Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics

Editor-in-Chief: Schöner, Gregor

1 Issue per year

CiteScore 2017: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.104

ICV 2017: 99.90

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Attitudes towards service robots in domestic environments: The role of personality characteristics, individual interests, and demographic variables

Natalia Reich / Friederike Eyssel
  • Corresponding author
  • Center of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-12-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjbr-2013-0014


The majority of EU citizens report a positive view about robots in general according to recent EU-level survey data. However, does this also hold true for attitudes towards service robots in particular? To investigate this research question, we conducted a survey on a representative sample from Germany. Importantly, we explored the role of demographic variables, interest in science and technology, and personality traits associated with psychological anthropomorphism in determining perceived acceptance of service robots in everyday life. Overall, attitudes towards service robots turned out to be relatively positive. Moreover, demographic variables (e.g., gender, occupation), interest in science and technology, and dispositional correlates of anthropomorphism had a significant impact on attitudes towards such assistive technology.

Keywords: service robots; attitude; acceptance of robots; anthropomorphism; human-robot interaction

  • [1] International Federation of Robotics, “Service robots [Provisional definition of service robots],” n.d., Retrieved from http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/Google Scholar

  • [2] International Federation of Robotics Statistical Department, “World robotics 2012 service robots,” 2012, Retrieved from http://www.ifr.org/service-robots/statistics/Google Scholar

  • [3] N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism,” Psychological Re-view, vol. 114, pp. 864-886, 2007.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [4] A. Waytz, C. K. Morewedge, N. Epley, G. Monteleone, J. H. Gao, and J. T. Cacioppo, “Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism,” Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, vol. 99, pp. 410-435, 2010.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [5] K. Zawieksa, B. R. Duffy, and A. Sprónska, “Understanding anthropomorphisation in social robotics,” Pomiary AutomatykaRobotyka, vol. 11, pp. 78-82, 2012.Google Scholar

  • [6] F. Eyssel and N. Reich,“Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots). On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism,” Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2013), pp. 121-122, 2013.Google Scholar

  • [7] J. T. Cacioppo, R. E. Petty, and C. F. Kao, “The efficient assessment of need for cognition,” Journal of Personality Assess-ment, vol. 48, pp. 306-307, 1984.Google Scholar

  • [8] K. O. Arras and D. Cerqui, “Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000-people survey,” Technical Report Nr. 0605-001, Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), pp. 1-38, 2005.Google Scholar

  • [9] I. H. Kuo, J. M. Rabindran, E. Broadbent, Y. I. Lee, N. Kerse, R. M. Q. Stafford, and B. A. MacDonald, “Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots,” Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Toyama, Japan, pp. 214-219, 2009.Google Scholar

  • [10] S. Meyer, Mein Freund der Roboter. Servicerobotik für ältere Menschen - eine Antwort auf den demografischen Wandel [My friend the robot. Service robotics for elderly - an answer to the demographic change?], Berlin: VDE, 2011.Google Scholar

  • [11] E. Broadbent, I. Kuo, Y. I. Lee, J. Rabindran, N. Kerse, R. M. Q. Stafford, and B. A. MacDonald, “Attitudes and reactions to a healthcare robot,” Telemedicine and e-Health, vol. 16, pp. 608-613, 2010.Google Scholar

  • [12] C. Bartneck, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and T. Nomura, “The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitudes towards robots,” AI & Society - The Journal of Human-Centred Systems, vol. 21, pp. 217-230, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [13] T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kato, “Prediction of human behavior in human-robot interaction using psychological scales for anxiety and negative attitudes toward robots,” IEEE Transac-tions on Robotics, vol. 24, pp. 442-451, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [14] T. Nomura, T. Kanda, and T. Suzuki, “Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human-robot interaction,” AI & Society - The Journal of Human-CentredSystems, vol. 20, pp.138-150, 2006.Google Scholar

  • [15] T. Nomura, T. Suzuki, T. Kanda, and K. Kato, “Measurement of anxiety toward robots,” Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 372-377, 2006.Google Scholar

  • [16] European Commission, “Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382,” September 2012.Google Scholar

  • [17] K. Olsen, C. Camp, and D. Fuller, “Curiosity and need for cognition,” Psychological Reports, vol. 54, pp. 71-74, 1984.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] H. Bless, M. Wänke, G. Bohner, R.F. Fellhauer, and N. Schwarz, “Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: a scale for measuring commitment and joy in problem solving],” Zeitschriftfür Sozialpsychologie, vol. 25, pp. 147-154, 1994.Google Scholar

  • [19] J. M. Burger and H. M. Cooper, “The desirability for control,” Mo-tivation and Emotion, vol. 3, pp. 381-393, 1979.Google Scholar

  • [20] J. M. Burger, “Desire for control and achievement-related behaviors,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 48, pp. 1520-1533, 1985.Google Scholar

  • [21] J. M. Burger and L. T. Hemans, “Desire for control and the use of attribution processes,” Journal of Personality, vol. 56, pp. 531-546, 1988.Google Scholar

  • [22] R. F. Baumeister and M. R. Leary, “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 117, pp. 497-529, 1995.Google Scholar

  • [23] J. K. Maner, C. N. DeWall, R. F. Baumeister, and M. Schaller, “Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”,” Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, vol. 92, pp. 42-55, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [24] K. M. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Kim, and S. R. Kim, “Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human-robot interaction,” International Journal ofHuman-Computer Studies, vol. 64, pp. 962-973, 2006.Google Scholar

  • [25] N. Epley, A. Waytz, S. Akalis, and J. T. Cacioppo, “When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism,” SocialCognition, vol. 26, pp.143-155, 2008.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [26] N. Epley, S. Akalis, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, “Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: Loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds,” Psycho-logical Science, vol.19, pp.114-120, 2008.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [27] D. Hanson, “Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots,” Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Workshop toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, Stresa, Italy, pp. 39-42, 2006.Google Scholar

  • [28] C. Bartneck, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita, “My robotic Doppelgänger - A critical look at the uncanny valley,” Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, Japan, pp. 269-276, 2009.Google Scholar

  • [29] C. Jacobi, J. Brand-Jacobi, J. Westenhöfer, and A. Weddige- Diedrichs, “ZurErfassung von Selbstkontrolle: Entwicklungeinerdeutschsprachigen Form des Self-Control-Schedule und der Desirability of Control Scale [The measurement of self-control: Development of a German-language version of the self-controlschedule and desirability of control scale],” Diagnostica, vol. 32, pp. 229-247, 1986.Google Scholar

  • [30] N. Döring and J. Bortz, “PsychometrischeEinsamkeitsforschung: Deutsche Neukonstruktion der UCLA-Loneliness Scale [Psychometric loneliness research: German new construction of the UCLA loneliness scale],” Diagnostica, vol. 39, pp. 224-239, 1993. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-10

Published in Print: 2013-12-01

Citation Information: Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 123–130, ISSN (Print) 2081-4836, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pjbr-2013-0014.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in