Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2558-9652
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Impact assessment on the performance of e-learning in corporate training programs in the context of globalization

Roxana Maria Gavril / Jan Kiehne / Christian Richard Hell / Carsten Kirschner
Published Online: 2017-08-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0043

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to identify the main criteria based on which e-Learning is used in organizational development with positive impact on business performance. Globalization has led to a multitude of changing markets, including learning and education. While quality production systems are implemented based on imposed standards, the business knowledge of employees varies in each country, mirroring the education system provided locally. The results are individually different knowledge gaps which challenged the learning industry to develop new strategies embedded in e-learning solutions. Major contribution to theory and practice on combining vision and spoken learning is brought by the work of psychologists and professors of education (Allen, 2012; Mayer, 2009; Hattie, 2009). Their innovations offered solutions for easy access to knowledge and implementation methods, as well as the documentation of the inclusion of videos in e-learning modules (Halls, 2012), offering teachers and trainers the possibility to create a live experience to trainees engaged in e-learning programs. This paper is based on data collected internationally and our empirical research undertaken in Romania, which is Europe’s main cluster for various production industries and world’s second for IT. Based on a questionnaire, we interviewed 18 multinational companies which perform parts of their business activities in Romania. Research results show that with the implementation of an effective e-learning strategy a 40-60% cost reduction, a complete measurability of the learning process and a standardized input and outcome of trainings has been achieved. This paper aims to highlight the impact of e-learning applied for business trainings within global developing companies. This study may be applicable to state education and thus could help to reduce the gap between local education and global expectations.

Keywords: e-learning; professional training; performance; globalization; standardization

Bibliography

  • Aldrich, C. (2005) Learning by Doing A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. Published by Pfeiffer, ISBN 978-07879-9735-1.Google Scholar

  • Aldrich, C. (2007) Simulations and the Future of Learning. Published by Pfeiffer, ISBN 978-0787969622.Google Scholar

  • Allen, M. W. (2012) Leaving ADDIE for SAM: An Agile Model for Developing the Best Learning Experiences. Published by ASTD Press, ISBN 978-1-56286-711-9. Google Scholar

  • Allen, M. W. (2016) Michael Allen’s Guide to e-Learning: Building Interactive, Fun and Effective Learning Programs for Any Company. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc New Jersey, USA, ISBN 9781119046325.Google Scholar

  • Beege, M; Schneider, S; Nebel, S; Rey, G. D. (2017). Look into my eyes! Exploring the effect of addressing in educational videos; Learning and Instruction Volume 49, p.p. 113-120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.004. Received 29 July 2016, Revised 4 January 2017, Accepted 13 January 2017, Available online 22 January 2017.Google Scholar

  • Clark, R. C.; Mayer, E. R. (2016). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, Fourth Edition. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 9781119158660.Google Scholar

  • Cullen, J. B.; Parboteeah, P. K. (2014) Multinational Management: A Strategic Approach, 6e. Published by Cengage Learning, ISBN 978-1-285-09494-6.Google Scholar

  • Chang, Y. C., Kao, W. Y., Chu, C. P., & Chiu, C. H (2009). A learning style classification mechanism for e-learning. Published in Computers and Education Journal, Vol. 53(2), p.p. 273-285; DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, R.C.; Nguyen, F. & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. ISBN 0-7879-7728-4.Google Scholar

  • Gipple, J. (2012). Is e-learning Worth it? e-learning Cost Analysis. Published by ICS Learning Group, 410-975-9440; www.icslearninggroup.com.Google Scholar

  • Hattie, J. (2009) Visible Learning A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Published by Routledge, ISBN 978-0-415-47618-8; Google Scholar

  • Halls, J. (2012) Rapid Video Development For Trainers. Published by ASTD Press, ISBN 978-1-56286-811-6. Google Scholar

  • Heinemann, B.; Floricel, T.; Gavril, R.; Golowko, N. (2016) Study on the international forms of cooperation in the context of globalization. 27th International Business Information Management (IBIMA) Conference, IMEEV, 5/4/2016. Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020, p.p. 2418-2427, ISSN, ISBN 978-0-9860419-6-9.Google Scholar

  • Wagner, T. (2010). The Global Achievement Gap. Revised edition published 2014 by Basic Books, Persus Books Group, ISBN 978-0-465-05596-8.Google Scholar

  • Marquardt, K., Olaru, M. and Ceausu, I. (2017). Study on the Development of Quality Measurements Models for Steering Business Services in Relation to Customer Satisfaction. Amfiteatru Economic, Volume 19(44), p.p. 95-109. http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/RevistaDetalii_EN.aspx?Cod=1063.Google Scholar

  • Mateiu, A., Mateescu, R. M., Buchmüller, M., Just, V. (2016) Governance as a key factor for ensuring the sustainability of outsourcing models, Conference ISI Proceedings, The 4th International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ICMLG 2016), p.p. 466-474, ISBN: 978-1-910810-84-2, Paper in progress of being indexed in ISI Web of Knowledge.Google Scholar

  • Mayadas, F; Miller, G; Sener, J. (2015) Definitions of E-Learning Courses and Programs Version 2.0, https://online-learningconsortium.org/updated-e-learning-definitions-2/ Presented within the 21st Annual Online Learning Consortium International Conference 2015; http://olc.online-learningconsortium.org/conference/2015/aln/definitions-e-learning-courses-and-programs-conversation.Google Scholar

  • Mayer R. E. (2009) Multimedia Learning, 2nd edition. Published by Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-73535-5. Google Scholar

  • Mayer R. E. (2014) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. 2nd edition. Published by Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-1-107-61031-6.Google Scholar

  • Meyer, L. D. (2009). “The Poverty of Constructivism”. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Volume 41(3) p.p. 332–341. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00457.x.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mishra, S.; Ramesh, S. C. (2005). Interactive Multimedia in Education and Training. Published by Idea Group Publishing, ISBN 1-59140-393-6.Google Scholar

  • Phillips, P.; Phillips, J.; Ray, R. (2015). Measuring the Success of Leadership Development. A Step-by-Step Guide for Measuring Impact and Calculating ROI. Published by: ATD Press, ISBN 978-1-56286-942-7.Google Scholar

  • Roelle, J; Hiller, S; Berthold, K; Rumann, S (2017) Example-based learning: The benefits of prompting organization before providing examples, DOI: 10.1016, Learning and Instruction, 2017, Volume 49, p.p. 1-12, ISSN 0959-4752, PUB-ID 2908371.Google Scholar

  • Roy, K. (2006). The impact of learning styles on interactivity in asynchronous e-learning. Published online in Wiley Intersience DOI:10.1002/pfi026; International Society for Performance Improvement, Volume 45(10), p.p. 21-26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schroeder, U.; Spannagel, C. (2006). Supporting the Active Learning Process. International Journal on E-learning, Volume 5(2) Published by: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), ISSN 1537-2456.Google Scholar

  • Wagner, T. (2010). The Global Achievement Gap. Revised edition published 2014 by Basic Books, Persus Books Group, ISBN 978-0-465-05596-8.Google Scholar

  • Walliker, P. T. (2005). Cost comparison: Instructor-led vs. e-learning. LearningCircuits, (June), http://ciofs.net/fad/auxilium/af_06-07/amdel/materialidocenti/ercole/cost_comparison_instructor_led_vs_e-learning.pdf.

About the article

Published Online: 2017-08-26

Published in Print: 2017-07-01


Citation Information: Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 398–410, ISSN (Online) 2558-9652, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0043.

Export Citation

© 2017 Roxana Maria Gavril et al., published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in