Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Founded in 1846!

Philologus

Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption / A Journal for Ancient Literature and its Reception

Ed. by Föllinger, Sabine / Fuhrer, Therese / Reinhardt, Tobias / Stenger, Jan / Vöhler, Martin


CiteScore 2018: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.867

Online
ISSN
2196-7008
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 163, Issue 1

Issues

The Stylistic Function of Neologisms in Cercidas

Duccio Guasti
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Cincinnati, Department of Classics, 410 Blegen Library, PO Box 210226, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0226, United States of America
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0010

Abstract

In this paper I analyze the rhetorical function of compositional neologisms in Cercidas’ versification, in order to provide a new semantical and/or syntactical explanation for single words that have not been correctly interpreted before. In particular I analyze the fragments 1.41–50 Lom., 2.25–7 Lom. and 60 Lom., focusing especially on the correct interpretation of τεθνακοχαλκίδης, συοπλουτοσύνη and μεταμελλοδύνη. At the end of the paper, final considerations on the rhetorical function of neologism in Cercidas’ text are offered.

Keywords: Cercidas; Greek morphology; Greek vocabulary; intertextuality; poetics

Bibliography

  • Ateneo di Naucrati, I Deipnosofisti, libro XV, traduz. e commento a cura di A. Rimedio, Roma 2001.Google Scholar

  • Athenaeus, The Deipnosophists, vol. VII, with an English trans. by C. B. Gulick, London/Cambridge, MA 1941.Google Scholar

  • Athenaeus, The Learned Banqueters, Book 15, ed. and transl. by S. D. Olson, London/Cambridge, MA 2012.Google Scholar

  • Cercidas, ed. Liana Lomiento, Roma 1993. Google Scholar

  • G. Fraccaroli, “Review of Hunt 1911”, RFIC 40.1, 1912, 124–129.Google Scholar

  • Herodes, Mimes and fragments. Cercidas, Meliambs, fragments, and Cercidea and the Greek Choliambic poets, ed. and trans. A. D. Knox, London/New York 1929.Google Scholar

  • Hipponax, Testimonia et fragmenta, ed. H. Degani, Stuttgart/Leipzig 21991.Google Scholar

  • P. Oxy. 1082. Cercidas’ Meliambi, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri 8, ed. by A. Hunt, London 1911, 20–59.Google Scholar

  • Plato, Alcibiades, ed. N. Denyer, Cambridge 2001.Google Scholar

  • R. Rosen, “Cercidas”, in: D. Sider (ed.), Hellenistic Poetry. A Selection, Ann Arbor 2017, 224–35.Google Scholar

  • Studi Cercidei. P. Oxy. 1082, ed. by E. Livrea, Bonn 1986.Google Scholar

  • E. A. Barber, “Cercidas”, in: E. A. Barber/J. U. Powell (eds.), New Chapters in the History of Greek Literature, vol. 1, Oxford 1921, 2–11.Google Scholar

  • L. Bettarini, “Alceo fr. 393 Voigt: il ‘maiale’ nei proverbi greci”, RCCM 39.1, 1997, 19–38.Google Scholar

  • P. Chantraine, La formation des noms en grec ancien, Paris 1933.Google Scholar

  • J. C. Daroca/J. L. L. Cruces, “Κοινοκρατηρόσκυφος. Comensalidad y política en la poesía cercidea”, Fortunatae 2, 1991, 23–36.Google Scholar

  • A. Debrunner, Griechische Wortbildungslehre, Heidelberg 1917.Google Scholar

  • M. Di Marco, “Riflessi della polemica antiepicurea nei ‘silli’ di Timone”, Elenchos 4.1, 1983, 59–91.Google Scholar

  • M. W. Edwards, The Iliad: A Commentary, vol. 5, Cambridge 1991.Google Scholar

  • G. A. Gerhard, Phoinix von Kolophon, Leipzig/Berlin 1909.Google Scholar

  • M. Gigante, “Cercida, Filodemo e Orazio”, RFIC 83, 1955, 286–293.Google Scholar

  • D. Guasti, “Pittaco ζοφοδορπίδαις e la storia dei sostantivi in -ίδης”, GLB 22.1, 2017, 57–67.Google Scholar

  • G. Hoffmann, Schimpfwörter der Griechen und Römer, Berlin 1892.Google Scholar

  • A. D. Knox, “The Kerkidas Papyrus”, CR 38, 1924, 101–104.Google Scholar

  • G. Meyer, Die stilistische Verwendung der Nominalkomposition im Griechischen, Leipzig 1923.Google Scholar

  • G. Pascucci, “Note stilistiche sull'uso del diminutivo greco”, SIFC 37, 1965, 189–240 (reprinted as a pamphlet, Firenze 1967).Google Scholar

  • K. F. W. Schmidt, “Review of Hunt 1911”, GGA 1912, 634–636.Google Scholar

  • E. Schwertheim, “Lampsakos”, DNP, vol. 6, Stuttgart/Weimar 1999, 1089 f.Google Scholar

  • J. T. Sheppard, The Pattern of the Iliad, London 1922.Google Scholar

  • O. Tribulato, Ancient Greek Verb-Initial Compounds, Berlin/New York 2015.Google Scholar

  • G. Vollgraff, “τεθνακοχαλκίδας”, Mnemosyne 51.2, 1923, 179.Google Scholar

  • U. v. Wilamowitz-Moellendorf, “Kerkidas”, Sitzungsber. der preuß. Akad. der Wiss. 1918, 1138–1164 (reprinted in U. v. Wilamowitz, Kleine Schriften, vol. 2, Berlin/New York 1941, 128–59, from which I cite).Google Scholar

  • A. Willi, “The Language of Old Comedy”, in: G. W. Dobrov (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Study of Greek Comedy, Leiden/Boston 2010, 471–510.Google Scholar

  • F. Williams, “Two notes on Cercidas of Megalopolis”, in: L. Gil (ed.), Apophoreta philologica Immanueli Fernandez Galiano a sodalibus oblata, Madrid 1984, 354–357.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-06-15

Published in Print: 2019-05-29


Citation Information: Philologus, Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages 95–109, ISSN (Online) 2196-7008, ISSN (Print) 0031-7985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0010.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in