Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Founded in 1846!


Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption / A Journal for Ancient Literature and its Reception

Ed. by Föllinger, Sabine / Fuhrer, Therese / Reinhardt, Tobias / Stenger, Jan / Vöhler, Martin

CiteScore 2018: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.867

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 163, Issue 1


Quaestiones Convivales: Plutarch’s Sense of Humour as Evidence of his Platonism

Anastasios Nikolaidis
Published Online: 2018-02-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2017-0029


Given Plutarch’s fragmentary piece on Aristophanes and Menander (Mor. 853A–854D), a piece of Table Talk on almost the same topic (Mor. 711A–713F) and various attacks on comic poets scattered through the Lives, one might believe that Plutarch is a staid, conservative and humourless author. But several other instances in his writings reveal a playful, facetious, witty and humorous Plutarch. This paper will focus on the Quaestiones Convivales, which bear ample witness to this aspect of Plutarch’s personality and authorial technique. It will examine the ways in which he introduces and describes the various interlocutors, discuss certain comments (or arguments) with which he tries to ridicule his philosophical opponents, notably the Stoics and the Epicureans, try to distinguish the various manifestations of Plutarch’s humour (spontaneous reaction, literary device, pleasantry, witticism, irony) and finally suggest that Plutarch’s stance and attitude towards playfulness, comic situations and laughter may ultimately be affected, at least in part, by his allegiance to Plato.

Keywords: witticisms; irony; Aristotle; Stoics; Epicureans


  • Epicurea, ed. H. Usener (Studia philologica 3), Roma 1963 (= Leipzig 1887). Google Scholar

  • Galen, Opera omnia, tom. I, ed. C. G. Kühn, Hildesheim 1964 (= Leipzig 1821).Google Scholar

  • Philodemi Περὶ κακιῶν liber decimus, ed. C. Jensen, Leipzig 1911.Google Scholar

  • Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. VI, English translation by W. C. Helmbold; vol. VIII by P. A. Clement/H. B. Hoffleit; vol. IX by E. L. Minar/F. H. Sandbach/W. C. Helmbold (LCL), London/Cambridge, MA 1939/1969/1961.Google Scholar

  • Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta (SVF), tom. I, ed. H. von Arnim, Stuttgart 1978 (= Leipzig 1905).Google Scholar

  • Z. Abramowiczówna, “Humor u Plutarcha”, Eos 54, 1964, 89–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • F. Amory, “eirôn and eirôneia”, C&M 33, 1982, 49–80.Google Scholar

  • E. Arndt, De ridiculi doctrina rhetorica, Bonn 1904.Google Scholar

  • D. Babut, “A propos des enfants et d’un ami de Plutarque: essai de solution pour deux énigmes”, REG 94, 1981, 47–62.Google Scholar

  • R. H. Barrow, Plutarch and His Times, London 1967.Google Scholar

  • W. Boder, Die sokratische Ironie in den platonischen Frühdialogen, Amsterdam 1973.Google Scholar

  • W. Büchner, “Über den Begriff der Eironeia”, Hermes 76, 1941, 339–358. Google Scholar

  • W. Christ/W. Schmid/O. Stählin, Geschichte der griechischen Literatur, vol. II.1, München 1920.Google Scholar

  • J. Diggle, Theophrastus: Characters, Cambridge 2004. Google Scholar

  • J. A. Fernández Delgado, “El sentido del humor de Plutarco”, in: J. A. Fernández Delgado/F. Pordomingo Pardo (eds.), Estudios sobre Plutarco: Aspectos formales, Madrid 1996, 381–403.Google Scholar

  • W. Fortenbaugh et al., Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought & Influence, Leiden/New York/Köln 1992.Google Scholar

  • F. Frazier/J. Sirinelli, Plutarque: Œuvres Morales, vol. IX.3 (CUF), Paris 1996. Google Scholar

  • F. Frazier, “Théorie et pratique de la παιδιὰ symposiaque dans les Propos de table de Plutarque”, in: M. Trédé/P. Hoffmann (eds.), Le rire des Anciens (Actes du colloque international, Université de Rouen), Paris 1998, 281–292.Google Scholar

  • F. Frazier, “Rires et rieurs dans l’œuvre de Plutarque”, in: M. L. Desclos (ed.), Le rire des Grecs: Anthropologie du rire en Grèce ancienne, Grenoble 2000, 469–494.Google Scholar

  • P. Friedländer, Plato. An Introduction, transl. by P. Meyerhoff, Princeton, NJ 21969.Google Scholar

  • F. Fuhrmann, Plutarque: Œuvres Morales, vol. IX.1 (CUF), Paris 1972.Google Scholar

  • H. Görgemanns et al., Plutarch: Dialog über die Liebe, Tübingen 2006.Google Scholar

  • A. M. Grant, The Ancient Rhetorical Theories of the Laughable, Madison, WI 1924.Google Scholar

  • P. Gray, “Humor and Religion in Plutarch’s Writings”, in: A. Pérez Jiménez/F. Titchener (eds.), Valori letterari delle opera di Plutarco: Studi offerti al Professore Italo Gallo dall’International Plutarch Society, Málaga/Logan 2005, 197–206.Google Scholar

  • C. L. Griswold Jr., “Irony in the Platonic Dialogues”, Ph&Lit 26, 2002, 84–106.Google Scholar

  • W. K. C. Guthrie, Socrates, Cambridge/London/New York 1971.Google Scholar

  • S. Halliwell, Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity, Cambridge 2008.Google Scholar

  • W. C. Helmbold, Plutarch’s Moralia, vol. IX (LCL), London/Cambridge, MA 1961.Google Scholar

  • B. P. Hillyard, Plutarch: De audiendo, New York 1981.Google Scholar

  • N. Holland, Laughing: A Psychology of Humor, Ithaca, NY 1982.Google Scholar

  • C. P. Jones, Plutarch and Rome, Oxford 1971.Google Scholar

  • G. Kennedy, A New History of Classical Rhetoric, Princeton, NJ 1994.Google Scholar

  • M. Lane, “The Evolution of eirôneia in Classical Greek Texts: Why Socratic eirôneia is not Socratic Irony”, in: D. Sedley (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 31, Oxford 2006, 49–83.Google Scholar

  • H. Lausberg, Handbook of Literary Rhetoric, transl. by M. T. Bliss/A. Jansen/D. E. Orton, Leiden/Boston/Köln 1998. Google Scholar

  • J. L. Moles, Plutarch: The Life of Cicero, Warminster 1988.Google Scholar

  • A. G. Nikolaidis, “Plutarch on the Fifth Century Sophists”, in: G. Pace/P. Volpe Cacciatore (eds.), Plutarch’s Writings: Transmission, Translation, Reception, Commentary, Napoli 2013, 309–325.Google Scholar

  • J. Opsomer, “εἰρωνεία in the Corpus Plutarcheum”, in: L. Van der Stockt (ed.), Rhetorical Theory and Praxis in Plutarch, Louvain-Namur 2000, 309–329.Google Scholar

  • A. Plebe, La teoria del comico da Aristotele a Plutarco, Torino 1952.Google Scholar

  • B. Puech, “Soclaros de Tithorée, ami de Plutarque, et ses descendants”, REG 94, 1981, 186–192.Google Scholar

  • B. Puech, “Prosopographie des amis de Plutarque”, ANRW 33.6, 1992, 4831–4893.Google Scholar

  • V. Ramón Palerm, “Recursos humorísticos en la obra de Plutarco”, in: A. G. Nikolaidis (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch’s Work, Berlin/New York 2008, 601–610.Google Scholar

  • A. Rapp, The Origins of Wit and Humor, New York 1951. Google Scholar

  • T. Reekmans, “Verbal Humour in Plutarch and Suetonius’ Lives”, AncSoc 23, 1992, 189–232.Google Scholar

  • T. Reekmans, “Non-Verbal Jesting in Plutarch’s Lives”, in: L. Van der Stockt (ed.), Plutarchea Lovaniensia: A Miscellany of Essays on Plutarch, Leuven 1996, 228–241. Google Scholar

  • O. Ribbeck, “Über den Begriff des εἴρων”, RhM 31, 1876, 381–400.Google Scholar

  • K. M. Sayre, Plato’s Literary Garden, Notre Dame, Ind. 1995.Google Scholar

  • G. R. Stanton, “Sophists and Philosophers: Problems of classification”, AJPh 94, 1973, 350–364.Google Scholar

  • R. Stark, “Sokratisches in den ‘Vögeln’ des Aristophanes”, RhM 96, 1953, 77–89.Google Scholar

  • E. Stein, “Soklaros”, RE 3.A, 1927, 801–802. Google Scholar

  • S.-T. Teodorsson, A Commentary on Plutarch’s Table Talks, 3 vols., Göteborg 1989/1990/1996.Google Scholar

  • R. G. Ussher, The Characters of Theophrastus, London 1960.Google Scholar

  • G. Vlastos, “Socratic Irony”, CQ 37, 1987, 79–96.Google Scholar

  • K. Ziegler, Plutarchos von Chaironeia, Stuttgart 1949 (= ‘Plutarchos’ in RE 21.1, 1951, 636–962).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-02-14

Published in Print: 2019-05-29

Citation Information: Philologus, Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages 110–128, ISSN (Online) 2196-7008, ISSN (Print) 0031-7985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2017-0029.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in