Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Founded in 1846!

Philologus

Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption / A Journal for Ancient Literature and its Reception

Ed. by Föllinger, Sabine / Fuhrer, Therese / Reinhardt, Tobias / Stenger, Jan / Vöhler, Martin


CiteScore 2017: 0.06

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.116

Online
ISSN
2196-7008
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 153, Issue 1

Issues

A Dove and a Nightingale: Mahābhārata 3. 130. 18–3. 131. 32 and Hesiod, works and days 202–213

Andreas Zanker
Published Online: 2009-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.2009.0002

Abstract

Hesiod’s Fable of the Hawk and the Nightingale remains a scholarly problem: its “might is right” moral seems to counteract the point that the poet appears to be making in this part of the Works and Days. Moreover, it is introduced with an address to the kings but finishes immediately prior to a dislocated appellation to Hesiod’s brother Perses. We have no clearly analogous fable to set next to this one. In this paper I step outside the Greek tradition and present a comparable story from the Indic Mahābhārata that involves not only a hawk and a dove but also a king who protects the latter. I argue that the material it supplies can help us in our interpretation of the Hesiodic fable by opening up the possibility that there is in fact a third character within the drama – absent from the text itself but essential for our understanding of it – who had the power to protect the nightingale from the hawk but who failed to do so.

Keywords: Hesiod; Mahabharata; Hawk and Nightingale

About the article

Published Online: 2009-09-25

Published in Print: 2009-07-01


Citation Information: Philologus, Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages 10–25, ISSN (Print) 0031-7985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.2009.0002.

Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in