Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Caruso, Raul

Ed. by Böhmelt, Tobias / Bove, Vincenzo / Kibris, Arzu / Sekeris, Petros

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.39

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.182
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.224

Online
ISSN
1554-8597
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 9, Issue 2 (Apr 2003)

Issues

Volume 17 (2011)

Volume 4 (1996)

Volume 3 (1995)

Volume 2 (1994)

Volume 1 (1993)

The Impact of International Economic Sanctions on Trade: An Empirical Analysis

Raul Caruso
  • 1Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano
Published Online: 2003-04-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1061

International economic sanctions appear to be a common and recurring feature of political interactions between states. In particular, the United States is the country which has most frequently applied negative economic sanctions after World War II. In a parallel way, several measures, imposed by a multilateral organisation like the United Nations have taken place in recent years. This paper provides, through a gravity model approach, an estimation of the impact of economic negative sanctions on international trade.

First, the study reports panel gravity estimates of bilateral trade between the U.S. and 49 target countries over the period 1960-2000, inclusive. The results show that extensive and comprehensive sanctions have a large negative impact on bilateral trade, while this is not the case for limited and moderate sanctions. A second estimation focuses on the impact of unilateral U.S. sanctions on bilateral trade volume between target countries and the other G-7 countries over the same period. The results show that unilateral extensive sanctions have a large negative impact, while limited and moderate ones induce a slight positive effect on other G-7 countries bilateral trade. Thus, in the first case the hypothesis of negative 'network effects' is confirmed, while in the latter the sanctions-busting argument should be defended. In both estimations, however, multilateral sanctions demonstrate a large negative impact on trade flows.

Keywords: International negative sanctions; international trade; gravity model

About the article

Published Online: 2003-04-01



Citation Information: Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, ISSN (Online) 1554-8597, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-8597.1061. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Arslan Tariq Rana
Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 2015, Volume 21, Number 4
[2]
DAVID LEKTZIAN and GLEN BIGLAISER
International Studies Quarterly, 2013, Volume 57, Number 1, Page 65
[3]
Olivier Lamotte
Comparative Economic Studies, 2012, Volume 54, Number 3, Page 553
[4]
Glen Biglaiser and David Lektzian
International Organization, 2011, Volume 65, Number 03, Page 531
[5]
Dursun Peksen and A. Cooper Drury
International Interactions, 2010, Volume 36, Number 3, Page 240
[6]
Jiawen Yang, Hossein Askari, John Forrer, and Lili Zhu
World Economy, 2009, Volume 32, Number 8, Page 1223
[7]
Bryan R. Early
International Studies Quarterly, 2009, Volume 53, Number 1, Page 49

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in