Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Prenatal Cardiology

Editor-in-Chief: Respondek-Liberska, Maria

Managing Editor: Slodki, Maciej / Lami, Yeo

1 Issue per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

How "fast" reading of prenatal cardiac diagnosis may badly influence the neonatal management - case report from tertiary center in 2015 and literature review

Katarzyna Piątek / Katarzyna Zych-Krekora / Joanna Płużańska / Ewa Gulczyńska / Maria Respondek-Liberska
  • Department of Diagnoses and Prevention Fetal Malformations Medical University of Lodz
  • Department of Prenatal Cardiology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-12-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.12847/09158


Complains about prenatal diagnoses usually touch late diagnosis, missed diagnosis or uncomplete diagnosis. Prenatal diagnose provides usually important information for parents, obstetrician and neonatologist. Successful perinatal care is based on a good cooperation of the perinatal team. This time we present a peculiar situation when improper reading of prenatal diagnosis had caused a lot of troubles for the patient, parents and hospital staff.

Keywords: prenatal diagnoses; misinterpretation; l-TGA; d-TGA


  • 1. Park JK, DK Taylor, M Skeels, DR Towner. 1997. “Dilated coronary sinus in the fetus: misinterpretation as an atrioventricular canal defect”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10 (2): 126-129CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 2. Pilu G, L De Palma, R Romero, L Bovicelli, JC Hobbins. 1986. “The fetal subarachnoid cisterns: an ultrasound study with report of a case of congenital communicating hydrocephalus”. J Ultrasound Med 5 (7):365-372Google Scholar

  • 3. Onumba, OC Dilly. 2013. “Errors in prenatal diagnosis”, Best Practice & Research ,Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 27 (4):537-548Google Scholar

  • 4. Ahn H, E Hernández-Andrade, R Romero, M Ptwardhan, LF Goncalves, A Aurioles-Garibay, M Garcia , SS Hassan, L Yeo. 2013. “Mirror artifacts in obstetric ultrasound: case presentation of a ghost twin during the second-trimester ultrasound scan”. Fetal Diagn Ther. 34(4):248-252. doi:10.1159/000353702.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 5. Altug N, AN Danisman. 2013. “Echogenic focus in the fetal left ventricular cavity: is it a false tendon?”. Early Hum Dev. 89 (7):479-482. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.03.012.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 6. Garnier S, O Maillet, S Haouy, M Saguintaah, I Serre, RB Galifer, D Forgues, MP Guibal, H Allal, E Sabatier, N Kalfa. 2012. “Prenatal intrarenal neuroblastoma mimicking a mesoblastic nephroma: a case report”. J Pediatr Surg. 47 (8):21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.090.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Paladini D, P Volpe, M Marasini, MG Russo, M Vassallo, M Gentile, R Calabro. 2006. “Diagnosis, characterization and outcome of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the fetus: a multicenter series of 30 cases”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:281-285CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 8. Sabatowska M, M Soroka, M Słodki. 2015. “Prenatal diagnosis of congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries on the basis of four heart chambers’ image - case report. Prenat Cardio. 5 (1): 26-28Google Scholar

  • 9. Kornacka M, M Respondek-Liberska. 2013. “The place for neonatologist in proper perinatal care”. Prenat Cardio. 3 (3): 12-15Google Scholar

  • 10. Blitek M, K Janiak, M Słodki, K Szaflik, A Piaseczna-Piotrowska, I Maroszyńska, M Respondek-Liberska. 2012. [Echocardiographic monitoring of an invasive fetal therapy CCAM type II - case report]. Prenat Cardio. 2 (5): 37-41. [Polish]Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 0015-09-21

Accepted: 2015-09-27

Published Online: 2015-12-30

Published in Print: 2015-09-01

Citation Information: Prenatal Cardiology, Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 38–41, ISSN (Online) 2353-8201, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12847/09158.

Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in