Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Founded in 1846!

Philologus

Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption / A Journal for Ancient Literature and its Reception

Ed. by Föllinger, Sabine / Fuhrer, Therese / Reinhardt, Tobias / Stenger, Jan / Vöhler, Martin

2 Issues per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.06

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.116

Online
ISSN
2196-7008
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 161, Issue 1

Issues

Aristophanes’ Komödien als Lesetexte

Fabian Zogg
  • Corresponding author
  • Seminar für Griechische und Lateinische Philologie, Rämistraße 68, 8001 Zürich, Schweiz Seminar für Griechische und Lateinische Philologie8001 ZürichSwitzerland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2017-06-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2017-0001

Abstract

In current research, strongly marked by ‘performance studies’, it is often forgotten that there are at least two approaches in literary research that must concentrate on the reading of Aristophanes’ comedies: As his plays were read for centuries and still are, it is legitimate to pose research questions on the aesthetics of reception and of influence which address the reading of his text. The present paper will argue, further, that Aristophanes’ comedies were conceived right from the start as reading texts. Investigations of their reading are therefore all the more desirable as a complement to ‘performance studies’. In the argument presented here, first the conditions of reading in Aristophanes’ time are sketched out (1). Then it is shown how the poet of comedy was himself a reader, who may have expected a read reception of his own poetic compositions (2). The final part of the paper describes Aristophanes’ environment and asks who may have been among his readership.

Keywords: Aristophanes; Buch; Komödie; Lesetext; ‚Performance Studies‘

Verzeichnis der verwendeten Literatur

  • Aeschyli Septem quae supersunt tragoedias ed. D. L. Page, Oxford 1972. Google Scholar

  • Aristophanis Fabulae, ed. N. G. Wilson, Oxford 2007. Google Scholar

  • Euripidis Fabulae, ed. J. Diggle, Oxford 1981–1994. Google Scholar

  • Hymni Homerici, ed. T. W. Allen, Oxford 1946.Google Scholar

  • Poetae Comici Graeci, edd. R. Kassel/C. Austin, Berlin/New York 1983–. Google Scholar

  • Platonis Opera, ed. J. Burnet, Oxford 1900–1907. Google Scholar

  • Sophoclis Fabulae, edd. H. Lloyd-Jones/N. G. Wilson, Oxford 1990.Google Scholar

  • Thucydidis Historiae, edd. H. S. Jones/J. E. Powell, Oxford 1942. Google Scholar

  • Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol 5: Euripides, ed. R. Kannicht, Göttingen 2004. Google Scholar

  • M. Asper, „Group Laughter and Comic Affirmation: Aristophanes’ Birds and the Political Function of Old Comedy“, Hyperboreus 11, 2005, 5–29.Google Scholar

  • C. Austin/S. D. Olson, Aristophanes. Thesmophoriazusae, Oxford 2004.Google Scholar

  • G. W. Bakewell, „Written Lists of Military Personnel in Classical Athens“, in: C. Cooper (Hg.), Politics of Orality, Leiden 2007, 89–101.Google Scholar

  • J. D. Beazley, „Hymn to Hermes“, AJA 52, 1948, 336–340.Google Scholar

  • F. A. G. Beck, Album of Greek Education. The Greeks at School and at Play, Sydney 1975.Google Scholar

  • Z. P. Biles, Aristophanes and the Poetics of Competition, Cambridge 2011.Google Scholar

  • H. Blanck, Das Buch in der Antike, München 1992.Google Scholar

  • W. G. Boruchowitsch, „Aristophanes als Herausgeber seiner Komödien“, AAntHung 21, 1973, 89–95.Google Scholar

  • K. Bosher (Hg.), Theater outside Athens: Drama in Greek Sicily and South Italy, Cambridge 2012.Google Scholar

  • E. L. Bowie, „The Ups and Downs of Aristophanic Travel“, in: E. Hall/A. Wrigley (Hgg.), Aristophanes in Performance 421 BC–AD 2007: Peace, Birds and Frogs, London 2007, 32–51.Google Scholar

  • C. Brockmann, Aristophanes und die Freiheit der Komödie. Untersuchungen zu den frühen Stücken unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Acharner, München/Leipzig 2003.Google Scholar

  • A. Casanova, „La revisione delle Nuvole di Aristofane“, Prometheus 26, 2000, 19–34.Google Scholar

  • E. Csapo, „The Production and Performance of Comedy in Antiquity“, in: G. W. Dobrov (Hg.), Brill’s Companion to the Study of Greek Comedy, Leiden/Boston 2010, 103–142.Google Scholar

  • K. Diamantakou-Agathou, „Euripides versus Aristophanes, Ion versus Birds. A Possibility of ‚Paracomic‘ Referentiality“, Mediterranean Chronicle 2, 2012, 15–29.Google Scholar

  • K. J. Dover, Aristophanes. Clouds, Oxford 1968.Google Scholar

  • K. J. Dover, Aristophanic Comedy, Berkeley/Los Angeles 1972.Google Scholar

  • K. J. Dover, Aristophanes. Frogs, Oxford 1993.Google Scholar

  • N. Dunbar, Aristophanes. Birds, Oxford 1995.Google Scholar

  • U. Eco, Streit der Interpretationen, Konstanz 1987.Google Scholar

  • P. Fabrini, „Sulla rappresentabilità delle Nuvole di Aristofane“, ASNP 5, 1975, 1–16.Google Scholar

  • J. Fontenrose, The Delphic Oracle, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1978.Google Scholar

  • A. Ford, „From Letters to Literature: Reading the ‚Song Culture‘ of Classical Greece“, in: H. Yunis (Hg.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge 2003, 15–37.Google Scholar

  • T. Gelzer, „Aristophanes der Komiker“, RE Suppl. XII, 1970, 1392–1569.Google Scholar

  • T. Gelzer, „Frösche 1119–1410: Aristophanes der fleißige Spötter“, in: A. Kolde/A. Lukinovich/A.-L. Rey (Hgg.), Κορυφαίῳ ἀνδρί. Mélanges offerts à André Hurst, Genève 2005, 97–105.Google Scholar

  • S. Goldhill, „Modern Critical Approaches to Greek Tragedy“, in: P. E. Easterling (Hg.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, Cambridge 1997, 324–347.Google Scholar

  • E. Hall, The Theatrical Cast of Athens. Interactions between Ancient Greek Drama and Society, Oxford 2006.Google Scholar

  • W. V. Harris, Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA/London 1989.Google Scholar

  • M. Heath, „Aristophanes and His Rivals“, G&R 37, 1990, 143–158.Google Scholar

  • C. J. Herington, Poetry into Drama. Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1985.Google Scholar

  • T. K. Hubbard, „The Dissemination of Epinician Lyric: Pan-Hellenism, Reperformance, Written Texts“, in: C. J. Mackie (Hg.), Oral Performance and Its Context, Leiden 2004, 71–93.Google Scholar

  • T. K. Hubbard, „Theognis’ Sphrêgis: Aristocratic Speech and the Paradoxes of Writing“, in: C. Cooper (Hg.), Politics of Orality, Leiden 2007, 193–215.Google Scholar

  • T. K. Hubbard, „The Dissemination of Pindar’s Non-Epinician Choral Lyric“, in: L. Athanassaki/E. L. Bowie (Hgg.), Archaic and Classical Choral Song. Performance, Politics and Dissemination, Berlin/Boston 2011, 347–363.Google Scholar

  • A. Hughes, Performing Greek Comedy, Cambridge 2012.Google Scholar

  • R. L. Hunter, Eubulus. The Fragments, Cambridge 1983.Google Scholar

  • R. L. Hunter, Plato’s Symposium, Oxford 2004.Google Scholar

  • B. Huss, Xenophons Symposion. Ein Kommentar, Stuttgart/Leipzig 1999.Google Scholar

  • H. R. Immerwahr, „Book Rolls on Attic Vases“, in: C. Henderson (Hg.), Classical, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Berthold Louis Ullman, Bd. 1, Roma 1964, 17–48.Google Scholar

  • H. R. Immerwahr, „More Book Rolls on Attic Vases“, AK 16, 1973, 143–147.Google Scholar

  • W. Iser, Der Akt des Lesens: Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung, München 41994.Google Scholar

  • J. Kirkpatrick/F. Dunn, „Heracles, Cercopes, and Paracomedy“, TAPhA 132, 2002, 29–61.Google Scholar

  • B. M. W. Knox, „Books and Readers in the Greek World. From the Beginnings to Alexandria“, in: P. E. Easterling/B. M. W. Knox (Hgg.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Bd. 1, Cambridge 1985, 1–16.Google Scholar

  • N. Kyriakidi, Aristophanes und Eupolis. Zur Geschichte einer dichterischen Rivalität, Berlin 2007.Google Scholar

  • J. B. Lefkowitz, Rez. Sidwell (2009), BMCRev 2010.10.62.Google Scholar

  • N. J. Lowe, „Aristophanes’ Books“, Annals of Scholarship 10, 1993, 63–83.Google Scholar

  • W. Luppe, „The Rivalry between Aristophanes and Kratinos“, in: D. Harvey/J. Wilkins (Hgg.), The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, London 2000, 15–21.Google Scholar

  • D. M. MacDowell, Aristophanes and Athens. An Introduction to the Plays, Oxford 1995.Google Scholar

  • H.-I. Marrou, Geschichte der Erziehung im Klassischen Altertum, Freiburg/München 1957.Google Scholar

  • H. R. Marshall, „Clouds, Eupolis and Reperformance“, in: C. W. Marshall/G. Kovacs (Hgg.), No Laughing Matter. Studies in Athenian Comedy, London 2012, 55–68.Google Scholar

  • G. Mastromarco, „Trame allusive e memoria del pubblico (Acarn. 300–301 ~ Caval. 314)“, in: S. Boldrini (Hg.), Filologia e forme letterarie. Studi offerti a Francesco Della Corte, I, Urbino 1987, 239–243.Google Scholar

  • G. Mastromarco, „La paratragodia, il libro, la memoria“, in: E. Medda/M. S. Mirto/M. P. Pattoni (Hgg.), ΚΩΜΩΙΔΟΤΡΑΓΩΙΔΙΑ. Intersezioni del tragico e del comico nel teatro del V secolo a. C., Pisa 2006, 137–191.Google Scholar

  • P. von Möllendorff, Aristophanes, Hildesheim 2002.Google Scholar

  • T. J. Morgan, „Literate Education in Classical Athens“, CQ 49, 1999, 46–61.Google Scholar

  • G. F. Nieddu, „A Poet at Work: The Parody of Helen in the Thesmophoriazusae“, GRBS 44, 2004, 331–360.Google Scholar

  • M. Nøjgaard, La fable antique, Bd. 1, Kopenhagen 1964.Google Scholar

  • E. Olshausen, „Aristophanes und sein Athen. Geographisches und Prosopographisches zur Gesellschaftsstruktur des aristophaneischen Theaterpublikums“, Sileno 35, 2009, 95–109.Google Scholar

  • S. D. Olson, Aristophanes. Peace, Oxford 1998.Google Scholar

  • S. D. Olson, Broken Laughter. Select Fragments of Greek Comedy, Oxford 2007.Google Scholar

  • C. Pébarthe, Cité, Démocratie et Écriture. Histoire de l’alphabétisation d’Athènes à l’époque classique, Paris 2006.Google Scholar

  • F. Perusino, „Aristofane e i registi-poeti“, Helikon 20/21, 1980/1981, 63–73.Google Scholar

  • R. Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship. From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford 1968.Google Scholar

  • A. W. Pickard-Cambridge, The Dramatic Festivals of Athens, revised by J. Gould and D. M. Lewis, Oxford 31988.Google Scholar

  • P. M. Pinto, „Men and Books in Fourth-Century BC Athens“, in: J. König/K. Oikonomopoulou/G. Woolf (Hgg.), Ancient Libraries, Cambridge 2013, 85–95.Google Scholar

  • C. Platter, Aristophanes and the Carnival of Genres, Baltimore 2007.Google Scholar

  • B. B. Powell, Writing: Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization, Malden 2009.Google Scholar

  • P. Rau, Paratragodia. Untersuchung einer komischen Form des Aristophanes, München 1967.Google Scholar

  • M. Revermann, Comic Business: Theatricality, Dramatic Technique, and Performance Contexts of Aristophanic Comedy, Oxford 2006.Google Scholar

  • W. Rösler, „The Histories and Writing“, in: E. J. Bakker/I. J. F. de Jong/H. van Wees (Hgg.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus, Leiden 2002, 79–94.Google Scholar

  • R. M. Rosen, „Performance and Textuality in Aristophanes’ Clouds“, YJC 10, 1997, 397–421.Google Scholar

  • R. M. Rosen, „Cratinus’ Pytine and the Construction of the Comic Self“, in: D. Harvey/J. Wilkins (Hgg.), The Rivals of Aristophanes. Studies in Athenian Old Comedy, London 2000, 23–39.Google Scholar

  • R. M. Rosen, „Aristophanes“, in: G. W. Dobrov (Hg.), Brill’s Companion to the Study of Greek Comedy, Leiden/Boston 2010, 227–278.Google Scholar

  • I. A. Ruffell, Politics and Anti-Realism in Athenian Old Comedy: The Art of the Impossible, Oxford 2011.Google Scholar

  • C. F. Russo, Aristophanes. An Author for the Stage, London/New York 1994.Google Scholar

  • D. Sansone, Greek Drama and the Invention of Rhetoric, Chichester 2012.Google Scholar

  • E. W. Scharffenberger, „A Tragic Lysistrata? Jocasta in the ‚Reconciliation Scene‘ of the Phoenician Women“, RhM 138, 1995, 312–336.Google Scholar

  • E. W. Scharffenberger, „Euripidean ‚Paracomedy‘: A Re-Consideration of the Antiope“, T&P 17, 1996, 65–72.Google Scholar

  • S. Schirru, La Favola in Aristofane, Berlin 2009.Google Scholar

  • B. Seidensticker, Palintonos Harmonia: Studien zu komischen Elementen in der griechischen Tragödie, Göttingen 1982.Google Scholar

  • K. Sidwell, „Poetic Rivalry and the Caricature of Comic Poets: Cratinus’ Pytine and Aristophanes’ Wasps“, in: A. Griffiths (Hg.), Stage Directions: Essays in Ancient Drama in Honour of E.W. Handley, London 1995, 56–80.Google Scholar

  • K. Sidwell, Aristophanes the Democrat. The Politics of Satirical Comedy during the Peloponnesian War, Cambridge 2009.Google Scholar

  • M. S. Silk, Aristophanes and the Definition of Comedy, Oxford 2000.Google Scholar

  • M. S. Silk, „The Greek Dramatic Genres: Theoretical Perspectives“, in: E. Bakola/L. Prauscello/M. Telò (Hgg.), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres, Cambridge 2013, 15–39.Google Scholar

  • N. W. Slater, „Literacy and Old Comedy“, in: I. Worthington (Hg.), Voice into Text, Leiden 1996, 99–112.Google Scholar

  • N. W. Slater, „Dancing the Alphabet: Performative Literacy on the Attic Stage“, in: I. Worthington/J. M. Foley (Hgg.), Epea and Grammata. Oral and Written Communication in Ancient Greece, Leiden 2002, 117–129.Google Scholar

  • A. H. Sommerstein, The Comedies of Aristophanes. Vol. 8: Thesmophoriazusae, Warminster 1994.Google Scholar

  • A. H. Sommerstein, The Comedies of Aristophanes. Vol. 9: Frogs, Warminster 1996.Google Scholar

  • A. H. Sommerstein, The Comedies of Aristophanes. Vol. 11: Wealth, Warminster 2001.Google Scholar

  • A. H. Sommerstein, „The History of the Text of Aristophanes“, in: G. W. Dobrov (Hg.), Brill’s Companion to the Study of Greek Comedy, Leiden/Boston 2010, 399–422.Google Scholar

  • I. C. Storey, „Notus est omnibus Eupolis?“, in: A. H. Sommerstein/S. Halliwell/J. Henderson/B. Zimmermann (Hgg.), Tragedy, Comedy and the Polis, Bari 1993, 373–396.Google Scholar

  • I. C. Storey, Eupolis. Poet of Old Comedy, Oxford 2003.Google Scholar

  • J. Svenbro, Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, Ithaca 1993.Google Scholar

  • O. Taplin, The Stagecraft of Aeschylus. The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy, Oxford 1977.Google Scholar

  • O. Taplin, „Fifth-Century Tragedy and Comedy: A Synkrisis“, JHS 106, 1986, 163–174.Google Scholar

  • O. Taplin, „Opening Performance: Closing Texts?“, Essays in Criticism 45, 1995, 93–120.Google Scholar

  • R. Thomas, Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece, Cambridge 1992.Google Scholar

  • R. Thomas, „Writing, Reading, Public and Private ‚Literacies‘. Functional Literacy and Democratic Literacy in Greece“, in: W. A. Johnson/H. N. Parker (Hgg.), Ancient Literacies. The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford 2009, 13–45.Google Scholar

  • I. Torrance, „Writing and Self-Conscious Mythopoiēsis in Euripides“, CCJ 56, 2009/2010, 213–258.Google Scholar

  • E. G. Turner, Athenian Books in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries B. C., London 21977.Google Scholar

  • R. G. Ussher, Aristophanes. Ecclesiazusae, Oxford 1973.Google Scholar

  • S. Werner, „Literacy Studies in Classics: The Last Twenty Years“, in: W. A. Johnson/H. N. Parker (Hgg.), Ancient Literacies. The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford 2009, 333–382.Google Scholar

  • M. L. West, „The Ascription of Fables to Aesop in Archaic and Classical Greece“, in: F. R. Adrados (Hg.), La fable (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique, tome XXX), Genève 1984, 105–136.Google Scholar

  • U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Euripides. Herakles, Bd. 1, Darmstadt 1889.Google Scholar

  • U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, „Der Chor der Wolken des Aristophanes, 1921“, in: H.-J. Newiger (Hg.), Aristophanes und die Alte Komödie, Darmstadt 1975, 170–173.Google Scholar

  • A. Willi, The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek, Oxford 2003.Google Scholar

  • L. Woodbury, „Aristophanes’ Frogs and Athenian Literacy: Ran. 52–53, 1114“, TAPhA 106, 1976, 349–357.Google Scholar

  • M. Wright, The Comedian as Critic: Greek Old Comedy and Poetics, London 2012.Google Scholar

  • F. Zogg, Lust am Lesen: Literarische Anspielungen im Frieden des Aristophanes, München 2014.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-06-06

Published in Print: 2017-05-30


Citation Information: Philologus, Volume 161, Issue 1, Pages 1–18, ISSN (Online) 2196-7008, ISSN (Print) 0031-7985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2017-0001.

Export Citation

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in