Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Caruso, Raul

Ed. by Böhmelt, Tobias / Bove, Vincenzo / Kibris, Arzu / Sekeris, Petros

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.39

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.182
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.224

Online
ISSN
1554-8597
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 21, Issue 4 (Dec 2015)

Issues

Volume 17 (2011)

Volume 4 (1996)

Volume 3 (1995)

Volume 2 (1994)

Volume 1 (1993)

Sustaining Civil Peace: A Configurational Comparative Analysis

Thomas Gries
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics, University of Paderborn, Warburger Straße 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany
  • Email:
/ Irene PalnauORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2039-8506
Published Online: 2015-08-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2015-0020

Abstract

While much work has been devoted to the causes and consequences of civil war, little has been done to explore the prerequisites for civil peace. We shift the focus from the determinants of war to the preconditions to sustain peace, and address the following question: Are there necessary or sufficient conditions for stable civil peace? We use Qualitative Comparative Analysis to approach this question. We do not find necessary conditions for civil peace, but distinct potentially sufficient paths. These are (i) the presence of a fully democratic regime and (ii) the presence of a strongly autocratic regime, with the latter further requiring either a) the absence of a youth bulge and non-miserable living conditions or b) the absence of ethnic tensions. The first type of civil peace is referred to as inherent civil peace whereas the second type is largely a result of strong repression and thus denoted coerced civil peace.

Keywords: civil war; civil peace; qualitative comparative analysis

JEL Classification:: B50; F52; H10

References

  • Bara, C., (2014), Incentives and Opportunities: A Complexity-Oriented Explanation of Violent Ethnic Conflict, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 696–710. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Blattman, C., Miguel, E., (2010), Civil War, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 3–57. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Chan, S., (2003), Explaining War Termination: A Boolean Analysis of Causes, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–66. [Crossref]

  • Collier, P., (2000), Rebellion as a Quasi-Criminal Activity, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 839–853. [Crossref]

  • Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., (2004), Greed and Grievance in Civil War, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 563–595. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., Rohner, D., (2009), Beyond Greed and Grievance: Feasibility and Civil War, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 61, pp. 1–27. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Fearon, J.D., (2004), Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others?, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 275–301. [Crossref]

  • Fearon, J.D., Laitin, D.D., (1996), Explaining Interethnic Cooperation, American Political Science Review, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 715–735. [Crossref]

  • Fearon, J.D., Laitin, D.D., (2003), Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War, American Political Science Review, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 75–90. [Crossref]

  • Goldstone, J.A., Bates, R.H., Epstein, D.L., Gurr, T.R., Lustik, M.B., Marshall, M.G., Ulfelder, J., Woodward, M., (2010), A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 190–208. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Hegre, H., Ellingsen, T., Gates, S., Gleditsch, N.P., (2001), Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816-1992, American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 33–48.

  • Humphreys, M., (2005), Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: Uncovering the Mechanisms, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 508–537. [Crossref]

  • Huntington, S.P., (1996), The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.

  • Khan, M., (2002, July 27), To Keep The Peace, Study Peace, The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/27/arts/to-keep-the-peace-study-peace.html.

  • Kogut, B., Ragin, C., (2006), Exploring Complexity When Diversity is Limited: Institutional Complementarity in Theories of Rule of Law and National Systems Revisited, European Management Review, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 44–59. [Crossref]

  • Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N.P., Gilmore, E., (2005), A Diamond Curse? Civil War and a Lootable Resource, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 538–562. [Crossref]

  • Mesquida, C., Wiener, N., (1999), Male Age Composition and Severity of Conflicts, Politics and the Life Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 181–189.

  • Metelits, C.M., (2009), The Consequences of Rivalry: Explaining Insurgent Violence Using Fuzzy Sets, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 673–684. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Ragin, C.C., (2000), Fuzzy-Set Social Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Ragin, C.C., (2006), Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating their Consistency and Coverage, Political Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 291–310. [Crossref]

  • Rihoux, B., Ragin, C.C., (2009), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 51, Sage, Los Angeles, Calif.

  • Ron, J., (2005), Paradigm in Distress?, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 443–450. [Crossref]

  • Sambanis, N., (2002), A Review of Recent Advances and Future Directions in the Quantitative Literature on Civil War, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 13, pp. 215–243. [Crossref]

  • Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C., (2006), Reducing Complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Remote and Proximate Factors and The Consolidation of Democracy, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 751–786. [Crossref]

  • Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C., (2007), Qualitative Comparative Analysis und Fuzzy Sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen, Budrich, Opladen.

  • Urdal, H., (2004), The Devil in the Demographics: The Effect of Youth Bulges on Domestic Armed Conflict, 1950-2000, CPR Working Paper no. 14.

  • Urdal, H., (2006), A Clash of Generations? Youth Bulges and Political Violence, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 607–629. [Crossref]

About the article

Corresponding author: Thomas Gries, Department of Economics, University of Paderborn, Warburger Straße 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany, E-mail:


Published Online: 2015-08-26

Published in Print: 2015-12-01



Citation Information: Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, ISSN (Online) 1554-8597, ISSN (Print) 1079-2457, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2015-0020. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in