Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Pure and Applied Chemistry

The Scientific Journal of IUPAC

Ed. by Burrows, Hugh / Weir, Ron / Stohner, Jürgen

12 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.626
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 3.210

CiteScore 2016: 2.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.972
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.049

Online
ISSN
1365-3075
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 75, Issue 10 (Jan 2003)

Issues

On the Claims for Discovery of Elements 110, 111, 112, 114, 116, and 118 (IUPAC Technical Report)

P. J. Karol
  • Corresponding author
  • IUPAC: Past Chair of Commission V.7 (Radiochemistry and Nuclear Techniques), Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ H. Nakahara
  • Corresponding author
  • IUPAC :Titular Member, Commission V.7 (Radiochemistry and Nuclear Techniques), Chemistry Department, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-03, Japan
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ B. W. Petley
  • Corresponding author
  • IUPAP: Past Chair of Commission C2 (Symbols, Units, Nomenclature, Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants), Centre for Basic, Thermal, and Length Metrology, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex TW11 OLW, UK
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ E. Vogt
  • Corresponding author
  • IUPAP: Past Chair of Commission C12 (Nuclear Physics), TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1W5, Canada
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2009-01-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375101601

The IUPAC/IUPAP Joint Working Party on the priority of claims to the discovery of new elements has reviewed the relevant literature pertaining to several claims. In accordance with the criteria for the discovery of elements, previously established by the 1992 IUPAC/IUPAP Transfermium Working Group, and reinforced by the 1999 IUPAC/IUPAP Joint Working Party, it was determined that the claim by the Hofmann et al. research collaboration for the discovery of element 111 at Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI) has fulfilled those criteria. For elements 112, 114, and 116, the collaborations of Hofmann et al. and of Oganessian et al. produced high-quality data with plausible interpretations. However, confirmation by further results is needed to assign priority of discovery for these elements. The working party was not persuaded that other collaborations have satisfied the discovery criteria.

Project Year: 1998, Project Code: 220/31/98

About the article

Published Online: 2009-01-01

Published in Print: 2003-01-01


Citation Information: Pure and Applied Chemistry, ISSN (Online) 1365-3075, ISSN (Print) 0033-4545, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375101601.

Export Citation

© 2013 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
B. S. Ishkhanov and T. Yu. Tretyakova
Moscow University Physics Bulletin, 2017, Volume 72, Number 3, Page 203
[2]
Elhashmi Y. Hilal, Mohamed A. E. Elkhairey, and Ayman O. A. Osman
Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 2016, Volume 06, Number 04, Page 304
[3]
G. Münzenberg
Nuclear Physics A, 2015, Volume 944, Page 5
[4]
Y. Nagame
Journal of Nuclear and Radiochemical Sciences, 2005, Volume 6, Number 2, Page A21
[5]
Andreas Türler and Valeria Pershina
Chemical Reviews, 2013, Volume 113, Number 2, Page 1237
[6]
M. Thoennessen
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 2013, Volume 99, Number 3, Page 312
[7]
P. Armbruster and Gottfried Münzenberg
The European Physical Journal H, 2012, Volume 37, Number 2, Page 237
[8]
M. Gupta and Thomas W. Burrows
Nuclear Data Sheets, 2005, Volume 106, Number 2, Page 251
[9]
R.-D. Herzberg and P.T. Greenlees
Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 2008, Volume 61, Number 2, Page 674
[10]
Jozsef Garai
International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 2007, Volume 108, Number 4, Page 667
[11]
NE Holden and SW Dean
Journal of ASTM International, 2006, Volume 3, Number 7, Page 13484
[12]
D. C. Hoffman
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2008, Volume 276, Number 2, Page 525
[13]
Matthias Schädel
Angewandte Chemie, 2006, Volume 118, Number 3, Page 378
[14]
Matthias Schädel
Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006, Volume 45, Number 3, Page 368
[15]
S. A. Cotton
Annual Reports Section "A" (Inorganic Chemistry), 2005, Volume 101, Page 294
[16]
N. Momoshima, A. Fukuda, A. Ishida, and C. Yoshinaga
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2007, Volume 272, Number 2, Page 413

Comments (3)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in
  • I'd Name 118 Democritum because he started the concept of an atom thus leading to the table of elements

    posted by: Anonymous on 2014-10-09 12:29 AM (Europe/Berlin)

  • I'd also name 110 Aristotum because of his ordeal about the atom thus delaying the table of elements and the atomic theory

    posted by: Anonymous on 2014-10-09 12:34 AM (Europe/Berlin)

  • I would name at least one element (117) after Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs (29 December 1911 – 28 January 1988) He gave U.S atomic bombs secrets to Britain and the U.S.S.R, to maintain the global balance of power. Making him effectively a savior of the earth. have it be called "Fuchsium" wit atomic symbol "Fs". I would also name at least one other element (115) "Unobtanium" with atomic symbol "Un"

    posted by: David Vermillion on 2015-11-27 07:55 PM (Europe/Berlin)