It is well known that nonlinear phenomena occur in various areas of science and engineering, such as fluid mechanics, plasma, solid-state physics, biophysics, optical fibers, technology of space, control engineering problems, hydrodynamics etc. They could be modeled through nonlinear partial differential equations (NPDEs). Thus to search for various solutions of the NPDEs does become one of the most exciting and extremely active areas of investigation of these complex physical phenomena. During the recent years, a lot of powerful methods such as the inverse scattering method [1, 2], the Hirota bilinear transformation , the generalized Riccati equation method , the -expansion method [12, 13], the Lie symmetry method [7, 8, 9, 10, 11], the soliton ansatz method [12, 13], the generalized conditional symmetry approach [14, 15] and other techniques were established in order to obtain exact travelling wave solutions of nonlinear physical problems [16, 17, 18, 19].
A general theory able to explain the interactions between short and long waves has been developed (see Ref. ). It is known that the long wave-short wave resonance is a special case of the three wave resonances which does appear when the phase velocity of a long wave does match with the group velocity of a short wave and it could also appear when the second order nonlinearity would occur in the process. The physical importance of the so called (LS) type equations  consists in the fact that the dispersion of the shortwave is balanced by the nonlinear interaction between the long wave and the short wave, while the evolution of the long wave is driven by the self-interaction of the short wave. The (LS) wave resonance model is described by the following equations:
where L represents the amplitude of the long wave and it is a real function, S is the envelope of the short wave and it is a complex function, while α and β are real constants. Some works such as [22, 23], have been published about the qualitative research of global solutions for the long–short wave resonance equations. In  Lax’s formulation for Eqs. (1) have been provided and Cauchy problem has been solved through the inverse scattering method. The orbital stability of the solitary waves associated to (LS) type equations has been proven in [25, 26]. The first integral method  has been recently applied  to the governing system. The obtained solutions have been expressed in terms of trigonometric, hyperbolic and exponential functions. Multiple exact travelling wave solutions have been also derived in  by making use of the extended hyperbolic functions method for nonlinearwave equations. This approach is explicitly related to the solutions of the projective Riccati equations. Another perspective is offered in , where the solutions of the (LS) system are assumed as polynomial expansions in two variables which do satisfy to the projective Riccati equations yet their explicit solutions are not sought for.
However, in our contribution, we will classify the types of solutions related to Eq. (1) according to the values of some parameters through two distinct approaches. In Sections 2 and 3 we will provide the fundamental usefulness of the extended trial function method  and respectively of the generalized Kudryashov method . We will study in Section 4 how some types of travelling wave solutions are successfully pointed out by making use of the concerned methods. We will outline some solutions such as (a) the solitary wave solution of bell-type, (b) the solitary wave solution of kink-type for S and bell-type for L, (c) the compound solitary wave solution of the bell-type and the kink-type for S and L, (d) the singular travelling wave solutions and (e) the solitary wave solution of Jacobi elliptic function type. Some of them are more general than the ones derived through other algorithms. Section 5 is dedicated to some conclusions and final remarks.
2 Basics on the extended trial equation method
In this section we will describe the extended trial equation method for finding the travelling wave solutions of NPDEs. The main steps of the method are the the following:
- Step 1
For a given NPDE:
the wave transformation is applied:
- Step 2
Suppose that the solution of Eq. (4) can be expressed as follows:
where Γ(η) satisfies the trial equation:
Here Φ(Γ) and Ψ(Γ) are polynomials.
The coefficients ai, i = 0,δ, ξk, k = 0,p, νr, r = 0,n are constants to be determined later. A relationship between p, n, δ could be defined by taking into consideration the homogeneous balance between the highest order derivatives and the nonlinear terms that do appear in the ODE (4).
- Step 3
Equating the coefficients of each power Γj, j = 0,s to zero we generate a set of algebraic equations for ai, ξk and νr.
- Step 4
Simplify Eq. (6) to the elementary integral shape:
By making use of a complete discrimination system  for polynomials in order to classify the roots of Φ(Γ), we can solve (8) and we can as well derive the travelling wave solutions of underlying Eq. (2).
3 Basics on the generalized Kudryashov method
In this section we will describe a generalized version of the Kudryashov method for finding solitary wave solutions of NPDEs. When taking into consideration the NPDE:
the main steps of the method can be summarized as follows:
- Step 1
We are looking for travelling wave solutions of (9) under the form:
- Step 2
We assume that the exact solutions of Eq.(11) can be expressed as follows:
where ai, i =0,N, bj, j =0,M are arbitrary constants and Q(ρ) is the solution of Kudryashov equation :
The relationship between the integers M and N can be found by taking into consideration the homogeneous balance between the highest order derivatives and the nonlinear terms which appear in the travelling wave Eq. (11).
- Step 3
For each couple of values respectively taken by M and N, by substituting Eqs. (12) and (13) into Eq. (11) yields to a polynomial R(Q). By setting all the coefficients of R(Q) to zero, the parameters ai, bi,μk,ρk can be explicitly determined by solving the equations of their algebraic relations.
4 Travelling wave solutions related to (LS)-type equations
In this section, we will apply the methods which we have summarized in the previous section in order to construct the travelling wave solutions for the system (1). Let us present in the next two subsections some preliminary results.
4.1 Relationship between the real functions in the case of (LS)-type equations
Suppose that the governing system (1) admits travelling wave solutions under the form:
where μ = μ1 x + μ2 t, ρ = ρ1 x + ρ2 t are wave variables and S(ρ), L(ρ) are real-valued functions.
where the prime does indicate the derivative with respect to ρ.
From the first equation of (15) we derive the parameter relation:
where the integration constant is chosen to be zero.
The previous result together with the second equation from system (15) generate the Liénard ODE:
where we use the denotations:
Consequently the search for travelling wave solutions in the case of (LS)-type equations is reduced to a discussion about travelling wave solutions related to the ODE (18). This discussion will be the object of the next subsection.
4.2 Travelling wave solutions of (1) via the extended trial equation method
In order to obtain the travelling wave solutions for (1) let us choose n = 0, δ = 1 and p = 4. This choice corresponds to solutions under the form:
where the constants a0 and a1 do satisfy to and have to be determined later. Relying upon the above description of the method, we can obtain:
By substituting (21) and (22) into (18), the left-hand side of the underlying ODE becomes a third order polynomial in Γ. Setting the coefficients of power Γm,m = 0,3 to zero yields an algebraic system for parameters ai, i = 0, 1ξk, k =0,4, μj, j = 1, 2, ρ1, ν0. The solution given by the Maple program is:
In the above mentioned particular case, the integral (8) becomes:
where with μ1 < 0.
If we denote by αn, n = 1,4 the roots of the polynomial involved in (25), we reach five distinct cases which allow us to find the unknown Γ function. They are:
When α1 is a one and only multiple root of the polynom, we get
When the polynom admits two distinct roots αn, n = 1, 2, we obtain:
When the polynom admits three distinct roots with α1 > α2 > α3, we have:
When all the roots of the polynomial are distinct with α1 > α2 > α3 > α4, the result is:
solitary wave solutions of bell-type given by
where K1 = a1K.
singular wave solutions
or bright soliton solutions
where Here K2 is the amplitude of the soliton, and R is the inverse width of the soliton. Thus, we can assert that solitons exist for a1 < 0. In our situation P cannot be zero, because R does not admit real values. However, the solutions S(ρ) proportional with sech function could be derived in  through another technique, namely an improved -expansion method.
Jacobi elliptic function type solutions:
where K3 = 2a1(α1-α3)(α4–α2),M = α4–α2, N = α1–α4,
For Jacobi elliptic wave solution S5(t,x) with appropriate parametric choices, the surface plot of imaginary values is represented in Figure 1. The real values of S5 do present a similar graph except for a phase difference.
When the modulus l → 1, the solution (35) can be converted into the hyperbolic function solution of kink type for the (LS)-system:
where α3 = α4.
By taking the modulus l → 0 into (35) it yields to the periodic wave solutions of the (LS)-system:
where α2 = α3.
4.3 Travelling wave solutions of (1) via the generalized Kudryashov method
If we choose N = 2, M = 1, the solution of (18) will be sought under the form:
where ai, i = 0, 2, bj, j = 0, 1 are constants to be determined later and Q(ρ)= are the solutions of the auxiliary Eq. (13).
When substituting (39) together with (13) into the (18) and gathering all the terms with the same power of Q, the left-hand side of (18) is converted into a polynomial with Qr, r = 0, 6. When equating each coefficient of this polynomial to zero, a set of 7 algebraic equations for ai, i = 0,2, bi, j = 0, 1, μ1, μ2, ρ1 is derived. By solving this algebraic system with the help of Maple program, we get solitary wave solutions for (LS)-system as follows:
The solitary waves solution of kink-type:
generated through the choice of Q(ρ)= and through taking under consideration the parameters:
Dark soliton solution of kink-type for S and bell-type for L expressed under the form:
derived by assuming that Q(ρ)= as well as the relationships among parameters:
The dynamics of dark soliton solution (42) of kink-type for S9 and of bell-type for L9 with suitable parametric choices is shown in Figure 2. The imaginary values of S9 present a similar graph except for a phase difference.
By choosing Q(ρ)= singular travelling wave solutions expressed in terms of coth function can be found.
Compound wave solution of the bell-type and the kink-type for S and L with the explicit expressions:
which are related to Q(ρ)= and to the parameter relationships:
5 Concluding remarks
In this paper we have discussed about the possibilities offered by the extended trial equation method and by the generalized Kudryashov method in order to find new wave solutions for the long–short (LS) wave resonance Eq. (1). At least for the considered cases (21) respectively (39), these two methods lead us to complementary classes of solutions.
The key idea of the trial equation method is to reduce an ODE into a solvable integral Eq. (8) which involves polynomial functions. For the (LS)-type equations we have chosen to take advantage of the solutions to the trial function (forth degree polynomial) by making use of a mathematical tool denominated as the complete discrimination system. We have pointed out solutions such as: solitary wave solution of the bell-type, bright soliton solution, Jacobi elliptic function type solution, singular wave solution, periodic function type solution. To our knowledge, such classification involving the complete discrimination system for polynomials has not been reported. According to the specific parameters, some wave solutions (32), (34)-(37) do extend the ones obtained by the means of other techniques [27, 35, 36].
The generalized Kudryashov method is useful in order to reach the analytical solutions for the (LS) wave resonance model. We have been able to derive wave solution of kink-type (40), dark soliton solution of the kink-type for S and the bell-type for L (42) as well as a compound wave solution of the bell-type and the kink-type for S and L (44).
When we have taken into consideration some other values of parameters which should verify (20) and respectively (38), some new solitary wave solutions could be identified. The proposed methods have their own advantages. They offer both a concise and an efficient way for solving NPDEs, in two or more dimensions. Other methods, such as multi-symplectic method [37, 38], or generalized multi-symplectic method [39, 40] will be employed in future works.
The authors are grateful for the financial support offered by the project “Computational Methods in Astrophysics and Space Sciences”, no. 181/20.07.2017, of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, Program for Research –Space Technology and Advanced Research.
Ablowitz M.J., Clarkson P.A., Solitons, 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Vakhnenko V.O., Parkes E.J., Morrison A.J., A Bäcklund transformation and the inverse scattering transform method for the generalised Vakhnenko equation, Chaos Soliton Fract., 2003, 17, 683–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirota R., Backlund Transformations, Springer, Berlin, 1980 Google Scholar
Bian C., Pang J., Jin L., Ying X., Solving two fifth order strong nonlinear evolution equations by using the G′/G-expansion method, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 2010, 15, 2337–2343.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Olver P.J., Applications of Symmetry Methods to Partial Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New-York, 1986 Google Scholar
Cimpoiasu R., Constantinescu R., Cimpoiasu V.M., Integrability of dynamical systems with polynomial Hamiltonians, Rom. J. Phys., 2005, 50(3-4), 317–324. Google Scholar
Xu M.J., Tian S.F., Tu J.M., Zhang T.T., Lie symmetry analysis, conservation laws, solitary and periodic waves for a coupled Burger equation, Superlattice Microst., 2017, 101, 415-428. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tu J.M., Tian S.F., Xu M.J., Zhang T.T., On Lie symmetries, optimal systems and explicit solutions to the Kudryashov–Sinelshchikov equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 2016, 275, 345-352. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Bhrawy A.H., Abdelkawy M.A., Kumar S., Biswas A., Solitons and other solutions to Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation of B-type, Rom. J. Phys., 2013, 58, 729–748. Google Scholar
Su K., Cao J., Third-Order Conditional Lie–Bäcklund Symmetries of Nonlinear Reaction-Diffusion, Adv. Math. Phys., 2017, 2017, 2825416-1–2825416-9. Google Scholar
Tian S.F., Zhang H.Q., On the Integrability of a Generalized Variable-Coefficient Forced Korteweg-de Vries Equation in Fluids, Stud. Appl. Math., 2014, 132(3), 212-246. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang X.B., Tian S.F., Qin C.Y., Zhang T.T., Characteristics of the breathers, rogue waves and solitary waves in a generalized (2+1)-dimensional Boussinesq equation, Europhys. Lett., 2016, 115, 10002-1-10002-5. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Wang X.B., Tian S.F., Xu M.J., Zhang T.T., On integrability and quasi-periodic wave solutions to a (3+1)-dimensional generalized KdV-like model equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 2016, 283, 216-233. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Tian S.F., Initial-boundary value problems for the general coupled nonlinear Schrodinger equation on the interval via the Fokas method, J. Differ. Equations, 2017, 262, 506-558. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xin J., Guo B., Han Y., Huang D., The global solution of the (2+ 1)-dimensional long wave–short wave resonance interaction equation, J. Math. Phys., 2008, 49(7), 073504-1-073504-13. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Guo B.L., Wang B.X., The global solution and its long time behavior for a class of generalized LS type equations, Prog Nat. Sci., 1996, 6(5), 533–546. Google Scholar
Jafari H., Soltani R., Khalique C.M., Baleanu D., On the exact solutions of nonlinear long-short wave resonance equations, Rom. Rep. Phys., 2015, 67(3), 762–772. Google Scholar
Cimpoiasu R., Travelling wave solutions for the long-short wave resonance model by an improved G′/G-expansion method, Rom. J. Phys., 2018, (accepted paper), http://www.nipne.ro/rjp/accpaps/016-Cimpoi_3A41FA.pdf
Gurefe Y., Misirli E., Sonmezoglu A., Ekici M., Extended trial equation method to generalized nonlinear partial differential equations, App. Math. Comput., 2013, 219(10), 5253–5260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zayed E.M., Moatimid G.M., Al-Nowehy A.G., The generalized Kudryashov method and its applications for solving nonlinear PDEs in mathematical physics, Sci. J. Math. Res., 2015, 5, 19–39. Google Scholar
Liu C.S., Applications of complete discrimination system for polynomial for classifications of traveling wave solutions to nonlinear differential equations, Comput. Phys. Commun., 2010, 181(2), 317–324. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu W., Deng Z., Zhang Y., Multi-symplectic method for peakon-antipeakon collision of quasi-Degasperis-Procesi equation, Comput. Phys. Commun., 2014, 185, 2020-2028. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu W., Deng Z., Yin T., Almost structure-preserving analysis for weakly linear damping nonlinear Schrodinger equation with periodic perturbation, Commun Nonlinear Sci. Numer Simulat., 2017, 42, 298–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu W., Deng Z., Competition between geometric dispersion and viscous dissipation in wave propagation of KdV-Burgers equation, J. Vib. Control, 2015, 21, 2937-2945. Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2018-07-19
Citation Information: Open Physics, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 419–426, ISSN (Online) 2391-5471, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2018-0057.
© 2018 Rodica Cimpoiasu and Alina Streche Pauna, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0