Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal

Co-published with University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Cost and time performance of traditional-, direct labour- and management-procured public projects in Ondo State, Nigeria

Douglas Omoregie Aghimien / Olufemi Osanyinro
  • B.Tech., Murty International Limited, Suite 308, Midel Centre, Plot 14, Off Oladipo Diya way, Sector Centre D, Gudu, Abuja, Nigeria
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Taiwo Fadeke Adegbembo
  • M.Tech., Department of Quantity Surveying, Federal University of Technology, Akure, P.M.B. 704, Ondo State, Nigeria
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-12-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0022


Procurement method over time has proven to have significant influence on the successful delivery of construc­tion projects. Making the right decision in the selection of a procurement option to adopt is therefore crucial if a project is to succeed. This study therefore assessed the cost and time performance of selected public building projects procured using traditional, direct labour and management procure­ment options in Ondo State, Nigeria. A pro forma was used to gather cost and time data from government procuring enti­ties in the state. In addition, a structured questionnaire was used to obtain information from construction professionals in these procuring entities, in order to ascertain the factors influencing the choice of procurement options adopted. The cost and time data gathered were analyzed using percent­ages and the paired-samples t-test, while those gathered on the factors influencing the choice of procurement options were analyzed using mean item scores and analysis of var­iance (ANOVA). The results revealed that although there is no significant difference between the initial and final costs of the assessed projects, some measure of cost overrun still exists. In addition, a considerable amount of time overrun was experienced on projects executed using the three differ­ent procurement options. The most significant factors influ­encing the choice of a procurement option are price compe­tition, speed, time certainty and complexity of the project. It is believed that the findings of this study will provide public procuring entities with insight on the cost and time capabil­ity of these procurement methods and aid them in selecting the procurement option that will help in delivering public building projects within the budget and on schedule.

Keywords: cost; direct labour; management procurement; project success; public building projects; time; traditional procurement


  • Adenuga, O. A. (2013). Comparison of the performance of traditional and direct labour methods of project procurement: A case study of some selected projects of the Nigerian army. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 6(1), pp. 12-30. Google Scholar

  • Afriyie, B. B. (2014). Factors influencing the selection of procurement methods for construction works in Ghana. A Thesis submitted to the Department of Building Technology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Master of Science (MSc) in Procurement Management, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. Google Scholar

  • Aghimien, D. O., & Awodele, O. A. (2017). Variability of cost and time delivery of educational buildings in Nigeria. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 4(3), pp. 156-164. Google Scholar

  • Aghimien, D. O., Awodele, O. A., Adegbembo, T. F., & Olatunji, S. O. (2017). Cost performance of educational buildings in Ondo State, Nigeria. In: Environmental Design and Management International Conference (EDMIC), 22-24 May, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, pp. 298-307. Google Scholar

  • Akindoyeni, A. (1989). The management of abandoned projects. Journal of the Nigerian Institute of Building, Maiden edition, 1(2), pp. 16-20.Google Scholar

  • Ashworth, A., & Hogg, K. (2007). Willis’s Practice and Procedure for Quantity Surveyor. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK. Google Scholar

  • Babatunde, S. O., Opawole, A., & Ujaddughe, I. C. (2010). An appraisal of project procurement methods in the Nigerian construction industry. Civil Engineering Dimension, 12(1), pp. 1-7. Google Scholar

  • Blaxter, L., Huges, C., & Tight, M. (2001). How to Research, 2nd edn. Open University Press, London, UK. Google Scholar

  • Brook, M. (2004). Estimating and Tendering for Construction Works. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford. Google Scholar

  • Chan, A. P. C. (2001). Framework for Measuring Success of Construction Projects Report 2001-003C-01” In: School of Construction Management and Property Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, Australia. Google Scholar

  • Chan, C. T. W. (2007). Fuzzy procurement selection model for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 25(6), pp. 611-618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, S. O., Lam, T. I., Leung, M. Y., & Wan, Y. W. (2001). An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method. Construction Management and Economics, 19(4), pp. 427-437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dada, M. O., & Oladokun, M. G. (2012). Analysis of critical success sub-factors for public-private partnership in Nigeria. Alam Cipta, 5(2), pp. 13-26. Google Scholar

  • Davis, P., Love, P., & Baccarini, D. (2008). Building Procurement Methods. CRC for Construction Innovation, Brisbane. Google Scholar

  • Edmond, W. M., Albert, P. C., & Daniel, W. M. (2008). Determinants of successful design-build projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(5), pp. 333-341. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • El-Agha, O. I. (2013). Factors affecting the selection of procurement methods in the construction projects in Gaza Strip. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for Degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering - Construction Management the Islamic University of Gaza. Google Scholar

  • Eyitope, A., Ojo, S., Ajibola, M., & Gbadebo, R., (2012). Critical selection criteria for appropriate procurement strategy for project delivery in Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(5), pp. 422-428. Google Scholar

  • Hibberd, P. R., & Djebarni, R. (1996). Criteria of choice for procurement method. In: Proceedings: RICS Construction Research Conference (COBRA), held in University of West England, Bristol city, 19-20 September. Google Scholar

  • Idoro, G., & Iyagba, R. (2008). A comparative study of the use of procurement systems in the construction industry of Finland and Nigeria. The Professional Builder, 6(4), 34-37. Google Scholar

  • Idoro, G. I., Iyagba, R. O. A., & Odusami, K. T. (2007). Client’s charac­teristics and the use of direct labour system in the Nigerian construction industry. In: Proceedings: RIC Construction Research Conference (COBRA), Georgia Tech, Atlanta, USA, 6-7 September. Google Scholar

  • Inuwa, I. I., Wanyona, G., & Diang’a, S. (2014). Construction procurement systems: influencing factors for Nigerian indigenous contractors’ project planning. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 3(4), 1043-1050. Google Scholar

  • Kadiri, D. S., & Odusami, K. T. (2003). Comparative study of time and cost performance of direct labour and labour only procurement systems. The Quantity Surveyor, 44(3), pp. 9-16. Google Scholar

  • Larmour, J. (2011). A Study of Procurement Routes and their Use in the Commercial Sector. PhD thesis, Interdisciplinary Design for the Built Environment. Google Scholar

  • Love, P. E. D., Skitmore, M., & Earl, G. (1998). Selecting an appropriate procurement method for the construction process: An empirical study. Construction Management and Economics, 16(2), pp. 221-233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luu, D. T., Ng, S. T., & Chen, S. E. (2005). Formulating procurement selection criteria through case based reasoning approach. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 19(3), pp. 269-276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mahon, C. (2011). Key Procurement Selection Criteria of Auckland Interior Fitout Clients: An Empirical Study. A Report for Industry Project CONS 7819 Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Construction, Unitec New Zealand, Auckland. Google Scholar

  • Maizon, H., Mellisa, C., Tay, L., Shim, M., Ng, C., & Ng, S. (2006). Factors influencing the selection of procurement systems by client. In: Proceedings: International Conference on Construction Industry, Padang, Indonesia, 21-25 June. Google Scholar

  • Masterman, J. W. E. (1996). Building Procurement Systems: An Introduction. E & FN Spon, London. Google Scholar

  • Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., Abdullah, M. R., & Azis, A. A. (2010). Factors affecting construction cost performance in project management projects: Case of Mara large projects. In: Proceedings of Post Graduate Seminar on Engineering, Technology and Social Science. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor. Google Scholar

  • Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., Abdullah, M. R., & Azis, A. A. (2012). The cause factors of large project’s cost overrun: A survey in the southern part of peninsular. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 7(2), pp. 1-15. Google Scholar

  • Moser, C. A., & Kalton, G. (1999). Survey Methods in Social Investigation, 2nd edn. Gower Publishing Company Ltd, Aldershot. Google Scholar

  • National Institute of Building Sciences. (2013). Estimating Methods. Available at www.nibs.org/%3Fpage%3Dconference. Google Scholar

  • Ng, T., Luu, C., & Swee, C. (2002). Decision criteria and their subjectivity in construction procurement selection. The Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 2(1), pp. 70-80. Google Scholar

  • Odeyinka, H. A., & Yusif, A. (1997). The causes and effect of construction delays on completion cost of housing projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management Property and Construction, 2(3), pp. 31-44. Google Scholar

  • Odusami, K. T. (2001). Project team leadership and construction project performance in some selected states in Nigeria. PhD thesis, Department of Building, University of Lagos, Akoka, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria. Google Scholar

  • Ogunsemi, D. R. (2015). Value for Money in Construction Projects: The Quantity Surveyor’s Quest. 71st Inaugural Lecture delivered by Prof. D.R. Ogunsemi at the 2500 Capacity Auditorium, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State. Google Scholar

  • Ogunsemi, D. R., & Jagboro, G. O. (2006). Time-cost model for building projects in Nigeria. Construction Management and Economics, 24, pp. 253-258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ogunsemi, D. R., & Saka, N. (2006). The NEPAD initiative and the challenge of efficient cost management of infrastructure development in Nigeria. In: Paper Presented at the 22nd Biennial Conference of the Nigeria Institute of Quantity Surveyors, Calabar, 22-25 November. Google Scholar

  • Okunlola, O. J. O. S. (2012). PROMA - A decision support system to determine appropriate procurement method. Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(4), pp. 316-321. Google Scholar

  • Oladinrin, O. T., Olatunji, S. O., & Hamza, B. T. (2013). Effect of selected procurement systems on building project performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, 4(1), pp. 48-62. Google Scholar

  • Oluwakiyesi, T. (2011). Construction industry report: A haven of opportunities. Vitiva Research, Vitiva Capital Management Limited, pp. 1-48. Google Scholar

  • Omoregie, A., & Radford, D. (2006). Infrastructure delays and cost escalation: Causes and effects in Nigeria. In: Proceeding of Sixth International Postgraduate Research Conference, Delft University of Technology, held in city of Delft, Netherlands, Published by International council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction, pp. 79-93. Google Scholar

  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW, Australia. Google Scholar

  • Ratnasabapathy, S., Rameezdeen, R., & Gamage, I. (2006). Macro level factors affecting the construction procurement selection: A multi criteria model. In: Dulaimi, M. (ed.), Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Construction Culture, Innovation and Management (CCIM), held on 26-29 November, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Rotterdam (Netherlands): In-House publishing. Google Scholar

  • Sarah, L., Stanley, C., & Hugh, C. (2007). Which Contract? Choosing the Appropriate Building Contract. RIBA Publishing, UK. Google Scholar

  • Seeley, I. H. (1997). Quantity Surveying Practice. Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London. Google Scholar

  • Seng, N. W., & Yusof, A. M. (2006). The success factors of design and build procurement method: A literature visits. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference, held at Kuala Lampur, Malaysia, September 5-6, pp. 1-11. Google Scholar

  • Shiyamini, R., Rameezdeen, R., & Lebbe, N., (2008). Exploratory study of external environmental factors influencing the procurement selection in construction. In: Proceedings of the CIB International Conference on Building Education and Research, Kandalama, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-09-01

Accepted: 2017-11-14

Published Online: 2017-12-29

Published in Print: 2017-12-20

Citation Information: Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 1593–1603, ISSN (Online) 1847-6228, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0022.

Export Citation

© 2018. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in