Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Founded in 1846!

Philologus

Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption / A Journal for Ancient Literature and its Reception

Ed. by Föllinger, Sabine / Fuhrer, Therese / Reinhardt, Tobias / Stenger, Jan / Vöhler, Martin


CiteScore 2018: 0.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.100
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.867

Online
ISSN
2196-7008
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 163, Issue 1

Issues

Te veniente die, te decedente canebat: il τόπος del mattino e della sera tra neoterismo e poesia augustea

Paola Gagliardi
Published Online: 2019-03-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0033

Abstract

The reference to the rising and setting of the sun to indicate the unceasing duration of an action becomes a τόπος in Latin poetry from an influential distich of Cinna onwards, which was reworked a number of times in Augustan poetry. As well as Vergil and Horace, who adapt the model to different genres and occasions, the treatment of it by the elegists is interesting, in whom the two terms that define East and West are set in relation to the eternity of poetic renown. This transformation may go back to Gallus, to whom Ovid, above all, makes significant references. The numerous occurrences of the τόπος in different authors and genres make possible interesting comparisons.

Keywords.: Cinna; Orfeo; elegia; Cornelio Gallo

Bibliografia

  • A. S. Hollis, Fragments of Roman Poetry, c. 60 BC–AD 20, Oxford/New York 2007.Google Scholar

  • Ciris, A Poem Attributed to Vergil, ed. R. O. A. M. Lyne, Cambridge ²2004.Google Scholar

  • P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistularum ex Ponto liber II, a cura di Luigi Galasso, Firenze 1995. Google Scholar

  • Ovidio, Tristia. Introduzione di D. Giordano, traduzione di R. Mazzanti, note e commenti di M. Bonvicini, Milano 42013.Google Scholar

  • Properzio, Elegie. Libro II. Introduzione, testo e commento di Paolo Fedeli, Cambridge 2005. Google Scholar

  • Virgil, Georgics, volume 2, books III–IV, edited by R. F. Thomas, Cambridge 1988.Google Scholar

  • T. Baier, “Episches Erzählen in Vergils Georgica”, RhM 150, 2007, 314–336.Google Scholar

  • A. Barchiesi, recensione a G. D’Anna, Virgilio. Saggi critici, RFIC 118, 1990, 470–472.Google Scholar

  • H. Bardon, “L’aurore et le crépuscule”, REL 24, 1946, 82–115.Google Scholar

  • J. P. Boucher, Caius Cornélius Gallus, Paris 1966.Google Scholar

  • G. Brugnoli, “Corneli Galli Fragm.”, MCr 18, 1983, 233–236.Google Scholar

  • F. Cairns, Sextus Propertius. The Augustan Elegist, Cambridge 2006.Google Scholar

  • W. V. Clausen, “Callimachus and Latin Poetry”, GRBS 5, 1964, 181–196.Google Scholar

  • N. B. Crowther, “Parthenius and Roman Poetry”, Mnemosyne 29, 1976, 65–71.Google Scholar

  • N. B. Crowther, “Cornelius Gallus, His Importance in the Development of Roman Poetry”, ANRW II 30, 3, 1983, 1622–1648.Google Scholar

  • H. Dahlmann, “Über Helvius Cinna”, AAM 8, 1977, 1–50. Google Scholar

  • G. D’Anna, Virgilio. Saggi critici, Roma 1989.Google Scholar

  • P. Domenicucci, “L’elegia di Orfeo nel IV libro delle Georgiche”, GIF 16, 1985, 239–248.Google Scholar

  • I. M. L. M. Du Quesnay, “From Polyphemus to Corydon: Virgil, Eclogue 2 and the Idylls of Theocritus”, in: D. West/T. Woodman (edd.), Creative imitation and Latin literature, Cambridge 1979, 35–70.Google Scholar

  • I. Fielding, Transformations of Ovid in Late Antiquity, Cambridge 2017.Google Scholar

  • C. Francese, Parthenius of Nicaea and Roman Poetry, Frankfurt a. M. 2001.Google Scholar

  • P. Gagliardi, “Il processo di Gallo tra antichi e moderni”, RhM 154, 2011, 343–374.Google Scholar

  • P. Gagliardi, Commento alla decima ecloga di Virgilio (Spudasmata 161), Hildesheim/Zürich/New York 2014. (= 2014a)Google Scholar

  • P. Gagliardi, “Le Muse Pieridi in Virgilio e in Properzio (e forse in Gallo)”, Hermes 142, 2014, 102–128. (= 2014b)Google Scholar

  • P. Gagliardi, “Il caso di Cornelio Gallo: una sfida per la propaganda augustea”, Klio 97, 2015, 625–647.Google Scholar

  • J. Griffin, “The Fourth Georgic, Virgil and Rome”, G&R 26, 1979, 61–80.Google Scholar

  • H. Jacobson, “Aristaeus, Orpheus and the laudes Galli”, AJPh 105, 1984, 271–300.Google Scholar

  • J. L. Lightfoot, Parthenius of Nicaea, Oxford 1999.Google Scholar

  • G. E. Manzoni, Foroiuliensis poeta. Vita e poesia di Cornelio Gallo, Milano 1995.Google Scholar

  • J. C. McKeown, Ovid, Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary in four volumes. Volume II, A Commentary on Book One, Leeds 1989. Google Scholar

  • A. M. Morelli, “Rassegna sul nuovo Gallo”, in: V. Tandoi (ed.), Disiecti membra poetae. Studi di poesia latina in frammenti, vol. II, Foggia 1985, 140–183. Google Scholar

  • R. G. M. Nisbet/M. Hubbard, A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book II, Oxford 22004.Google Scholar

  • L. Nicastri, Cornelio Gallo e l’elegia ellenistico-romana, Napoli 1984.Google Scholar

  • L. Nosarti, Studi sulle Georgiche di Virgilio, Padova 1996.Google Scholar

  • B. Otis, Virgil. A Study in Civilized Poetry, Oxford 1964.Google Scholar

  • E. Paratore, “L’episodio di Orfeo”, in: Atti del convegno virgiliano sul bimillenario delle Georgiche, Napoli 1977, 9–18.Google Scholar

  • F. Rohr Vio, “Non fuit obprobrio celebrasse Lycorida Gallo”, Sileno 20, 1994, 305–316.Google Scholar

  • F. Rohr Vio, Le voci del dissenso, Padova 2000.Google Scholar

  • D. O. Ross, Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome, Cambridge 1975. Google Scholar

  • A. Salvatore, “Lettura del quarto libro delle Georgiche”, in: M. Gigante (ed.), Lecturae Vergilianae, vol. II, Napoli 1982, 123–157.Google Scholar

  • A. Schott, Observationes humanae, Frankfurt a. M., II, 1615.Google Scholar

  • G. Schultze, Euphorionea, Diss. Argentorati, 1888. Google Scholar

  • A. Setaioli, Si tantus amor..., Bologna 1998.Google Scholar

  • T. Stickler, Gallus amore peribat? Cornelius Gallus und die Anfänge der augusteischen Herrschaft in Ägypten, Rahden/Westf. 2002.Google Scholar

  • W. Stroh, Die römische Liebeselegie als Werbende Dichtung, Amsterdam 1971.Google Scholar

  • W. Stroh, “Tröstende Musen. Zur literarhistorischen Stellung und Bedeutung von Ovids Exilgedichten”, ANRW II 31, 4, Berlin/New York 1981, 2638–2684.Google Scholar

  • R. Syme, History in Ovid, Oxford 1978.Google Scholar

  • A. Traina, Poeti latini (e neolatini), note e saggi filologici 5, Bologna 1998.Google Scholar

  • J. Wills, Repetition in Latin poetry. Figures of Allusion, Oxford 1996. Google Scholar

  • T. P. Wiseman, Cinna the Poet and Other Roman Essays, Leicester 1974.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-03-28

Published in Print: 2019-05-29


Citation Information: Philologus, Volume 163, Issue 1, Pages 129–144, ISSN (Online) 2196-7008, ISSN (Print) 0031-7985, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-2018-0033.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in