Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2558-9652
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Aspects of using biomass as energy source for power generation

Raluca-Nicoleta Tîrtea / Cosmin Mărculescu
Published Online: 2017-08-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0019

Abstract

Biomass represents an important source of renewable energy in Romania with about 64% of the whole available green energy. Being a priority for the energy sector worldwide, in our country the development stage is poor compared to solar and wind energy. Biomass power plants offer great horizontal economy development, local and regional economic growth with benefic effects on life standard. The paper presents an analysis on biomass to power conversion solutions compared to fossil fuels using two main processes: combustion and gasification. Beside the heating value, which can be considerably higher for fossil fuels compared to biomass, a big difference between fossil fuels and biomass can be observed in the sulphur content. While the biomass sulphur content is between 0 and approximately 1%, the sulphur content of coal can reach 4%. Using coal in power plants requires important investments in installations of flue gas desulfurization. If limestone is used to reduce SO2 emissions, then additional carbon dioxide moles will be released during the production of CaO from CaCO3. Therefore, fossil fuels not only release a high amount of carbon dioxide through burning, but also through the caption of sulphur dioxide, while biomass is considered CO2 neutral. Biomass is in most of the cases represented by residues, so it is a free fuel compared to fossil fuels. The same power plant can be used even if biomass or fossil fuels is used as a feedstock with small differences. The biomass plant could need a drying system due to high moisture content of the biomass, while the coal plant will need a desulfurization installation of flue gas and additional money will be spent with fuel purchasing.

Keywords: combustion; energy; fossil fuels; biomass; sulfur content

References

  • Eurostat. (2016). Agricultural production - crops - Statistics Explained available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agricultural_production_-_crops – Last accessed 03.02.2017, 14:50.

  • Agropower Energy. (na). Agro-Biomasa – http://www.agropower-energy.ro/index.php?page=agro-biomasa – Last Accessed 03.02.2017, 14:15.

  • Badea, A. A., Cenuşă, V., & Ciobanu, M. C. (2013). Surse regenerabile de energie. AGIR.Google Scholar

  • Basu, P. (2006). Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds. CRC press.Google Scholar

  • Basu, P. (2013). Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory. Academic press.Google Scholar

  • BIOMASA FINEX Cercetare Energii si Tehnologii Neconventionale - http://www.finex-energy.ro/biomasa - Last Accessed 03.02.2017, 13:30.

  • Channiwala, S.A., & Parikh, P.P. (2002). A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel, 81(8), 1051-1063.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crocker, M. (Ed.). (2010). Thermochemical conversion of biomass to liquid fuels and chemicals (No. 1). Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar

  • Crocker, M. (Ed.). (2010). Thermochemical conversion of biomass to liquid fuels and chemicals (No. 1). Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar

  • EB 20 Report (2005). Annex 8 Clarifications on definition of biomass and consideration of changes in carbon pools due to a CDM project activityGoogle Scholar

  • Fauklker, L., & de Souza-Santos, M.L. (2010). Solid Fuels Combustion and Gasification.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Higman, C., & Van Der Burgt, M. (2003). Gasification. Gulf Professional Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, B.M., & Ebeling, J.M. (1985). Thermochemical properties of biomass fuels. California Agriculture, 39(5/6), 14-16.Google Scholar

  • Koppejan, J., & Van Loo, S. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Mishra, I.B. (2012). Training manual on CFBC boilers (non reheat).Google Scholar

  • Rezaiyan, J., & Cheremisinoff, N.P. (2005). Gasification technologies: a primer for engineers and scientists. CRC press.Google Scholar

  • Rezultate IFN – Ciclul I (2008-2012) – http://roifn.ro/site/rezultate-ifn-1/ – Last Accessed 04.02.2017, 10:30.

  • Romaniei, G., & Unite, P.N. (2008). Strategia Nationala pentru Dezvoltare Durabila a Romaniei Orizonturi 2013-2020-2030. Bucureşti available at http://www.insse.ro/cms/files/IDDT,202012.Google Scholar

  • ROMSILVA – Regia Nationala a Padurilor – http://www.rosilva.ro/ – Last Accessed 04.02.2017, 10:30.

  • Rubin, E.S., Rao, A.B., & Berkenpas, M.B. (2007). Development and application of optimal design capability for coal gasification systems. Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar

  • Stevens, C. (2011). Thermochemical processing of biomass: conversion into fuels, chemicals and power. R. C. Brown (Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

  • Van der Meijden, C.M., Van der Drift, A., & Vreugdenhil, B.J. (2007, May). Experimental results from the allothermal biomass gasifier Milena. In Proceedings of 15th European Conference on Biomass for Energy Industry and Climate Protection, Berlin, Germany (pp. 7-11).Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2017-08-26

Published in Print: 2017-07-01


Citation Information: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 181–190, ISSN (Online) 2558-9652, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0019.

Export Citation

© 2017 Raluca-Nicoleta Tîrtea et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in