Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Perichoresis

The Theological Journal of Emanuel University

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.101

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2284-7308
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Reformed Orthodoxy on Imputation. Active and Passive Justification

John V. Fesko
  • Westminster Seminary California
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-10-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/perc-2016-0016

Abstract

The doctrine of imputation is common to Early Modern Lutheran and Reformed theology, but Reformed orthodox theologians employed the distinction between the active and passive justification of the believer. Active justification is the objective imputation of Christ’s righteousness and passive justification is the subjective reception of the same. This distinction is a unique contribution in Reformed orthodox dogmatics and was used in polemics against Roman Catholic, Arminian, and Socinian theologians. This essay also compares Reformed orthodox formulations with Lutheran orthodox understandings of how they preserved the extra nos of Christ’s righteousness in justification. The Reformed orthodox employed the active-passive justification distinction in conjunction with the decree and the doctrine of the covenant of redemption, whereas the Lutheran orthodox logically placed justification first in the order of salvation. Both groups maintain the extra nos of Christ’s imputed righteousness but do so in different ways.

Keywords: imputation; active justification; passive justification; justification; union with Christ

Bibliography

  • Á Brakel W (1993) The Christian’s Reasonable Service, 4 volumes. Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria.

  • Ames W (1630) Medulla S. S. Theologiae. London: Robert Allot.

  • Ames W (1968) The Marrow of Theology. Eusden J (trans). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

  • Arand C, Kolb R, and Nestingen J, eds (2012) The Lutheran Confessions. History and Theology of ‘The Book of Concord’. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

  • Bavinck H (2003-08) Reformed Dogmatics, 4 volumes. Bolt J (ed), Vriend J (trans). Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.

  • Beeke J and Jones M (2012) A Puritan Theology. Doctrine for Life. Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books.

  • Bellarmine R (1610) De Iustificatione, in Disputationum Roberti Bellarmini, volume 3: De Controversiis Christianae Fidei. Leiden: Ioannes Pillehotte.

  • Berkhof L (1996) Systematic Theology, New Combined Edition. 1932, 1938; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

  • Beza T, ed (1586) An Harmony of the Confessions of the Faith of the Christian and Reformed Churches. Cambridge: Thomas Thomas.

  • Beza T (1592) Apologia Pro Iustificatione Per Unius Christi Viva Fide Apprehensi Iustitiam Gratis Imputatam. Geneva: Oannes le Preux.

  • Boersma H (2004) A Hot Pepper Corn. Richard Baxter’s Doctrine of Justification in Its Seventeenth-Century Context of Controversy. Vancouver: Regent College Publishing.

  • Brown of Wamphray J (1695) The Life of Justification Opened. Utrecht.

  • Calvin J (1559) Institutio Christianae Religionis. Geneva: Robert Stephanus.

  • Calvin J (1960) Institutes of the Christian Religion. Battles F (trans). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

  • Calvin J (2009) Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, with the Antidote, 1547. In John Calvin: Tracts and Letters. Volume 3. Beveridge H, ed (1844). Edinburgh: Banner of Truth.

  • Fesko J (2012) Beyond Calvin. Union with Christ and Justification in Early Modern Reformed Theology (1517-1700). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • Fesko J (2014) Arminius on Justification. Reformed or Protestant? Church History and Religious Culture 94(1): 1-21.

  • Fesko J (2015) The Covenant of Redemption. Origins, Development, and Reception Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • Fichter J (1944) James Layñez—Jesuit. St. Louis: Herder Book Company.

  • Gelber H (2004) It Could Have Been Otherwise. Contingency and Necessity in Dominican Theology at Oxford, 1300-1350. Leiden: Brill.

  • Gillespie P (1677) The Ark of the Covenant Opened. London: Tho. Parkhurst.

  • Goodwin T (1681) An Exposition on the First, and Part of the Second Chapter, of the Epistle to the Ephesians. London: T. G.

  • Goodwin T (1692) Man’s Restauration by Grace. London: Thomas Goodwin.

  • Goudriaan A (2010) Justification by Faith and the Early Arminian Controversy. In Wisse M, Sarot M, and Otten W (eds) Scholasticism Reformed. Essays in Honour of Willem J. van Asselt. Leiden: Brill.

  • Heidegger J (1690) Tumulus Tridentini Concilii. Zurich: David Gessnerus.

  • Hollatz D (1763) Examen Theologicum Acromaticum Universam Theologiam. Leipzig: Breitkopfius et Fil.

  • Hunnius N (1663) Diaskepsis Theologica De fundamentali Dissensu Doctrinae Evangelicae-Lutheranae, et Calvinianae, seu Reformatae. Cum Praemia Consideratione Hypokriseos Calvinianae, Dordrechtana Synodo Proditae. Wittenberg: Fincelius.

  • Jäger J (1713) Pactum Patris ac Filii Aeternum, Tanquam Fundamentum Foederis Gratia, en Synopsis. Tuebingen: Reisius.

  • Jones M (2010) Why Heaven Kissed Earth. The Christology of the Puritan Reformed Orthodox Theologian, Thomas Goodwin (1600-80). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • Kolb R and Wengert T, eds (2000) The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. Minneapolis, MI: Fortress, 2000.

  • Layñez D (1886) Disputatio de justitia imputata. In Hartmannus Grisar (ed) Jacobi Lainez ‘Disputationes Tridentiae’, volume 2. Regensburg: Feliciani Rauch.

  • Luther M (1957) The Freedom of the Christian, in Luther’s Works, volume 31. Minneapolis, MI: Fortress.

  • Maccovius J (1656) Distinctiones et Regulae Theologicae ac Philosophicae. Oxford: Robert Blagravius.

  • Marckius J (1749) Compendium Theologiae Christianae Didactico-Elencticum. Amsterdam: Adrian Douci & Abr. A Paddenburg.

  • Maresius S (1659) Collegium Theologicume. Groningen: Franciscus Bronchorstius.

  • Mattes M (2014) Luther on Justification as Forensic and Effective. In Kolb R, Dingel I, and Batka L (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Martin Luther’s Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Maxcey C (1979) Double Justice, Diego Layñez, and the Council of Trent, Church History 48(3): 269-278. [Crossref]

  • Melanchthon P (2002) Confutation of Osiander (Sept 1555). In Lund E (ed) Documents from the History of Lutheranism 1517-1750. Minneapolis, MI: Fortress, 2002

  • Melanchthon P (1841) No. 5848: Iudicium de Osiandro. In Bretschneider C (ed) Corpus Reformatorum, volume 8. Halle: C. A. Schwetschke et Filium, 1841.

  • Muller R (1985) Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms: Drawn Principally from Protestant Scholastic Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.

  • Muller R (2007) Toward the Pactum Salutis: Locating the Origins of a Concept. Mid-America Journal of Theology 18(n.i.): 11-65.

  • Normore C (1984) Future Contingents. In Kretzman N, Kenny A, and Pinborg J (eds) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism 1100-1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • O’Malley J (2013) Trent. What Happened at the Council. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

  • Oberman H (1992) The Dawn of the Reformation. Essays in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Thought. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

  • Osiander A (1994) Disputatio de Iustificatione in Gesamtausgabe, volume 9. Güttersloher Verlagshaus.

  • Owen J (1674) Pneumatologia. Or a Discourse Concerning the Holy Spirit. London: Nathaniel Ponder.

  • Owen J (1677) Justification by Faith Through the Imputation of the Righteousness of Christ, Explained, Confirmed, & Vindicated. London: R. Boulster.

  • Quenstedt J (1691) Theologia Didactico-Polemica, Sive, Systema Theologicum. Wittenberg: Johannes Ludolphus Quenstedt.

  • Rijssen L (1695) Francisci Turretini S. S. Theologiae Doctoris & Professoris Compendium Theologiae Didactico-Elencticae. Amsterdam: Georgius Gallet.

  • Roberts F (1657) Medulla Bibliorum. The Mysterie and Marrow of the Bible. London: George Calvert.

  • Rutherford S (1636) Exercitationes Apologeticae Pro Divina Gratia. Amsterdam: Henricus Laurentius.

  • Savoy (1659) A Declaration of the Faith and Order Practiced in the Congregational Churches In England. London: John Field.

  • Schmid H (1899) The Doctrinal Theology of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. Hay C and Jacobs H (trans). Philadelphia: Lutheran Publication Society.

  • Schmidt S (1696) Articulorum Formulae Concordiae Repetitio. Strasbourg: Josias Staedelius.

  • Tipton L (2013) Biblical Theology and the Westminster Standards Revisited. Union with Christ and Justification Sola Fide. Westminster Theological Journal 75(1): 1-12.

  • Trelcatius L (1604) Scholastica & Methodica Locorum Communium S. Theologiae Institutio. Leiden.

  • Trelcatius L (1610) A Briefe Institution of the Common Places of Sacred Divinity. London: Francis Burton.

  • Tuckney A (1679) Praelectiones Theologicae. Amsterdam: Stephani Swart.

  • Turretin F (1992-97) Institutes of Elenctic Theology. Philipsburg, NJ: P & R.

  • Twisse W (1632) Vindicia Gratiae Potestatis ac Providentiae Dei. Amsterdam: John Jansonius.

  • Van Dixhoorn C (2009) The Strange Silence of Prolocutor Twisse. Predestination and Politics in the Westminster Assembly’s Debate over Justification. Sixteenth Century Journal 40(2): 395-418.

  • Wengert T (2012) Defending the Faith: Lutheran Responses to Andreas Osiander’s Doctrine of Justification, 1551-1559. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

  • Wengert T (2013) Philip Melanchthon and John Calvin against Andreas Osiander. Coming to Terms with Forensic Justification. In Holder R (ed) Calvin and Luther. The Continuing Relationship. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  • Westminster (1648) The Humble Advice of the Assembly of Divines, Now By Authority of Parliament Sitting At Westminster, Concerning a Confession of Faith. London.

  • Witsius H (1990) Economy of the Covenants between God and Man, 2 volumes. Escondido: Den Dulk Foundation.

  • Wittich C (1675) Theologia Pacifica. Leiden: Arnoldus Doude.

  • Wollebius J (1633) Christianae Theologiae Compendium. Basel: J. J. Genath.

  • Wollebius J (1965) Compendium Theologiae Christianae. In Beardslee J (trans) Reformed Dogmatics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Zanchi G (1590) De Natura Dei Seu De Divinis Attributis, Libri V. Neustadt: Matthaeus Harnisius.

About the article

Published Online: 2016-10-21

Published in Print: 2016-12-01



Citation Information: Perichoresis, ISSN (Online) 2284-7308, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/perc-2016-0016. Export Citation

© 2016 John V. Fesko, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in