Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics

Editor-in-Chief: Schöner, Gregor


Covered by SCOPUS


CiteScore 2018: 2.17

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.336
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.707

ICV 2017: 99.90

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2081-4836
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Ethics and inscription in social robot design. A visual ethnography

Jamie Wallace
Published Online: 2019-01-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0003

Abstract

In this paper, by turning to examples of visual inscriptions adopted within HRI research, and more specifically social robotic interaction, I wish to explore through visual ethnography some of the challenges faced in designing ethical robots. Firstly, visual ethnography allows for an alternative categorisation of the inscriptions of HRI based on visual characteristics. Secondly, visual inscriptions show multiple and paradoxical meanings when appearing juxtaposed revealing challenges of diminished and asymmetric consideration of human orientated concerns in favour of technical and experimental certainty. Thirdly, by taking a human orientated perspective of experimental arrangements, the understanding of ethics becomes a way of framing and of looking at inscriptions. The paper calls for a better understanding of the role of inscription practices in HRI generally in order to find new approaches useful to bolster a more robust inclusion of ethics within the field.

Keywords: visual studies; visual ethnography; ethics; design inscriptions; visual inscriptions; design representation; design artifacts; HRI; social robotics; visual analysis

References

  • [1] J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, I. van de Poel, Design for values: An introduction, In: J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015, 1-7Google Scholar

  • [2] J. Davis, L. P. Nathan, Value sensitive design: applications, adaptations, and critiques, In: J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design, Springer, Dordrecht, 2015, 11-40Google Scholar

  • [3] M. M. Bakhtin, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin, 2010Google Scholar

  • [4] K. Knorr Cetina, Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies, Theory, Culture and Society, 1997, 14(4), 1-43CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] K. Knorr Cetina, Objectual practice, In: T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, Routledge, London, 2001, 175-188Google Scholar

  • [6] R.Wiles, A. Clark, J. Prosser, Visual research ethics at the crossroads, In: E. Margolis, L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, SAGE Publications, London, 2011, 685Google Scholar

  • [7] S. Frennert, B. Östlund, Review: Seven matters of concern of social robots and older people, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2014, 6(2), 299-310Google Scholar

  • [8] G. Herrmann, M. Pearson, A. Lenz, P. Bremner, A. Spiers, U. Leonards (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2013), Bristol, UK, October 27-29, 2013, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8239, Springer, Cham, 2013Google Scholar

  • [9] M. Beetz, B. Johnston, M.-A. Williams (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2014), Sydney, NSW, Australia, October 27- 29, 2014, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 8755, Springer, Cham, 2014Google Scholar

  • [10] A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2015), Paris, France, October 26-30, 2015, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015Google Scholar

  • [11] A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2016), Kansas City, MO, USA, November 1-3, 2016, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016Google Scholar

  • [12] G. Goldschmidt, The dialectics of sketching, Creativity Research Journal, 1991, 4(2), 123-143CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] G. Goldschmidt, On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture, Design Studies, 1994, 15(2), 158-174CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] D. A. Schön, G. Wiggins, Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 1992, 13(2), 135-156CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] M. Suwa, J. Gero, T. Purcell, Unexpected discoveries and Sinvention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process, Design Studies, 2000, 21(6), 539-567CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] A. Ioannou, I. Kartapanis, P. Zaphiris, Social robots as cotherapists in autism therapy sessions: a single-case study, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 255-263Google Scholar

  • [17] M. Lewis, E. Oleari, C. Pozzi, L. Cañamero, An embodied AI approach to individual differences: supporting self-eflcacy in diabetic children with an autonomous robot, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 401-410Google Scholar

  • [18] Y. M. Foong, X. Liu, S. S. Ge, J. Guo, Mechanical design of Christine, the social robot for the service industry, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 819-828Google Scholar

  • [19] J. R. Orejana, B. A. MacDonald, H. S. Ahn, K. Peri, E. Broadbent, Healthcare robots in homes of rural older adults, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 512-521Google Scholar

  • [20] V. Gonzalez-Pacheco, M. Malfaz, J. C. Castillo, A. Castro- Gonzalez, F. Alonso-Martín, M. A. Salichs, How much should a robot trust the user feedback? Analyzing the impact of verbal answers in active learning, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 190-199Google Scholar

  • [21] A. Meghdari, M. Alemi, A. G. Pour, A. Taheri, Spontaneous human-robot emotional interaction through facial expressions, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 351-361Google Scholar

  • [22] D. Cazzato, P. L. Mazzeo, P. Spagnolo, C. Distante, Automatic joint attention detection during interaction with a humanoid robot, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 124-134Google Scholar

  • [23] V. H. Andaluz, D. Pérez, D. Sáchez, C. Bucay, C. Sáchez, V. Morales, D. Rivas, Nonlinear controller of arachnid mechanism based on Theo Jansen, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham, 2016, 328-339Google Scholar

  • [24] L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Actionable Knowledge, Springer, Dordrecht, 2017Google Scholar

  • [25] L. Verschaffel, E. de Corte, T. de Jong, J. Elen (Eds.), Use of Representations in Reasoning and Problem Solving Analysis and Improvement, Routledge, London, 2010Google Scholar

  • [26] S. Pink, Digital visual anthropology: Potentials and challenges, In: A. I. Alfonso, L. Kurti, S. Pink (Eds.), Working Images: Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography, Routledge, New York, 2004, 1Google Scholar

  • [27] K. Henderson, The visual culture of engineers, In: S. L. Star (Ed.), The Cultures of Computing, Blackwell, Cambridge, 1995Google Scholar

  • [28] K. Henderson, On Line, on Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, andComputer Graphics in Design Engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1999Google Scholar

  • [29] L. L. Bucciarelli, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994Google Scholar

  • [30] S. E. Newman, Here, there, and nowhere at all: Distribution, negotiation, and virtuality in postmodern ethnography and engineering, Knowledge and Society, 1998, 11, 235-267Google Scholar

  • [31] J. Hindmarsh, C. Heath, Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 2000, 29(5), 523-562CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] J. Wallace, Different matters of invention: design work as the transformation of dissimilar design artefacts, PhD dissertation, Aarhus University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010Google Scholar

  • [33] J. K. Whyte, B. Ewenstein, M. Hales, J. Tidd, Visual practices and the objects used in design. Build. Res. Inf., 2007, 35(1), 18CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] S. Pink, D. Tutt, A. Dainty, A. Gibb, Ethnographic methodologies for construction research: knowing, practice and interventions, Building Research and Information, 2010, 38(6), 647-659Google Scholar

  • [35] J. Elkins, The Domain of Images, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2001Google Scholar

  • [36] W. M. Roth, M. K. McGinn, Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice, Review of Educational Research, 1998, 68(1), 35-59Google Scholar

  • [37] H. U. Gumbrecht, Perception versus sciences: Moving pictures and their resistance to interpretation, In: T. Lenoir (Ed.), Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1998, 351-364Google Scholar

  • [38] H. A. Horst, D. Miller (Eds.), Digital Anthropology, A&C Black, London, 2013Google Scholar

  • [39] D. Warr, M. Guillemin, S. Cox, J. Waycott, Ethics and Visual Research Methods - Theory, Methodology, and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan US, Basingstoke, 2016Google Scholar

  • [40] J. G. Greeno, R. P. Hall, Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms, Phi Delta Kappan, 1997, 78(5), 361-367Google Scholar

  • [41] J. R. Orejana, B. A. MacDonald, H. S. Ahn, K. Peri, E. Broadbent, Healthcare robots in homes of rural older adults, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J. C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2015, 512-521Google Scholar

  • [42] P. Alves-Oliveira, T. Ribeiro, S. Petisca, E. Di Tullio, F. S. Melo, A. Paiva, An empathic robotic tutor for school classrooms: considering expectation and satisfaction of children as end-users, In: A. Tapus, E. André, J.-C. Martin, F. Ferland, M. Ammi (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388, Springer, Cham, 2016, 21-30Google Scholar

  • [43] H. Cheng, Z. Liu, L. Yang, X. Chen, Sparse representation and learning in visual recognition: Theory and applications, Signal Processing, 2013, 93(6), 1408-1425Google Scholar

  • [44] R. Coover, Interactive media representation, In: E. Margolis, L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods, SAGE Publications, London, 2011, 619-638Google Scholar

  • [45] J. Drucker, Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2014Google Scholar

  • [46] R. Barthes, The third meaning, In: S. Manghani, A. Piper, J. Simons (Eds.), Images: A Reader, SAGE Publications, London, 2006, 109Google Scholar

  • [47] J. Berger, J. Mohr, Another Way of Telling, Pantheon, New York, 1982Google Scholar

  • [48] C. Goodwin, Professional vision, American Anthropologist, 1994, 96(3), 606-633CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [49] B. Latour, Drawing things together, In: M. Lynch, S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990, 19-68Google Scholar

  • [50] B. Latour, S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts., SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, 1979Google Scholar

  • [51] A. Sharkey, N. Sharkey, Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly, Ethics and Information Technology, 2012, 14(1), 27-40Google Scholar

  • [52] J. Welge, M. Hassenzahl, Better than human: about the psychological superpowers of robots, In: A. Agah, J. J. Cabibihan, A. M. Howard, M. A. Salichs, H. He (Eds.), Social Robotics, ICSR 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979, Springer, Cham 2016, 993-1002Google Scholar

  • [53] M. Banks, D. Zeitlyn, Visual Methods in Social Research, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2015Google Scholar

  • [54] G. Rose, Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials, SAGE Publications, London, 2016Google Scholar

  • [55] K. Hentschel, Visual Cultures in Science and Technology: A Comparative History, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014Google Scholar

  • [56] J. J. Larkin, H. A. Simon, Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words, Cognitive Science, 1987, 11, 65-69CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [57] S. Pink, Digital visual anthropology: Potentials and challenges, In: M. Banks, J. Ruby (Eds.), Made to be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2011, 209-233Google Scholar

  • [58] P. Atkinson, M. Hammersley, Ethnography and participant observation, In: N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, SAGE Publications, ThousandOaks, 1994, 248-261Google Scholar

  • [59] C. Denton, Examining documentary photography using the creative method, In: K. L. Smith, S. Moriarty, K. Kenney, G. Barbatsis (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media, Routledge, London, 2005, 405-428Google Scholar

  • [60] S. Jasanoff, S. H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2015Google Scholar

  • [61] K. Knorr Cetina, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999Google Scholar

  • [62] H. Rheinberger, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1997Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2018-06-29

Accepted: 2018-10-04

Published Online: 2019-01-18

Published in Print: 2019-01-01


Citation Information: Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 66–76, ISSN (Online) 2081-4836, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0003.

Export Citation

© by Jamie Wallace, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License. BY 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in