Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Physics

formerly Central European Journal of Physics

Editor-in-Chief: Feng, Jonathan

Managing Editor: Lesna-Szreter, Paulina

1 Issue per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Open Physics): 0.745
IMPACT FACTOR 2016 (Central European Journal of Physics): 0.765

CiteScore 2016: 0.82

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.458
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.142

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-5471
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 7, Issue 1 (Mar 2009)

Issues

Atom as a “dressed” nucleus

Vladimir Kalitvianski
Published Online: 2009-01-08 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-008-0148-4

Abstract

We show that the electrostatic potential of an atomic nucleus “seen” by a fast charged projectile at short distances is quantum mechanically smeared due to nucleus motion around the atomic center of inertia. For example, the size of the “positive charge cloud” in the Hydrogen ground state is much larger than the proper proton size. For target atoms in excited initial states, the effect is even larger. The elastic scattering at large angles is generally weaker than the Rutherford scattering since the effective potential at short distances is softer than the Colombian one due to a natural “cutoff”. In addition, the large-angle scattering leads to target atom excitations due to pushing the nucleus (⇒ inelastic processes). The Rutherford cross section is in fact inclusive rather than elastic. These results are analogous to those from QED. Non-relativistic atomic calculations are presented. The difference and the value of these calculations arise from nonperturbatively (exact) nucleus “dressing” that immediately leads to correct physical results and to significant technical simplifications. In these respects a nucleus bound in an atom is a simple but rather realistic model of a “dressed” charge in the QFT. This idea is briefly demonstrated on a real electron model (electronium) which is free from infinities.

Keywords: quantum mechanical charge smearing; natural cutoff of potential; interaction instead of self-action; nonperturbatively particle dressing; model of real electron

PACS: 13.40.Gp; 14.60.Cd; 14.70.Bh; 11.10.Ef

  • [1] L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshits, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon press, Oxford, 1976) Google Scholar

  • [2] V.L. Kalitvianski, Ukrainian Journal of Physics (in Russian) 38, 851 (1993) Google Scholar

  • [3] F. Bloch, A. Nordsieck, Phys. Rev. 52, 54 (1937) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.52.54CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] A.I. Akhiezer, V.B. Berestetskii, Quantum electrodynamics (Interscience publishers, New York, 1965) Google Scholar

  • [5] W. Pauli, M. Fierz, Nuovo Cimento, 15, 167 (1937) Google Scholar

  • [6] T.A. Welton, Phys. Rev. 74, 1157 (1948) http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.74.1157CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2009-01-08

Published in Print: 2009-03-01


Citation Information: Open Physics, ISSN (Online) 2391-5471, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-008-0148-4.

Export Citation

© 2009 Versita Warsaw. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in