Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Present Environment and Sustainable Development

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Evaluation Of Present-Day Climate-Induced Desertification In El-Dakhla Oasis, Western Desert Of Egypt, Based On Integration Of MEDALUS Method, GIS And RS Techniques.

Hossam Ismael
Published Online: 2015-10-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pesd-2015-0024


Limited to fourth percent or less of the country’s total land area, Egypt’s agricultural landscape is threatened by the repercussions of climate change, desertification, soil depletion, and looming water scarcity. Outside of the Nile river valley and scattered fertile pockets in the desert oases, the vast majority of land is desert: rocky, parched and unable to support conventional farming. According to Egyptian National Action Program 2005 (ENAP), Egypt covers an area of about one million km2 ~ 100 million hectares, out of which about of 76.5 thousands km2 ~ 7.6% of the total area are inhabited, and the remaining (92.4%) area is desert. Desertification is a very complex process governed by several variables which influence each other. It is thus not possible to conclude for the general picture from a single factor alone. This process has a high rate in arid and hyper-arid countries such as Egypt. The main objective of this research was to evaluation the present-day climate-induced desertification in El-Dakhla Oasis, so in this study, the newest method for evaluating and mapping of desertification was used. The mathematic method was carried out by European Commission (EC), (MEditerranean Desertification And Land Use) at the MEDALUS project and booked as ESAs in 1999 integrated with remote sensing and GIS. All indices of the model were revised before using, and regarding to the region condition these indices were defined as key indices which were: Temperature, precipitation, wind, albedo, ground water and soil benchmark, and each benchmark has some sub-layers getting from their geometric mean. Based on the MEDALUS model, each sub-benchmark was quantified according to its quality and given a weighting of between 1.0 and 2.0. All benchmarks should be reinvestigated and adjusted to local conditions. Ultimately, desertification severity was classified in four level including low, moderate, Severe and high Severe. ArcGIS 10 was used to analysis and prepares the layers of quality maps using the geometric mean to integrate the individual sub-indicator maps. In turn the geometric mean of six quality maps was used to generate a single desertification status map. Remote sensing data have great potential to improve models mapping spatial variability of temperature and precipitation since they are available as time worldwide, and have high spatial resolution. The HYDRA visualization software was used to measure the present surface albedo from MODIS product (MOD43C1). Results showed that 60% of the area is classified as Severe, 14 % as moderate and 12%, 16% as low and none affected by desertification respectively. In addition the climatic variations including rainfall, temperature, sunlight, wind indicators were the most important factors affecting desertification process in El-Dakhla Oasis.

Keywords: MEDALUS; Desertification and Environmental Sensitive Area


  • Arar A., Chenchouni H., Benabderrahmane M.C.(2009) Climate Change and Desertification Risks assessment in Aurès Region (Eastern of Algeria) by Using of Geomatic Data. Presented at the Int. Joint Assembly of IAMAS-IAPSOIACS “MOCA-2009”, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar

  • Sepehr & A. M. Hassanli & M. R. Ekhtesasi & J. B. Jamali (2007) Quantitative assessment of desertification in south of Iran using MEDALUS method, Environ Monit Assess (2007) 134:243–254.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bonan, G. B., (1998) The land surface climatology of the NCAR land surface model (LSM 1.0) coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3), J. Clim., 11, 1307–1326.Google Scholar

  • Buermann, B., J. Dong, X. Zeng, R. B. Myneni, and R. E. Dickinson, (2001) Evaluation of the utility of satellite-based vegetation leaf area index data for climate simulations, J. Clim., 14, 3536– 3550.Google Scholar

  • Friedl, M. A., et al., (2002) Global land cover from MODIS: Algorithms and early results, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 287– 302.Google Scholar

  • Frattaruolo, F., Pennetta, L., Piccarreta, M. (2008). Desertification vulnerability map of Tavoliere, Apulia (Southern Italy). Journal of Maps, 117-125.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • IPCC. (2001). Climate Change: The Scientific Basic - Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Eds.: J. T. Houghton et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • IPCC. (2007). Climate Change (2007): The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Eds.: S. Solomon et al., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

  • Gad, A. (2008) : Future vision on the application of recent techniques in fields of soil survey and mapping, A working document submitted to the forum organized by the National comity of soil sciences, Academy of Scientific Research and Technology. Egypt, May 18-19.Google Scholar

  • Gad, A. and Lotfy, I. (2007) : Combined GIS and Remote Sensing techniques in Mapping Desertification Sensitivity in the North of the Western Desert, Egypt, Paper submited to the Second National GIS Symposium in Saudi Arabia, Al-Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, April 23-25, 2007/Rabi II 6-8, 1428, http://www.saudigis.org/papers.aspx.

  • Gao, F., Y. Jin, X. Li, C. B. Schaaf, and A. H. Strahler (2002), Bidirectional NDVI and atmospherically resistant BRDF inversion for vegetation canopy, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 40(6), 1269– 1278.Google Scholar

  • G., Aru A. and Pulina G. (Eds) “Land Use and Soil Degradation: MEDALUS in Sardinia”. Università degli studi di Sassari, pp. 231 – 238.Google Scholar

  • Hall, D., G. Riggs, V. Salomonson, N. DiGirolamo, and K. Bayr, (2002) MODIS snow-cover products, Remote Sens. Environ., 83, 181– 194.Google Scholar

  • Hasanien, G. H.; Gameh, M. A. and Talaat, A (2010) suitability of utilizing shallow groundwater in irrigating different soil in EL-Kharga Oasis. Ass. Univ. Bull. Environ. Res. Vol. 13 No. 2.Google Scholar

  • Kosmas C., KirkbyM., Geeson N. (Ed), (1999) The Medalus project: Mediterranean desertification and land use. Manual on key indicators of desertification and mapping environmentally sensitive areas to desertification. European Union, pp. 31-47.Google Scholar

  • Li, X.R.; Jia, X.H.; Dong, G.R. (2006) Influence of desertification on vegetation pattern variations in the cold semi-arid grasslands of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Northwest China. J. Arid. Environ. 64, 505-522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • M. Greco, D. Mirauda, G. Squicciarino, V. Telesca (2005) Desertification risk assessment in southern Mediterranean areas. Advances in Geosciences, European Geosciences Union (EGU), 2005, 2, pp.243-247. hal-00296891. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr

  • Oleson, K.W., G. B. Bonan, C. B. Schaaf, F. Gao, Y. Jin, and A. H. Strahler (2003), Assessment of global climate model land surface albedo using MODIS data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(8), 1443, doi:10.1029/2002GL016749.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Önol, B., Semazzi, F.H.M. (2009). Regionalization of climate change simulations over the Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Climate 22, 1944-1960.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pinet, P.C.; Kaufmann, C.; Hill, J. (2006) Imaging spectroscopy of changing Earth’s surface: a major step toward the quantitative monitoring of land degradation and desertification. C. R. Geosci. 338, 1042-1048.Google Scholar

  • Rubio J.L. and Bochet E., (1998), Desertification indicators as diagnosis criteria for desertification risk assessment in Europe. Journal of Arid Environments, 39(2): 113-120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Su, Y.Z.; Zhao, W.Z.; Su, P.X.; Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, T.; Ram, R. (2007) Ecological effects of desertification control and desertified land reclamation in an oasis-desert ecotone in an arid region: A case study in Hexi Corridor, northwest China. Ecol. Eng. 29, 117-124.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Santini M., Caccamo G., Laurenti A., Noce S., Valentini R. (2010) A multi-component GIS framework for desertification risk assessment, by an integrated index. Applied Geography, 30: 394-415.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Udelhoven, T.; Emmerling, C.; Jarmer, T. (2003) Quantitative analysis of soil chemical properties with diffuse reflectance spectrometry and partial least-square regression: A feasibility study. Plant Soil 2003, 251, 319-329.Google Scholar

  • UNEP. (1997) World Atlas of Desertification, 2nd Ed. UNEP Edition, Ch. 1.Google Scholar

  • UNCCD. (2008) Desertification – Coping with Today’s Global Challenges in the Context of theGoogle Scholar

  • UNEP & WMO (United Nations Environment Programme & World MeteorologicalOrganization), 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Climate Change Secretariat, Geneva.Google Scholar

  • Wigley TML & Raper SCB, 1992. Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature 357: 293–324.Google Scholar

  • World Bank, 1992. World Development Report 1992. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

  • Wu, B.; Ci, L.J. (2002) Landscape change and desertification development in the Mu Us Sandland, Northern China. J. Arid. Environ. 50, 429-444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhao, H.L.; Zhou, R.L.; Zhang, T.H.; Zhao, X.Y. (2006) Effects of desertification on soil and crop growth properties in Horqin sandy cropland of Inner Mongolia, north China. Soil. Till. Res. 87, 175-185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zeng, X., M. Shaikh, Y. Dai, R. E. Dickinson, and R. B. Myneni, (2002) Coupling of the common land model to the NCAR community climate model, J. Clim., 14, 1832– 1854.Google Scholar

  • Zehtabian, Gh., Rafiei Emam. (2003) “ESAs”, a new method for evaluation and preparation of susceptible regions to desertification, Biaban, Vol. 8, No. 1; 120-126.Google Scholar

  • Zehtabian, Gh., et al. (2006) the Reapplication of MEDALUS Methodology in Kashan Desertified Region, Iran. 14th International Soil Conservation Organization Conference. Water Management and Soil Conservation in Semi-Arid Environments. Marrakech, Morocco, May 14-19, 2006.Google Scholar

  • Zhou, L., et al. (2003), Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of albedo from MODIS and common land model, J. Geophys. Res, 108(D15), 4488, doi:10.1029/2002JD003326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-10-29

Published in Print: 2015-10-01

Citation Information: Present Environment and Sustainable Development, Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 47–72, ISSN (Online) 2284-7820, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pesd-2015-0024.

Export Citation

© 2015 Hossam Ismael, published by De Gruyter Open. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

B.A.B. Blackwell, A.R. Skinner, J.R. Smith, C.L. Hill, C.S. Churcher, J.M. Kieniewicz, K.A. Adelsberger, J.I.B. Blickstein, J.A. Florentin, A.E. Deely, and K.V. Spillar
Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2017

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in