technology. Google Scholar

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York. Google Scholar

  • Mandelbrot, B. (1992). Fractal geometry: A descriptor of nature, (Trans: M. Bagheri), Daneshmand Journal, 29(338), pp. 35-42. Google Scholar

  • Ostwald, M. J. (2001). Fractal architecture: Late twentieth century connections between architecture and fractal geometry. Nexus Network Journal, 3(1), pp. 73-83. Google Scholar

  • Ostwald, M. J. (2010). The politics of fractal geometry in Russian paper architecture: The intelligent market and the cube of infinity. Architectural Theory Review, 15(2), pp. 125-137. CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ostwald, M. J., & Williams, K. (2015). Mathematics in, of and for architecture: A framework of types. In: Williams, K., & Ostwald, M. (eds.), Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 31-57. Google Scholar

  • Ostwald, M. J., & Vaughan, J. (2016). The fractal dimension of architecture. In: Williams, K. (ed.), Mathematics and the Built Environment. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp. 21-37. Google Scholar

  • Pawley, M. (1994). Fall off your chair at the folly. The Observer, May 22. Google Scholar

  • Pearson, D. (2001). New Organic Architecture, the Breaking Waves. University of California Press, California. Google Scholar

  • Prigogine, I. (1984). Order Out of Chaos, the Evolutionary Paradigm and the Physical Sciences. Bantam Books, New York. Google Scholar

  • Salingaros, N. (2004). Fractals in the new architecture, (Trans: N. Chitsazan & N. Iranmanesh), Architect Journal, 26, pp. 26-29. Google Scholar

  • Sardar, Z. (2001). Introducing Chaos, (Trans: A. Gharib). Shirazeh Publications, Tehran. Google Scholar

  • Shepheard, P. (1994). What is Architecture: An Essay on Landscapes, Buildings, and Machines. MIT Press, Cambridge & Massachusetts. Google Scholar

  • Sorkin, M. (1991). Nineteen millennial mantras. In: Noever P (ed.), Architecture in Transition: Between Deconstruction and New Modernism. Prestel, Munich. Google Scholar

  • Vaughan, J., & Ostwald, M. J. (2017). The comparative numerical analysis of nature and architecture: A new framework. International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics, 12(2), pp. 156-166.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-01-15

Accepted: 2017-05-20

Published Online: 2017-09-08

Published in Print: 2017-01-27


Citation Information: Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 1574–1583, ISSN (Online) 1847-6228, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0020.

Export Citation

© 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in