Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Caruso, Raul

Ed. by Bove, Vincenzo / Kibris, Arzu / Sekeris, Petros

CiteScore 2017: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.304
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.540

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 21, Issue 4


Volume 17 (2011)

Volume 4 (1996)

Volume 3 (1995)

Volume 2 (1994)

Volume 1 (1993)

Sustaining Civil Peace: A Configurational Comparative Analysis

Thomas Gries
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics, University of Paderborn, Warburger Straße 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Irene PalnauORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-8506
Published Online: 2015-08-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2015-0020


While much work has been devoted to the causes and consequences of civil war, little has been done to explore the prerequisites for civil peace. We shift the focus from the determinants of war to the preconditions to sustain peace, and address the following question: Are there necessary or sufficient conditions for stable civil peace? We use Qualitative Comparative Analysis to approach this question. We do not find necessary conditions for civil peace, but distinct potentially sufficient paths. These are (i) the presence of a fully democratic regime and (ii) the presence of a strongly autocratic regime, with the latter further requiring either a) the absence of a youth bulge and non-miserable living conditions or b) the absence of ethnic tensions. The first type of civil peace is referred to as inherent civil peace whereas the second type is largely a result of strong repression and thus denoted coerced civil peace.

Keywords: civil war; civil peace; qualitative comparative analysis

JEL Classification:: B50; F52; H10


  • Bara, C., (2014), Incentives and Opportunities: A Complexity-Oriented Explanation of Violent Ethnic Conflict, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 696–710.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blattman, C., Miguel, E., (2010), Civil War, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 3–57.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, S., (2003), Explaining War Termination: A Boolean Analysis of Causes, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collier, P., (2000), Rebellion as a Quasi-Criminal Activity, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 839–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., (2004), Greed and Grievance in Civil War, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 563–595.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., Rohner, D., (2009), Beyond Greed and Grievance: Feasibility and Civil War, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 61, pp. 1–27.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fearon, J.D., (2004), Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others?, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 275–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fearon, J.D., Laitin, D.D., (1996), Explaining Interethnic Cooperation, American Political Science Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 715–735.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fearon, J.D., Laitin, D.D., (2003), Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War, American Political Science Review, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 75–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldstone, J.A., Bates, R.H., Epstein, D.L., Gurr, T.R., Lustik, M.B., Marshall, M.G., Ulfelder, J., Woodward, M., (2010), A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 190–208.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S., Gleditsch, N.P., (2001), Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992, American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar

  • Humphreys, M., (2005), Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 508–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Huntington, S.P., (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.Google Scholar

  • Khan, M., (2002, July 27), To Keep The Peace, Study Peace, The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/27/arts/to-keep-the-peace-study-peace.html.

  • Kogut, B., Ragin, C., (2006), Exploring Complexity When Diversity is Limited: Institutional Complementarity in Theories of Rule of Law and National Systems Revisited, European Management Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N.P., Gilmore, E., (2005), A Diamond Curse? Civil War and a Lootable Resource, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 538–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mesquida, C., Wiener, N., (1999), Male Age Composition and Severity of Conflicts, Politics and the Life Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 181–189.Google Scholar

  • Metelits, C.M., (2009), The Consequences of Rivalry: Explaining Insurgent Violence Using Fuzzy Sets, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 673–684.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ragin, C.C., (2000), Fuzzy-Set Social Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

  • Ragin, C.C., (2006), Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating their Consistency and Coverage, Political Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 291–310.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rihoux, B., Ragin, C.C., (2009), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 51, Sage, Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar

  • Ron, J., (2005), Paradigm in Distress?, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 443–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sambanis, N., (2002), A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 13, pp. 215–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C., (2006), Reducing Complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and Proximate Factors and The Consolidation of Democracy, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 751–786.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C., (2007), Qualitative Comparative Analysis und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen, Budrich, Opladen.Google Scholar

  • Urdal, H., (2004), The Devil in the Demographics: The Effect of Youth Bulges on Domestic Armed Conflict, 1950-2000, CPR Working Paper no. 14.Google Scholar

  • Urdal, H., (2006), A Clash of Generations? Youth Bulges and Political Violence, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 607–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Thomas Gries, Department of Economics, University of Paderborn, Warburger Straße 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany, E-mail:

Published Online: 2015-08-26

Published in Print: 2015-12-01

Citation Information: Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 467–478, ISSN (Online) 1554-8597, ISSN (Print) 1079-2457, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2015-0020.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in