Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

Editor-in-Chief: Caruso, Raul

Ed. by Bove, Vincenzo / Kibris, Arzu / Sekeris, Petros

CiteScore 2017: 0.54

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.304
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.540

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 21, Issue 4


Volume 17 (2011)

Volume 4 (1996)

Volume 3 (1995)

Volume 2 (1994)

Volume 1 (1993)

Choosing to Intervene: US Domestic Politics and Moral Imperatives

Roberta Haar / Lutz F. Krebs
  • Corresponding author
  • United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Boschstraat 24, Maastricht 6211 AX, The Netherlands
  • Maastricht University, Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Postbus 616, Maastricht 6200MD, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2015-12-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2015-0030


The end of the Cold War meant fewer constraints on humanitarian intervention, and the third pillar of the nascent R2P norm suggests at least a moral imperative to intervene when another country’s population is threatened. Yet US leaders continue to shy away from protecting innocents outside of the United States from harm — despite the fact that presidential candidates often campaign on restoring America’s moral lead in the world and, in particular, on US responsibilities to avert mass atrocities. This paper investigates the extent to which US military intervention abroad is driven by domestic considerations. Using logistic regression analysis, we aim to explain decisions by Presidents Bush Sr., Clinton and Bush Jr. to send troops into harms way.

Keywords: foreign policy; military intervention; domestic political pressures; USA


  • Barbieri, K., Keshk, O.M.G., (2012), Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 3.0, retrieved from http://correlatesofwar.org.

  • Barbieri, K., Keshk, O.M.G., Pollins, B., (2009), Trading Data: Evaluating Our Assumptions and Coding Rules, Conflict Management and Peace Science, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 471–491.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baum, M., (2004), How Public Opinion Constrains the Use of Force: The Case of Operation Restore Hope, Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 187–226.Google Scholar

  • Bueno De Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R.M., Morrow, J.D., (2003), The Logic of Political Survival, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

  • Carey, H.F., (2001), U.S. Domestic Politics and the Emerging Humanitarian Intervention Policy: Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo, World Affairs, vol. 164, no. 2, pp. 72–82.Google Scholar

  • Cederman, L.E., Hug, S., Krebs, L.F., (2010), Democratization and Civil War: Empirical Evidence, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 377–394.Google Scholar

  • Choi, S.W., James, P., (2014), Why Does the United States Intervene Abroad? Democracy, Human Rights Violations, and Terrorism, Journal of Conflict Resolution, advance online publication, doi: 10.1177/0022002714560350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gleditsch, N.P., Wallensteen, P., Eriksson, M., Sollenberg, M., Strand, H., (2002), Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 615–637.Google Scholar

  • Haar, R., (2015), When Does the United States Intervene Militarily for Humanitarian Reasons? Politics & Policy, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 287–314.Google Scholar

  • Hagan, J., (1995), Domestic Political Explanations in the Analysis of Foreign Policy, in Neack, L., Hey, J.A.K., Haney, P.J., (eds.), Foreign Policy Analysis: Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 117–143.Google Scholar

  • Heston, A., Summers, R., Aten, B., (2012), Penn World Table Version 7.1 [data set], retrieved from http://www.rug.nl/research/ggdc/data/pwt/pwt-7.1.

  • Hildebrandt, T., Hillebrecht, C., Holm, P.M., Pevehouse, J., (2013), The Domestic Politics of Humanitarian Intervention: Public Opinion, Partisanship, and Ideology, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 243–266.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Larson, E.V., Savych, B., (2005), American Public Support for U.S. Military Operations from Mogadishu to Baghdad, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar

  • Lyon, A.J., Dolan, C., (2007), American Humanitarian Intervention: Toward a Theory of Coevolution, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ostrom, C.W., Job, B.L., (1986), The President and the Political Use of Force, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 2, 541–566.Google Scholar

  • Pearson, F.S., Baumann, R.A., (1993), International Military Intervention, 1946–1988 [data set], Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Data Collection 6035, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

  • Pickering, J., Kisangani, E.F., (2009), The International Military Intervention Dataset: An Updated Resource for Conflict Scholars, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 589–599.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Risse-Kappen, T., (1991), Public Opinion, Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies, World Politics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 479–512.Google Scholar

  • Themnér, L., Wallensteen, P., (2014), Armed Conflict: 1946–2013, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 541–554.Google Scholar

  • Woolley, J.T., Peters, G., (2015), The American Presidency Project: Presidential Job Approval [data set], retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/popularity.php.

About the article

Corresponding author: Lutz F. Krebs, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Boschstraat 24, Maastricht 6211 AX, The Netherlands, E-mail: ; and Maastricht University, Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Postbus 616, Maastricht 6200MD, The Netherlands

Published Online: 2015-12-08

Published in Print: 2015-12-01

Citation Information: Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 497–505, ISSN (Online) 1554-8597, ISSN (Print) 1079-2457, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2015-0030.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in