Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Perichoresis

The Theological Journal of Emanuel University

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.101
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.375

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2284-7308
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A Transformed Beholder. Objective Beauty as the Impetus for Sanctification in the Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar

Sam Wellbaum
Published Online: 2012-09-20 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10297-012-0012-6

A Transformed Beholder. Objective Beauty as the Impetus for Sanctification in the Theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar

Here in the early 21st century, beauty is not what it once was. The Enlightenment has left beauty a subjective and inconsequential shade, barely resembling its former existence as a transcendental on par with goodness and truth. Can beauty be restored to what it once was? And if it can, should it? This article argues that 20th century theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar not only answers these two questions with a resounding “Yes!” but also gives the church the tools needed to restore beauty to a place of honor in Christian theology. For von Balthasar, beauty and glory are one in the same. Further, beauty/glory and love are irrevocably connected. When we restore beauty to its proper place, we experience God’s love in a proper way, which in turn leads to sanctification.

Keywords: Beauty; Sanctification; Glory; Sublime; Love

  • Gibson, Michael “The Beauty of the Redemption of the World: The Theological Aesthetics of Maximus the Confessor and Jonathan Edwards”. The Harvard Theological Review 101.1 (2008). Google Scholar

  • Crokett, Clayton. Theology of the Sublime. London: Routledge, 2001. Google Scholar

  • Dubay, Thomas. The Evidential Power of Beauty. Science and Theology Meet. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1999. Google Scholar

  • Hanby, Michael. “Triunity, Creation, and Aesthetic Rationality”. American Theological Inquiry 1.2 (2008): 38-62. Google Scholar

  • Hart, David Bentley. The Beauty of Infinite. The Aesthetics of Christian Truth. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003. Google Scholar

  • Hofer, Andrew. “Proclamation in the Theological Aesthetics of Hans Urs von Balthasar” Worship 79.1 (2005): 20-38. Google Scholar

  • Kettler, Christian D. “The vicarious beauty of Christ: the aesthetics of the atonement”. Theology Today 64.1 (2007): 14-24. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Murphey, Francesca, ed. “Hans Urs von Balthasar: A Gateway to Love”. Theological Aesthetics After von Balthasar. Edited by Oleg Bychkov and James Fodor. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2008. Google Scholar

  • O’Donohue, John. Beauty. The Invisible Embrace. New York, NY: Harper Perennial, 2004. Google Scholar

  • Sartwell, Crispin. Six Names of Beauty. New York, NY: Routledge, 2006. Google Scholar

  • Scarry, Elaine. On Beauty and Being Just. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999. Google Scholar

  • Scruton, Roger. Beauty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Engagement with God. Translated by R. John Halliburton. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1975. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics, I. Seeing the Form. Edited by Joseph Fessio and John Riches. Translated by Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1982. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics; II. Studies in Theological Style. Clerical Styles. Edited by John Riches. Translated by Andrew Louth, Francis McDonagh and Brian McNeil. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1984. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics, III. Studies in Theological Style. Lay Styles. Edited by John Riches and Joseph Fessio. Translated by Andrew Louth, John Saward, Martin Simon and Rowan Williams. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1986. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics, IV. The Realm of Metaphysics in Antiquity. Edited by John Riches. Translated by Oliver Davies et al. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1989. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics; V. The Realm of Metaphysics in the Modern Age. Edited by Brian McNeil and John Riches. Translated by Oliver Davies, Andrew Louth, John Sayward and Martin Simon. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1991. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics, VI. Theology. The Old Covenant. Translated by Brian McNeil and Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1991. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Glory of the Lord. A Theological Aesthetics; VII. Theology. The New Covenant. Translated by Brian McNeil. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1989. Google Scholar

  • _____. Love Alone Is Credible. Translated by D. C. Schindler. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 2004. Google Scholar

  • _____. Theo-drama. Theological Dramatics, II. Dramatis Personae. Man in God. Translated by Graham Harrison. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1976. Google Scholar

  • _____. Theo-drama. Theological Dramatics, III. Dramatis Personae. Persons in Christ. Translated by Graham Harrison. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1992. Google Scholar

  • _____. Theo-drama. Theological Dramatics, IV. The Action. Translated by Graham Harrison. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius, 1994. Google Scholar

  • Viladesau, Richard. “Theosis and beauty”. Theology Today 65.2 (2008): 180- 190.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article


Published Online: 2012-09-20

Published in Print: 2012-06-01


Citation Information: Perichoresis, ISSN (Print) 2284-7308, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10297-012-0012-6.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in