1. Trompetto M, CornagliaS: ThePerineal Approach to Rectal Prolapse. Pelvic Floor Disorders 2010; 48: 509-14.Google Scholar
2. Schiedeck THK , Schwandner O, Scheele J et al.: Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005; 390: 8-14Google Scholar
4. Sthela M. Murad-Regadas MD , Rodrigo A et al.: The Abdominal Approach to Rectal Prolapse. PelvicFloor Disorders 2010; 497-508.Google Scholar
5. Moody RL : Rectal prolapse. In: Morson BC (red) Diseases of the colon, rectum and anus. Appleton- Century-Crofts: New York, 1969; 238-50.Google Scholar
6. Mikulicz-Radecki J: Zuroperativenbehandlung des prolapsus recti et coli invaginati. Arch KlinChir 1889; 38: 74-97.Google Scholar
8. Moschcowitz AV: The pathogenesis, anatomy and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1912; 15: 7-21.Google Scholar
9. Denet CH : Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. (In:. Godeberge P (ed.) Anorectal diseases. Medicine- Sciences Flammarion Paris 2008: 152-54.Google Scholar
10. Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH et al.: Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. ScandJ Surg 2005; 3: 207-10.Google Scholar
13. Roig JV, Buch E, Alós R et al.: Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse: differences between continent and incontinent individuals. RevEsp Enferm Dig 1998; 90: 794- 805.Google Scholar
14. Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MR B et al.: Anorectal function after abdominal rectopexy: parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg 1989; 76: 64-68Google Scholar
15. Broden G, Dolk A, Holmsrom B et al.: Evacuation difficulties and other characteristics of rectal function associated with procidentia and the Ripstein operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31: 233-36.Google Scholar
16. Sayfan J, Pinho M, Williams JA et al.: Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with marlexrectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 143-45.Google Scholar
18. Monro A: The morbid anatomy of the human gullet, stomach,and intestines. Archibald Constable & Co, Edinburgh 1811; 363.Google Scholar
22. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al.: A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Diseases ofthe Colon & Rectum 1996; 39: 681-85.Google Scholar
23. Wells C: New operation for rectal prolapse. ProcR Soc Med 1959; 52: 602-03.Google Scholar
24. Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC et al.: Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 904-22.Google Scholar
25. Frykman HM : Abdominal proctopexy and primary sigmoid resection for rectal procidentia. AmJ Surg 1955; 90: 780-89.Google Scholar
28. Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H et al.: Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 1993; 159: 301-05.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Polish Journal of Surgery
The Journal of Foundation of the Polish Journal of Surgery
12 Issues per year
CiteScore 2016: 0.29
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.166
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.207
Rectal Prolapse in Young Women
Rectal prolapse belongs to the group of rare diseases of the rectum and anus. It is mostly observed in elderly multiparous women in the seventh and eighth decade. The precise cause of this pathology is not thoroughly understood that is why there are no optimal standards of treatment.
The aim of the study was to present pathophysiology, diagnostics and optimal surgical procedures employed in young patients with rectal prolapse.
Material and methods. Out of a 56-patient group treated in Department of General and Colorectal Surgery in the years 2006-2011 a smaller one consisting of 11 young women between the ages 20-40 was selected. According to the literature this is a very rare time of the mentioned pathology occurrence. In the studied females grade of rectal prolapse as well as faecal incontinence based on Jorge-Wexner’s (Cleveland) scale were assessed before and after the operative treatment. All of them underwent transabdominal Wells and Frikman-Goldberg prolapse procedures.
Results. Transabdominal approaches repair pathologies of the pelvic floor and have promising longstanding results improving quality of life. No rectal prolapse recurrences were observed. The mean score of the Wexner’s grading system was 7.81 diminishing to 1.9 points postoperatively.
Conclusions. Rectal prolapse if untreated, is a pathology that substantially changes patients’ quality of life for the worse. Individual, standardized surgical approach to each patient is necessary. Transabdominal methods carry a low risk of complications and improve quality of life of young patients enabling a relatively quick return to normal life