Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


The Theological Journal of Emanuel University

2 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.101
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.375

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …


Matthew S. Harding
Published Online: 2014-02-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2013-0003


Throughout the bulk of the Reformed Tradition’s history within both Europe and the United States, most scholars have dismissed pastor and theologian Moïse Amyraut as a seventeenth century French heretic whose actions and theology led to the demise of the Huguenots in France. However, upon further introspection into Amyraut’s claims as being closer to Calvin (soteriologically) than his Genevan successors, one finds uncanny parallels in the scriptural commentaries and biblical insight into the expiation of Christ between Calvin and Amyraut. By comparing key scriptural passages concerning the atonement, this article demonstrates that Reformed theologian Moïse Amyraut in fact propagated a universal atonement theory which parallels Calvin’s, both men ascribing to biblical faithfulness, a (humanistic) theological method, and similar hermeneutic. As such, both Calvin and Amyraut scripturally contend that God desires and provided the means for the salvation of the whole world. Further, the article demonstrates that Calvin’s successor, Theodore de Beza, could not in fact make the same claims as Amyraut, this article demonstrating that Beza went beyond Calvin’s scriptural approach to Christ’s expiation. Therefore, this article supports a more centrist approach from within and outside the Reformed tradition by demonstrating that Calvin and Amyraut concentrically held to God’s gracious provision in Christ for the saving of the whole world, for those who would believe in Christ for salvation.

KEYWORDS: Amyraut; Calvin; Atonement Theory; Expiation; Beza


  • Amyraut, Moïse. Brief Traitté de la Prédestination et Ses Principales Dépendances. Saumur: Lesnier & Desbordes, 1634. Google Scholar

  • _____. Defense de la Doctrine de Calvin Sur le Sujet de l’Election and Réprobation. Saumur: Isaac Desbordes, 1644. Google Scholar

  • _____. Dissertationes Theologicae. Six volumes. Saumur: Desbordes, 1645. Google Scholar

  • _____. L’Eschantillon de la Doctrine de Calvin Touchant la Predestination. Saumur: Desbordes, 1658.Google Scholar

  • Beza, Theodore. A Briefe and Pithie Some of the Christian Faith Made in Forme of a Confession, with a Confutation of all Such Superstitious Errours, as Are Contrary Thereunto. Translated by Robert Fills. London: NP, 1563. Google Scholar

  • _____. Ad Acta Colloquii Montisbelgardensis Tubingae Edita Theodori Bezae Responsio Pars Altera. Geneva, 1588.Google Scholar

  • _____. A Booke of Christian Questions and Answers: Wherein are Set Forth the Chief Points of the Christian Religion. Translated by Arthur Golding. London: W. How, 1574.Google Scholar

  • _____. Cours sur Les Epîtres aux Romains et aux Hebrieux l564-66: d’Après Les Notes de Marcus Widler. Edited by P. Fraenkel and L. Perrotet. Geneva: NP, 1988. Google Scholar

  • _____. Novum Testamentum, 1560 edition. New York: D. Appleton, 1861. Google Scholar

  • _____. Propositions and Principles of Divinity. Translated by Antoine de la Faye. Edinburg: Waldegraue, 1585. Google Scholar

  • _____. Quaestionum et Responsionum Christianarum Pars Altera: Quae Est de Sacramentis. Geneva, 1576. Google Scholar

  • _____. Tractiones Theologicae. Three volumes. Geneva, 1570-1582.Google Scholar

  • Calvin, John. Calvin’s Commentaries. Twenty one volumes. Translated by W. Pringle. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2009. Google Scholar

  • _____. Concerning the Eternal Predestination of God. Translated by J. K. S. Reid. London, 1961. Google Scholar

  • _____. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Edited by John T. McNeill. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Two volumes. The Library of Christian Classics 20-21. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1960. Institutio Christianae Religionis. Volumes 3-5 of Joannis Calvini opera selecta. Edited by P. Barth and G. Niesel. Five volumes. Munich: Kaiser, 1926-36. Google Scholar

  • _____. Sermons on Isaiah’s Prophecy of the Death and Passion of Christ. Translated by T.Google Scholar

  • H. L. Parker. London: James Clarke & Co., 2002.Google Scholar

  • Armstrong, Brian G. Calvinism and the Amyraut Heresy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969.Google Scholar

  • Barnes, Tom. Atonement Matters: A Call to Declare the Biblical View of the Atonement. Webster, N.Y: Evangelical Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Beilby, James and Paul R. Eddy, eds. The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views. Downers Grove: IVP, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Cottret, Bernard. “Calvin, Etait-Il Calviniste?” Bulletin Du Centre Protestant D’Etudes 7 (2009): 4-18.Google Scholar

  • Dever, Mark and Michael Lawrence, eds. It is Well: Expositions on Substitutionary Atonement. Wheaton: Crossway, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Douty, Norma, F. Did Christ Die Only for the Elect? A Treatise on the Extent of the Atonement. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Fluhrer, Gabriel, ed. Atonement. Phillipsburg, NJ: P. and R. Publishing, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Hill, Charles, E. and Frank A. James III, eds. The Glory of the Atonement: Biblical, Theological, and Practical Perspectives. Downers Grove, MI: IVP, 2004.Google Scholar

  • Kendall, R. T. Calvin and English Calvinism to 1649. UK: Paternoster Press, 1997.Google Scholar

  • Kennedy, Kevin. Union with Christ and the Extent of the Atonement. Bern: Peter Lang, 2002.Google Scholar

  • Kuiper, R. B. For Whom Did Christ Die? A Study of the Divine Design of the Atonement. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar

  • Kuiper, H. Calvin on Common Grace. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1928.Google Scholar

  • Lightner, Robert Paul. The Death Christ Died. A Case for Unlimited Atonement. Des Plaines, Ill: Regular Baptist Press, 1967.Google Scholar

  • Long, Gary, D. Definite Atonement. Frederick, MD: New Covenant Media, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Moore, Jonathan. English Hypothetical Universalism. John Preston and the Softening of Reformed Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Muller, Richard, A. After Calvin: Studies in the Development of a Theological Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

  • Murray, John. For Whom Did Christ Die? The Extent of the Atonement. Birmingham: Solid Ground Christian Books, 2010.Google Scholar

  • Packer, J. I. and Mark Dever. In My Place Condemned He Stood: Celebrating the Glory of the Atonement. Wheaton: Crossway, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Peterson, Robert, A. Calvin and the Atonement. Geanies House, Scotland: Mentor, 2009.Google Scholar

  • Stauffer, Richard. Moïse Amyraut: Un Précurseur Français De L’OEcuménisme. Paris: Cahors, 1962. Google Scholar

  • _____. The Quest for Church Unity: From John Calvin to Isaac d’Huisseau. Allison Park, PA: Pickwick Publications, 1986.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, Michael G. “The Extent of the Atonement: A Dilemma for Reformed Theology from Calvin to the Consensus (1536-1675)”. Studies in Christian History and Thought. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar

  • Bell, M. Charles. “Calvin and the Extent of the Atonement”. The Evangelical Quarterly 55 (l983): 115-123. Cook, Peter. “Calvin and the Atonement”. A Review in Evangelical Quarterly 74.3 (2002): 279.Google Scholar

  • De Lima, Leandro Antonio. “Calvino Ensinou a Expiação Limitada?” Fides Reformata 9.1 (2004): 77-99.Google Scholar

  • Gerrish, B. A. “Union with Christ and the Extent of the Atonement in Calvin”. A Review in Theology Today 61.1 (2004): 142-144.Google Scholar

  • Gomes, Alan W. “Faustus Socinus and John Calvin on the Merits of Christ”. Reformation & Renaissance Review: Journal of the Society for Reformation Studies 12.2-3 (2010): 189-205.Google Scholar

  • Gunton, Colin. “Aspects of Salvation: Some Unscholastic Themes from Calvin's Institutes”. International Journal of Systematic Theology 1.3 (1999): 253.Google Scholar

  • Kleinman, Ruth. “Calvinismus Und Franzosische Monarchie Im 17. Jahrhundert”. American Historical Review 82.4 (1977): 977.Google Scholar

  • Macleod, Donald. “Amyraldus Redivivus: A Review Article”. Evangelical Quarterly 81.3 (2009): 210-229.Google Scholar

  • McGowan, A. T. B. “Amyraldianism. Is It Modified Calvinism?/ Amyraut Affirmed”. Evangelical Quarterly 77.2 (2005): 186-187. “Moïse Amyraut”. 1-1: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

  • Moore, Jonathan D. “Calvin versus the Calvinists? The Case of John Preston (1587-1628)”. Reformation & Renaissance Review: Journal of the Society for Reformation Studies 6.3 (2004): 327-348.Google Scholar

  • Placher, William C., John Flett, Michael Purcell, Lain Taylor, Andrew T. Lincoln, Paul M. Collins, W. Ross Hastings, and Nathan R. Strunk. “Reviews”. International Journal of Systematic Theology 7.3 (2005): 316-342.Google Scholar

  • Rouwendal, P. L. “Calvin’s Forgotten Classical Position on the Extent of the Atonement: About Sufficiency, Efficiency, and Anachronism”. Westminster Theological Journal (2008): 317-335.Google Scholar

  • Witt, Jared L. “Union with Christ and the Extent of the Atonement in Calvin”. A Review in Renaissance Quarterly 58.2 (2005): 626-628.Google Scholar

  • Wright, Nigel G. “Predestination and Perseverance in the Early Theology of Jürgen Moltmann”. Evangelical Quarterly 83.4 (2011): 330-345.Google Scholar

  • Archibald, Paul N. “A Comparative Study of John Calvin and Theodore Beza on the Doctrine of the Extent of the Atonement”. PhD diss., Westminster Theological Seminary, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Berry, H. E. “The Amyraldian Controversy and its Implications for the Lutheran- Reformed Unity in the Doctrine of Grace”. BD thesis, Concordia Theological Seminary, 1970.Google Scholar

  • Chambers, N. A. “A Critical Examination of John Owen’s Argument for Limited Atonement in the Death of Death in the Death of Christ”, ThM thesis, Reformed Theological Seminary, 1998.Google Scholar

  • Daniel, C. “Hyper-Calvinism and John Gill”. PhD diss., University of Edinburgh, 1983.Google Scholar

  • Godfrey, W. R. “Tensions within International Calvinism: The Debate on the Atonement at the Synod of Dort, 1618- 1619”. PhD diss., Stanford University, 1974.Google Scholar

  • Grohman, D. D. “The Genevan Reactions to the Saumur Doctrine of Hypothetical Universalism, 1635-1685”. ThD diss, Knox College in cooperation with Toronto School of Theology, 1971.Google Scholar

  • Harmon, Matthew Paul, “Moyse Amyraut’s Six Sermons: Directions for Amyrauldian Studies”. ThM thesis, Westminster Theological Seminary, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Nicole, R”. Moyse Amyraut (1596-1664) and the Controversy on Universal Grace: First Phase (1634-1637)”. PhD diss., Harvard University, 1966.Google Scholar

  • Nomura, S. “The Extent of the Atonement in Calvin’s Concept of the Preaching of the Gospel”. ThM thesis, Western Theological Seminary, 1991.Google Scholar

  • Proctor, L. “The Theology of Moïse Amyraut Considered as a Reaction Against Seventeenth- Century Calvinism”. PhD diss., University of Leeds, 1952.Google Scholar

  • Shultz, Gary L. “A Biblical and Theological Defense of a Multi-Intentioned View of the Atonement”. PhD diss., Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2008.Google Scholar

  • Wenkel, David, “John Bunyan’s Theory of Atonement in His Early Doctrinal and Polemic Works Amyraldian or Particular?” MA thesis, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, 2004. Google Scholar

About the article

Matthew S. Harding

Teacher and pastor, MATTHEW S. HARDING is pursuing his PhD in Historical Theology from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, TX, and holds a DMin in Church Leadersh

Published Online: 2014-02-13

Published in Print: 2013-06-01

Citation Information: Perichoresis, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 51–75, ISSN (Online) 2284-7308, ISSN (Print) 1224-984X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2013-0003.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in