Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

1 Issue per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Cognitive Profile of a Talented Foreign Language Learner. A Case Study

Adriana Biedroń / Anna Szczepaniak
Published Online: 2009-06-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/V10057-009-0004-7

The Cognitive Profile of a Talented Foreign Language Learner. A Case Study

The article examines a variety of cognitive individual variables of a talented foreign language learner. The research complies with the qualitative and quantitative criteria of choice of a talented learner proposed by Arancibia et al., (2008); Hartas et al., (2008); Hewston et al., (2005), and Skehan, (1998). Cognitive variables included tested: foreign language aptitude, verbal and non-verbal intelligence, learning styles, and learning strategies. The purpose of the research was to construct an extended cognitive profile of a 21-year-old student proficient in three languages. The research revealed that the subject is linguistically talented, especially in the area of phonological, analytical, and memory abilities. It is hypothesized that her superior abilities result from an extraordinarily efficient short-term phonological memory (Mackey et al., 2002). She uses miscellaneous learning strategies and her learning styles are versatile. The final conclusion is that research into linguistic talent is scarce, therefore further investigation, especially in the field of working memory of talented foreign language learners, is required.

Keywords: language aptitude; linguistic abilities; talent; cognitive factors; learning styles and strategies

  • Arancibia, W., Lissi, M.R., & Narca, M. (2008). Impact in the school system of a strategy for identifying and selecting academically talented students: the experience of Program PENTA- UC. High Ability Studies, 19/1, 53-63.Google Scholar

  • Atkins, P.W.B., & Baddeley, A. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 537-552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: an overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189-208.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language acquisition device. Psychological Review, 105, 158-173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bates, J., & Munday, S. (2005). Able, Gifted and Talented. London: The SEN series.Google Scholar

  • Brzezinski, J., Gaul, M., Hornowska, E., Machowski, A., & Zakrzewska, M. (1996). Skala inteligencji D. Wechslera dla doroslych. Wersja zrewidowana. WAIS-R (Pl). Podrěcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J.B. (1959). Use of the Modern Language Aptitude Test in Secondary Schools. Yearbook of the National Council on Measurements Used in Education, 16, 155-159.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J.B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K.C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, M. A: Newbury House.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J.B. (1985). Second language abilities. In R.J. Sternberg, (Ed.), Human abilities: an information-processing approach (pp. 83-101). New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

  • Carroll, J.B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Modern Language Aptitude Test. MLAT. Manual 2002 Edition. N. Bethesda, Maryland: Second Language Testing, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Corno, L, Cronbach, L.J., Kupermintz, H., Lohman, D.F., Mandinach, E.B., Porteus, A.W., & Talbert, J.E. (2002). Remaking the concept of aptitude: Extending the legacy of Richard E. Snow. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Crowell, S.E. (2004). The neurobiology of declarative memory. In: J.H. Schumann, (Ed.), The Neurobiology of Learning: Perspectives from Second Language Learning (pp. 75-109). Mahwah: LEA.Google Scholar

  • De Bot, K. (2006). The plastic bilingual brain: Synaptic pruning or growth? Commentary on Green et al. In M. Gullberg, & P. Indefrey (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 127-132). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Dörnyei, Z, & Skehan, P. (2005). Individual differences in second language learning. In: C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long, (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 589-630). United Kingdom: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Ehrman, M.E. (1996). Understanding Second Language Learning Difficulties. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

  • Ehrman, M. (1998). The Modern Language Aptitude Test for predicting learning success and advising students. Applied Language Learning, 9(1-2), 31-70.Google Scholar

  • Ehrman, M.E., & Oxford, R.L. (1995). Cognition plus: correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 7/1, 67-89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellis, R. (1995). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ellis, N.C., & Sinclair, S.G. (1996). Working memory in the acquisition of vocabulary and syntax: Putting language in good order. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 234-250.Google Scholar

  • Ely, Ch., M. (1995). Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in EFL/ESL Classroom (pp. 216-217). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/Thomson International.Google Scholar

  • Engle, R.W., Laughlin, J.E., Tuholski, S.W., & Conway, A.R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latentvariable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128/3, 309-331.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9/2, 147-171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fein, D., & Obler, L.K. (1988). Neuropsychological study of talent: a developing field. In L.K. Obler & D. Fein (Ed.), The Exceptional Brain (pp. 3-15). NY, London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Golestani, N., Paus, T., & Zatorre, R.J. (2002). Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron, 35, 997-1010.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Golestani, N., Molko, N., Dehaene, S., LeBihan, D., & Pallier, C. (2006). Brain structure predicts the learning of foreign speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17/3, 575-582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goswami, U. (2004). Neuroscience and education. British Journal of Educational Psychology 74, 1-14.Google Scholar

  • Grigorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J., & Ehrman, M.E. (2000). A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: the CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390-405CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19/3, 379-400.Google Scholar

  • Hartas, D., Lindsay, G., & Muijs, R. D (2008). Identifying and selecting able students for the NAGTY summer school: emerging issues and future considerations. High Ability Studies, 19/1, 5-18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hewston, R., Campbell, R.J., Eyre, D., Muijs, R.D., Neelands, J.G., & Robinson, W. (2005). A baseline review of the literature on effective pedagogies for gifted and talented students. Occasional Paper 5. Coventry: The University of Warwick.Google Scholar

  • Ioup, G., Boustagi, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Re-examining the CPH. A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73-98.Google Scholar

  • Krashen, S.D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

  • Mackey, A., Philip, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 181-209). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. W: A. Healy, L. Bourne (Ed.), Foreign Language Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 339-364.Google Scholar

  • Morgan, G., Smith, N., Tsimpli, I., & Woll, B. (2007). Classifier learning and modality in a polyglot savant. Lingua, 117/7, 1339-1353.Google Scholar

  • Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81-108.Google Scholar

  • Neufeld, G. (1979). Towards a theory of language learning aptitude. Language Learning, 29, 227-241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Něcka, E. (2003). Inteligencja. Geneza, Struktura, Funkcje. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.Google Scholar

  • Obler, L. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds.), Variation in Second Language Acquisition: Psycholinguistic Issues (pp. 141-159). Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

  • O'Maley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning Strategies and Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Oxford, R.L. (1990a). Styles, Strategies, and Aptitude: Connections for Language Learning. In T.S. Parry, & C.W. Stansfield (Eds.), Language Aptitude Reconsidered (pp. 67-125). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar

  • Oxford, R.L. (1990b). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.Google Scholar

  • Oxford, R.L. (1995). Style Analysis Survey. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in EFL/ESL Classroom (pp. 208-215). Boston: Heinle & Heinle/ Thomson International.Google Scholar

  • Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur Language Aptitude Battery (PLAB). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

  • Reid, J.M. (Ed.), (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle/ Thomson International.Google Scholar

  • Reid, J.M. (Ed.), (1998). Understanding Learning Styles in the Second Language Classroom. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.Google Scholar

  • Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory and the ‘noticing’ hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 99-140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA: A framework for research and pedagogy. In: P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 113-133). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Robinson P. (2005). Attention and memory during SLA. In: C.J. Doughty, & M.H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. (pp. 631-678). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Robinson P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts, and practice. In: R.M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in Second Language. (pp. 256-286). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rubin, J., & Wenden, A. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Sasaki, M. (1999). Second Language Proficiency, Foreign Language Aptitude, and Intelligence. Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Sawyer, M. & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 319-354). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior-genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconciliation. In: R.J. Sternberg, & E.L. Grigorenko, (Eds.), Intelligence, Heredity and Environment (pp. 3-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 127-158.Google Scholar

  • Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.Google Scholar

  • Schneiderman, E.I., & Desmarais, C. (1988). The talented language learner: some preliminary findings. Second Language Research, 4/2, 91-109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209-231.Google Scholar

  • Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21-50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

  • Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In: P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 69-95). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Smith N., & Tsimpli I. (1991). Linguistic modularity? A case study of a ‘savant’ linguist. Lingua, 84, 315-351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sparks, R.L., Artzer, M., Ganschow, L., Siebenhar, D., Plageman, M., & Patton, J. (1998a). Differences in native-language skills, foreign-language aptitude, and foreign language grades among high-, average-, and low-proficiency foreign language learners: two studies. Language Testing, 15, 181-216Google Scholar

  • Sparks, R.L., Javorsky, J., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1998b). Factors in the Prediction of Achievement and Proficiency in a Foreign Language. Applied Language Learning, 9/1, 71-105.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R.J. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence and its implications for language aptitude testing. In P. Robinson. (Ed.), Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning (pp. 13 - 43). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2000). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Threlfall, J., & Hargreaves, M. (2008). The problem-solving methods of mathematically gifted and older average-attaining students. High Ability Studies, 19/1, 83-98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wesche, M.B., Edwards, H. and Wells, W. (1982). Foreign language aptitude and intelligence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 127 - 140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojtowicz, M. (2006). Test Zdolności Jězykowych, TZJ (The Language Abilities Test). Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2009-06-15

Published in Print: 2009-01-01

Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 53–71, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/V10057-009-0004-7.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Sabrina Turker, Susanne M. Reiterer, Annemarie Seither-Preisler, and Peter Schneider
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, Volume 8
Mila Vulchanova, Joel B. Talcott, Valentin Vulchanov, and Margarita Stankova
Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2012, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 13

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in