Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics

Editor-in-Chief: Schöner, Gregor

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2017: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.104

ICV 2017: 99.90

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-4836
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Towards animal-friendly machines

Oliver Bendel
Published Online: 2018-08-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2018-0019

Abstract

Semi-autonomous machines, autonomous machines and robots inhabit closed, semi-closed and open environments. There they encounter domestic animals, farm animals, working animals and/or wild animals. These animals could be disturbed, displaced, injured or killed. Within the context of machine ethics, the School of Business FHNW developed several design studies and prototypes for animal-friendly machines,which can be understood as moral machines in the spirit of this discipline. They were each linked with an annotated decision tree containing the ethical assumptions or justifications for interactions with animals. Annotated decision trees are seen as an important basis in developing moral machines. They are not without problems and contradictions, but they do guarantee well-founded, secure actions that are repeated at a certain level. This article documents completed and current projects, compares their relative risks and benefits, and makes proposals for future developments in machine ethics. The findings in this article and proposals for the future hope to systemically promote animal well-being and prevent animal suffering in encounters between machines and animals.

Keywords: machine ethics; roboethics; artificial intelligence; robotics; animal ethics; animal welfare; decision trees; annotated decision trees

References

  • [1] M. Azad-Manjiri, A new architecture for making moral agents based on C4.5 decision tree algorithm, International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS), 2014, 6(5), 50-57Google Scholar

  • [2] O. Bendel, Einfache moralische Maschinen: Vom Design zur Konzeption, In: T. Barton, B. Erdlenbruch, F. Herrmann et al. (Eds.), Prozesse, Technologie, Anwendungen, Systeme und Management, mana-Buch, 2015, 171-180Google Scholar

  • [3] O. Bendel, Considerations about the relationship between animal and machine ethics, AI & SOCIETY, 2016, 31(1), 103-108Google Scholar

  • [4] O. Bendel, Advanced driver assistance systems and animals, Künstliche Intelligenz, 2014, 28(4), 263-269Google Scholar

  • [5] C. Mancini, Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI): a manifest, Interactions, 2011, 18(4), 69-73Google Scholar

  • [6] M. Anderson, S. L. Anderson, Machine Ethics, Cambridge University Press, 2011Google Scholar

  • [7] O. Bendel, Wirtschaftliche und technische Implikationen der Maschinenethik, Die Betriebswirtschaft, 4/2014, 237-248Google Scholar

  • [8] O. Bendel, Maschinenethik, Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Springer Gabler, 2012, http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Definition/maschinenethik.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • [9] O. Bendel, Tierethik, Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, Springer Gabler, 2014, http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Definition/tierethik.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • [10] S. Donaldson, W. Kymlicka, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar

  • [11] P. Singer, Practical Ethics, third edition, Cambridge University Press, 2011Google Scholar

  • [12] U. Wolf, Ethik der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung, Klostermann, 2012Google Scholar

  • [13] A. Fossgreen, Bei den Kühen piepts, Tages-Anzeiger, September 9, 2017, https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/wissen/bei-denkuehen- piepts/story/26203583Google Scholar

  • [14] S. Eichler, Sitzen statt bücken, DRadio Wissen, March 13, 2013, http://www.dradiowissen.de/erdbeerernte-sitzen-stattbuecken.35.de.html?dram:article_id=239972Google Scholar

  • [15] W. Pluta, Roboterwolf vertreibt Wildschweine, Golem, August 28, 2017, https://www.golem.de/news/landwirtschaftroboterwolf-vertreibt-wildschweine-1708-129719.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • [16] O. Bendel, Die Roboter sind unter uns, Netzwoche, 22/2014, 28Google Scholar

  • [17] F. Mondada, J. Halloy, A.Martinoli et al., A general methodology for the control of mixed natural-artificial societies, In: S. Kernbach (Ed.), Handbook of Collective Robotics: Fundamentals and Challenges, Taylor & Francis, 2013Google Scholar

  • [18] O. Bendel, Annotated decision trees for simple moralmachines, The 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, AAAI Press, 195-201Google Scholar

  • [19] J. Kolhagen, Autopiloten auf Rädern, Versicherungswirtschaft, June 1, 2013, Nr. 11, 70Google Scholar

  • [20] D. Stoller, Vollautomatisch und ohne Fahrer in der Stadt unterwegs, Ingenieur.de, July 15, 2013, http://www.ingenieur.de/Themen/Automobil/Vollautomatisch-Fahrer-in-Stadt-unterwegsGoogle Scholar

  • [21] O. Bendel, Fahrerassistenzsysteme aus ethischer Sicht, Zeitschrift für Verkehrssicherheit, 2/2014, 108-110Google Scholar

  • [22] O. Bendel, Ich bremse auch für Tiere: Überlegungen zu einfachen moralischenMaschinen, inside-it.ch, December 4, 2013, http://www.insideit.ch/articles/34646Google Scholar

  • [23] M. Kopf, Ein Beitrag zur modellbasierten, adaptiven Fahrerunterstützung für das Fahren auf deutschen Autobahnen, PhD thesis, VDI-Verlag, 1994Google Scholar

  • [24] L. M. Lorenz, Entwicklung und Bewertung aufmerksamkeitslenkender Warn- und Informationskonzepte für Fahrerassistenzsysteme: Aufmerksamkeitssteuerung in der frühen Phase kritischer Verkehrssituationen, PhD thesis, TU München, München, 2014Google Scholar

  • [25] W. Pluta, EU-Projekt Timon vernetzt Fußgänger, Autofahrer und Radler, Golem, September 1, 2017, https://www.golem.de/news/verkehrssicherheit-eu-projekt-timon-vernetztfussgaenger-autofahrer-und-radler-1709-129669.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • [26] O. Bendel, LADYBIRD: the animal-friendly robot vacuumcleaner, The 2017 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, AAAI Press, 2-6Google Scholar

  • [27] J. Hueber, Wir sehen Farbe - das können Sensoren auch! SENSOR MAGAZIN, 1/2013, 8-11Google Scholar

  • [28] A. Brisevac, S. Calcagno, B. Stierli, LADYBIRD: Projektdokumentation, School of Business FHNW, 2017Google Scholar

  • [29] O. Bendel, Das LADYBIRD-Projekt, In:O. Bendel (Ed.), Handbuch Maschinenethik, Springer Reference Geisteswissenschaften, Springer VS, 2018Google Scholar

  • [30] O. Bendel, Service robots in public spaces, Telepolis, June 25, 2017, https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Service-Robotsin-Public-Spaces-3754173.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • [31] N. Zhou, Volvo admits its self-driving cars are confused by kangaroos, The Guardian, July 1, 2017, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/jul/01/volvoadmits-its-self-driving-cars-are-confused-by-kangaroosGoogle Scholar

  • [32] T. Wimmer, M. Israel, P. Haschberger et al., Rehkitzrettung mit dem Fliegenden Wildretter: Erfahrungen der ersten Feldeinsätze, Bornimer Agrartechnische Berichte, 2013, 81, 85-95Google Scholar

  • [33] U. Binder, Der Bauer wird digitalisiert, Swisscom, October 11, 2017, https://www.swisscom.ch/de/storys/technologie/smarte-landwirtschaft.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • [34] S. Federle, Radar soll Zugvögel schützen, Tierwelt, Nr. 10,March 5, 2014, 22-23Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2017-12-27

Accepted: 2018-06-12

Published Online: 2018-08-28


Citation Information: Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 204–213, ISSN (Online) 2081-4836, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2018-0019.

Export Citation

© by Oliver Bendel, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in