The idea of synchronizing two identical chaotic systems that start from different initial conditions was introduced by Pecora and Carroll . Using a transmitted signal, they showed that synchronization occurs when the Lyapunov exponents for the response subsystem are all negative. Since that pioneering paper, the issue of chaos synchronization has attracted great interest in nonlinear science and engineering [2,3,4,5, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. At the beginning, by modifying the Pecora-Carroll scheme, most of the methods have focused on complete (identical) synchronization [3,4. Subsequently, different types of synchronization have been proposed in the literature, for both continuous-time systems and discrete-time systems [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Among these, projective synchronization provides response system variables that are scaled replicas of the drive system variables [6, 18,19,20,21].
A variation of projective synchronization is the so-called full state hybrid projective synchronization [22,23,24,25]. In this type of synchronization the scaling factor can be different for each state variable, meaning that the single scaling parameter (originally introduced in Ref. ) is replaced by a diagonal scaling matrix. On the other hand, when the scaling matrix is a full matrix, the so-called matrix projective synchronization is achieved [26,27,28,29].
Another interesting approach is represented by generalized synchronization, where the drive system and the response system are non-identical dynamical systems [30,31,32]. This type of synchronization is characterized by the existence of a functional relationship F between the state of the drive system and the state y of the response system, so that y=F(x) after a transient time. A variation is represented by the inverse generalized synchronization, where the synchronization condition becomes x = F(x) after a transient time .
By exploiting previous considerations and by taking into account the concepts of inverse generalized synchronization and matrix synchronization, a new type of synchronization for chaotic maps with different dimensions is proposed in this paper. Specifically, given n-dimensional drive system map and m-dimensional response system map, the novel scheme is called F – M synchronization with index d since it combines the inverse generalized synchronization (based on a functional relationship F), with the matrix projective synchronization (based on a matrix M). Note that the synchronization index d corresponds to the dimension of the synchronization error. The technique, which exploits nonlinear controllers and Lyapunov stability theory, proves to be effective in achieving the F – M synchronization not only when the synchronization index d equals n or m, but even if the synchronization index d is larger than the map dimensions n and m.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the F – M synchronization with index d is defined. In Section 3, three different theorems are provided, which cover three different F – M synchronization cases, with indices d = m, d = n and d larger than m and n, respectively. Finally, in order to show the capabilities of the conceived synchronization schemes, Section 4 illustrates the F – M synchronization between the two-dimensional Fold map and the three-dimensional generalized Hénon map, when the synchronization indices are d = 3, d = 2 and d = 4, indicating that the method is effective in achieving synchronization even if the synchronization index d is larger than the map dimensions n and m.
2 F – M synchronization with index d
The drive and the response chaotic systems considered herein are in the following forms
where X(k) ∈ ℝn and Y(k) ∈ ℝm are state vectors of the drive and slave systems, respectively, A ∈ ℝn×n and B ∈ ℝm×m are the linear parts of the drive system and response system, respectively, f : ℝn → ℝn and g : ℝm → ℝm are the nonlinear parts of the drive system and response system, respectively, and U ∈ ℝm is a vector controller.
Before introducing the new concept of F – M synchronization for the drive system (1) and the response system (2), the definitions of matrix projective synchronization (MPS) and inverse generalized synchronization (IGS) are provided.
Matrix projective synchronization is said to be achieved between the n-dimensional drive system X(k) and m-dimensional response system Y(k) if there exists a controller U = (ui)1≤i≤m and an m × n matrix M such that the synchronization error
satisfies the condition limk→∞ ║e(k)║ = 0.
Inverse generalized synchronization is said to be achieved between the n-dimensional drive system X(k) and m-dimensional response system Y(k) if there exists a controller U = (ui)1≤i≤m and a map F : ℝm → ℝn such that the synchronization error
satisfies the condition limk→∞ ║e(k)║ = 0.
Next, we introduce a new type of synchronization.
The n-dimensional drive system (1) and m-dimensional response system (2) with state vectors X(k) and Y(k), respectively, achieve F – M synchronization if there exists a controller U = (ui)1≤i≤m, a map F : ℝm → ℝd and a d × n matrix M such that the synchronization error
satisfies the condition limk→∞ ║e(k)║ = 0. The constant d is called the synchronization index and represents the dimension of the F – M synchronization.
3 F – M synchronization criterions
In this section, different cases of synchronization are analyzed. The first case is when the synchronization index d equals m, i.e., the dimension of the response system. The second case is when the synchronization index d equals n, i.e., the dimension of the drive system. Finally, the case when the synchronization index d is larger than both m and n is analyzed in details.
3.1 Case: d = m
where F–1 is the inverse function of F and
provided that L1 ∈ ℝm×m is chosen such that the eigenvalues of the matrix (B – L1) are placed strictly inside the unit disk.
If the eigenvalues of the matrix (B – L1) are placed strictly inside the unit disk, then, from the asymptotic stability theory of linear discrete-time systems, it follows that all the solutions of the error system (9) go to zero as k → ∞. Therefore, the systems (1) and (2) are globally F – M synchronized with index m.□
3.2 Case: d = n
In this case, the synchronization index d is taken as the dimension of the drive system n.
where F–1 : ℝn → ℝm is the inverse function of F : ℝm → ℝn and
provided that ((A–L2)T(A–L2) – I) is a negative definite matrix and L2 and M two matrices of dimension (n × n).
By constructing the candidate Lyapunov function in the form V(e(k)) = eT(k)e(k), it follows that
Since by assumption, ((A–L2)T(A–L2) – I) is a negative definite matrix, it follows that ΔV(e(k)) < 0. Thus, from the Lyapunov stability theory, the zero solution of the error system (13) is globally asymptotically stable, i.e., limk→∞ ║e(k)║ = 0. Consequently, systems (1) and (2) are globally F – M synchronized with index n.□
3.3 Case: d ≠ n, m
In this case, the synchronization index d is taken as the dimension of the drive system n.
where R3 is given by
with L3 = diag(l1, l2,…, ld), F : ℝm→ℝd, F–1 : ℝd → ℝm and M ∈ ℝd×n, provided that all the elements li satisfy the condition
We consider the quadratic Lyapunov function
It follows that
By condition (16), ΔV(e(k)) < 0. Thus, from the Lyapunov stability theory, it follows that limk→∞ ei(k) = 0 for i= 1, 2, …, d and hence, systems (1) and (2) are globally F–M synchronized with dimension d ≠ n,m.□
4 Synchronization examples using the 2-D Fold map and the 3-D generalized Hénon map
In this section, we validate the theoretical results illustrated above. The Fold map is considered as the drive system and the controlled three-dimensional generalized Hénon map is taken as the response system. The Fold map can be described as follows:
Note that the linear part and nonlinear part of the map (19) are given by
The controlled three-dimensional generalized Hénon map can be described as
where U = [u1, u2, u3]T is the vector controller. The 3D generalized Hénon map, i.e., system (20) with U = [0, 0, 0]T, is chaotic when α = 1.07 and β = 0.3  as shown in Figure 1 (b). Similarly, the linear part and nonlinear part of system (20) are given by
4.1 F – M synchronization with index d = 3
In this case, the map F and the scaling matrix M are selected as follows:
Then, the error system is defined as
yields error system
with eigenvalues placed strictly inside the unit disk. As a consequence, F – M synchronization with index d = 3 is achieved between the Fold map and the 3D generalized Hénon map as shown in Figure 2.
4.2 F – M synchronization with index d = 2
In this case, the map F and the scaling matrix M are chosen as follows
By considering (5), the error system is written as
it can be readily shown that the matrix ((A–L2)T(A–L2)–I) is a negative definite matrix. As a result, the zero solution of the error system
is globally asymptotically stable. According to Theorem 2, this means that the Fold map and the 3D generalized Hénon system are F – M synchronized with index d = 2. Simulation results are shown in Figure 3.
4.3 F – M synchronization with index d = 4
According to the definition 2.3, it is clear that the dimension d of the F – M synchronization can be larger than the dimensions of both the drive system map and the response system map. In order to show this nice property, which represents a new result in the field of chaos synchronization, the value d = 4 is now chosen, i.e., a value larger than the dimensions of both the Fold map and the 3D generalized Hénon map. In particular, the F – M synchronization error is now defined as:
where all the four diagonal control parameters satisfy the condition (16), the following error system is obtained:
According to Theorem 3.3, since the zero solution of system (35) is globally asymptotically stable, i.e., the Fold system and the 3D generalized Hénon map are F – M synchronized with index d = 4. The results of the numerical simulations are plotted in Figure 4.
This section will carry out some comparisons between the proposed method and similar papers published in the literature, with the aim to highlight the differences between the available approaches. In particular, attention is focused on two interesting synchronization methods based on fuzzy rules [35,36]. For example, in  the author illustrates a H∞ synchronization method based on the T–S fuzzy model and the delayed feedback control. In particular, in  the closed loop error system is asymptotically synchronized using an existence criterion for the controller. The approach is mainly based on the Lyapunov–Krasovskii method and on the linear matrix inequality (LMI). A similarity between the approach in  and the proposed one lies in the adoption of Lyapunov-based methods in order to guarantee the stability of the error system. However, a remarkable difference between the two methods is that the one in  has been designed for continuous-time systems, while the proposed one holds for discrete-time systems. Referring to , the author proposes a receding horizon control technique for achieving H∞ synchronization in chaotic systems with external disturbance. The approach, which is based on a new set of matrix inequality conditions, is applied to synchronize the chaotic Lorenz system. Even though the method in  is very interesting, it has been developed for continuous-time systems, while the proposed approach has been conceived for discrete-time systems. By summarizing, we believe that the approaches in [35,36] can be considered interesting tools for synchronizing continuous-time chaotic systems, while the proposed method is valuable for synchronizing discrete-time chaotic systems with multiple choices of synchronization indices d (i.e., not only when the synchronization index d equals n or m, but even if the synchronization index d is larger than the map dimensions n and m).
Finally, we would make some comments on future developments of the present work. In particular, we are conscious that circuit implementations of synchronization schemes are an important issue. For this reason, we are currently working on the hardware implementation of the F-M synchronization method, starting from the Grassi – Miller map . Namely, we would remark that a co-author (Grassi) has already implemented that map in , so we are preparing a forthcoming paper where all the details related to the circuit implementation of the conceived synchronization scheme will be provided.
In this paper, a new type of chaos synchronization, called F – M synchronization with index d, has been proposed. The novelty relies on the fact that the approach combines two different synchronization types, the inverse generalized synchronization (based on a functional relationship F) and the matrix projective synchronization (based on a matrix M). The technique exploits nonlinear controllers and Lyapunov stability theory in order to synchronize n-dimensional drive system maps and m-dimensional response system maps. The approach has proved to be effective in achieving synchronized dynamics not only when the synchronization index d equals n or m, but even if the synchronization index d is larger than the map dimensions n and m which is an interesting result. Finally, simulation results involving the Fold map and the 3D generalized Hénon map are provided, with the aim to highlight the capabilities of the presented new scheme. As a concluding remark, we would like to highlight that the basic idea of the present paper, the combination of two different synchronization types in order to create a novel synchronization scheme, can be further generalized. This can be achieved by considering two different synchronization types as “building blocks” to obtain several new synchronization schemes using the technique developed in this paper. Consequently, the approach illustrated here can be considered as a “methodology” to create new synchronization schemes starting from two well-established synchronization types.
The authors acknowledge Prof. Guan-Rong Chen, Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong for suggesting many helpful references. The author Xiong Wang was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61601306) and Shenzhen Overseas High Level Talent Peacock Project Fund (No. 20150215145C).
Brucoli M., Cafagna D., Carnimeo L., Grassi G., Synchronization of hyperchaotic circuits via continuous feedback control with application to secure communications, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 1998, 8(10), 2031–2040 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cafagna D., Grassi G., Observer-based projective synchronization of fractional systems via a scalar signal: application to hyperchaotic Rössler systems, Nonlinear Dyn., 2012, 68(1), 117–128 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouannas A., Grassi G., A new approach to study the coexistence of some synchronization types between chaotic maps with different dimensions, Nonlin. Dyn., 2016, 86(2), 1319–1328 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouannas A., Azar A.T., Ziar T., On inverse full state hybrid function projective synchronization for continuous–time chaotic dynamical systems with arbitrary dimensions, Diff. Eq. Dyn. Syst., 2017, 1–14 Google Scholar
Ouannas A., Azar A.T., Vaidyanathan S., New hybrid synchronisation schemes based on coexistence of various types of synchronisation between master-slave hyperchaotic systems, Int.J. Comput. App. Tech., 2017, 55(2), 112–120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouannas A., Al-Sawalha M.M. A new approach to synchronize different dimensional chaotic maps using two scaling matrices, Nonlin. Dyn. Syst. Theory, 2015 15 400–408 Google Scholar
Ouannas A., Co-existence of various types of synchronization between hyperchaotic maps, Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory, 2016, 16, 312–321 Google Scholar
Ouannas A., Odibat Z., Shawagfeh N., A new q–s synchronization results for discrete chaotic systems, Diff. Eq. Dyn. Syst., 2016, 1–10. Google Scholar
Ouannas A., Odibat Z., Shawagfeh N., Alsaedi A., Ahmad B., Universal chaos synchronization control laws for general quadratic discrete systems, Appl. Math. Mod., 2017, 45, 636–641 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouannas A., Azar A.T., Abu-Saris R., A new type of hybrid synchronization between arbitrary hyperchaotic maps, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyb., 2016, 1–8 Google Scholar
Grassi G., Miller D.A., Arbitrary observer scaling of all chaotic drive system states via a scalar synchronizing signal, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2009, 39(3), 1246–1252 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grassi G., Miller D.A., Projective synchronization via a linear observer: application to time-delay, continuous-time and discretetime systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 2007, 17(04), 1337–1342 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu M., Xu Z., Zhang R., Hu A., Parameters identification and adaptive full state hybrid projective synchronization of chaotic (hyper-chaotic) systems, Phys. Lett. A, 2007, 361(3), 231–237 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Hu M., Xu Z., Zhang R., Full state hybrid projective synchronization in continuous-time chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 2008, 13(2), 456–464 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Grassi G., Miller D.A., Dead-beat full state hybrid projective synchronization for chaotic maps using a scalar synchronizing signal, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 2012, 17(4), 1824–1830 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Hao D., Li-Xin J., Yan-Bin Z., Adaptive generalized matrix projective lag synchronization between two different complex networks with non-identical nodes and different dimensions, Chin. Phys. B, 2012, 21(12), 120508 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Wu Z., Xu X., Chen G., Fu X., Generalized matrix projective synchronization of general colored networks with differentdimensional node dynamics, J. Franklin Inst., 2014, 351(9), 4584–4595 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouannas A., Mahmoud E.E., Inverse matrix projective synchronization for discrete chaotic systems with different dimensions, J Comput. Intell. Electron. Syst., 2014, 3(3), 188–192 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ouannas A., Abu-Saris R., On matrix projective synchronization and inverse matrix projective synchronization for different and identical dimensional discrete-time chaotic systems, J. Chaos 2016, 2016, 4912520 Google Scholar
Mossa Al-Sawalha M., Al-Sawalha A., Anti-synchronization of fractional order chaotic and hyperchaotic systems with fully unknown parameters using modified adaptive control, OpenPhys., 2016, 14, 304–313 Google Scholar
Kocamaz U.E., Cevher B., Uyaroğlu Y., Control and synchronization of chaos with sliding mode control based on cubic reaching rule, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2017, 105, 92–98 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duan J.-S., Cheng C.-P., Chen L., A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives, Open Phys., 2017, 15, 809–818 CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Egunjobi A.I., Olusola O.I., Njah A.N., Saha S., Dana S.K., Experimental evidence of chaos synchronization via cyclic coupling, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 2018, 56, 588-595 Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-04-18
Citation Information: Open Physics, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 174–182, ISSN (Online) 2391-5471, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2018-0025.
© 2018 A. Ouannas et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0