Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Perichoresis

The Theological Journal of Emanuel University

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.101
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.375

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2284-7308
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Psalms 16, 22, and 110. Historically Interpreted as Referring to Jesus

John E. McKinley
Published Online: 2012-09-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10297-012-0010-8

Psalms 16, 22, and 110. Historically Interpreted as Referring to Jesus

Three Christological Psalms, 16, 22, and 110 are troublesome to modern interpreters as they are used by New Testament writers. Scholars in earlier centuries had little difficulty following the ways these psalms seemed to be counted in the New Testament as predictions of Jesus. This interpretation was continued in the Reformation but is strongly questioned by conservative and critical scholars today. The argument reviews the contextual commentary for important quotations of these psalms in the New Testament, and examines the special content of the psalms to conclude that the earlier interpreters are more trustworthy guides. The unusual New Testament usage and strange content of the psalms warrants the application of exceptional hermeneutical principles to read them properly in the biblical canon. The implications for a Christological reading of these psalms are explored for theological and practical value.

Keywords: Psalm 16; Psalm 22; Psalm 110; Christology; Jesus

  • Calvin, John. Commentary on the Psalms, Calvin’s Commentaries, IV. Translated by James Anderson. Reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2009. Google Scholar

  • Craig A. Blaising and Carmen S. Hardin. “Psalms 1-50”. Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture, Old Testament, VII. Downers Grove, IL: Inter- Varsity, 2008. Google Scholar

  • G. K. Beale and D. A. Carson, eds. Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007. Google Scholar

  • Goldingay, John. Psalms 1-41. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2006. Google Scholar

  • Kaiser, Walter. “Psalm 72: A Historical and Messianic Current Example of Antiochene Hermeneutical Theoria”. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society (2009): 257-70. Google Scholar

  • Kidner, Derek. “Psalms 1-72”. Tyndale Old Testament Commentary. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1973. Google Scholar

  • _____. “Psalms 73-150”. Tyndale Old Testament Commentary. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1975. Google Scholar

  • Luther, Martin. Select Works of Martin Luther. Volume IV. Translated by Henry Cole. London: Simpkin and Marshall, 1826. Google Scholar

  • Michaels, J. Ramsey. ”1 Peter”. Word Biblical Commentary. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1988.Google Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2012-09-20

Published in Print: 2012-06-01


Citation Information: Perichoresis, ISSN (Print) 2284-7308, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10297-012-0010-8.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in