Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

1 Issue per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Role of Gender-Biased Perceptions in Teacher-Student Interaction

Nana Berekashvili
Published Online: 2012-07-02 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0004-x

The Role of Gender-Biased Perceptions in Teacher-Student Interaction

Differences in teacher perceptions depending on student gender and their impact on teacher-student interaction was the focus of the study. The questions addressed were: the characteristics that teachers encourage and discourage in girls and boys; the patterns of their responses to students of different genders; perception of pupils' academic achievement, learning skills and giftedness; distribution of attention between girls and boys. The study revealed that in spite of better school results, girls' skills and talents are underestimated, expectations towards them are low and their behavior is restricted to stereotyped feminine roles. The majority of those surveyed support the idea that sex determines different abilities in different learning skills as regards school subjects. While girls, in teachers' opinion, insignificantly exceed boys in the humanities, boys entirely outdo girls in natural sciences and math. Teachers totally deny girls' abilities in sports. At the same time, most teachers are hardly aware of being gender-biased themselves.

Keywords: teacher-student interaction; gender biased perceptions; gender differences; expectations

  • Bem, S.L. (1993). The lenses of gender. Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

  • Berekashvili, N. (2011). Gender bias in Georgian school teachers' attitudes and behavior. In XV European Conference on Developmental Psychology ECDP (pp. 465-474.). Bologna: Medimond International Proceeding.Google Scholar

  • Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Education Psychology, 75 (5), 631-661.Google Scholar

  • Carli, L.L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55 (1), 81-99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caruthers, L. (2005). Classroom interactions and achievement. Mid-Atlantic Research for Education & Learning. Retrieved from: http://www.mcrel.org/products/noteworthy/noteworthy/loycec.asp http://www.mcrel.org/products/noteworthy/noteworthy/loycec.asp

  • Chapman, A. (2002). Gender Bias in Education. Research Room. Retrieved from: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html

  • Connell, R.W. (1983). Which way is up? Essays on sex, class and cult ure. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

  • Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. A social-role interpretation. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Ecclees, J. & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L.C. Wilkinson & C.B. Marret (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 79-114). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Good, T.L. & Brophy, J.E. (1987). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

  • Good, T.L. & Findley, M.J. (1985). Sex role expectations and achievement. In J.B. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 271-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Hallinan, M.T. & Sørensen, A.B. (1987). Ability grouping and sex differences in mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 60 (2), 63-72.Google Scholar

  • McCormick, P. (1995). Are girls taught to fail? U.S. Catholic, 60 (2), 38-42.Google Scholar

  • Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 176-179.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sadker, D. (1999). Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Educational Leadership, 56 (7), 22-26.Google Scholar

  • Sadker, M. & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

  • Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issues of gender bias in elementary and secondary education. The Review of Research in Education, 17 (7), 269-334Google Scholar

  • Scott, E. & McCollum, H. (1993). Making it happen: Gender equitable classrooms. In S.K. Biklen & D. Pollard (Eds.), Gender and Education. Part 1 (pp. 174-190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Reay, D. (2001). ‘Spice Girls’, ‘Nice Girls’, ‘Girlies’, and ‘Tomboys’: Gender discourses, girls' cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education, 13 (2), 153-166.Google Scholar

  • Shelley S.S. (2000). The relationship among teacher expectations, teacher attitudes toward the TAAS, and student achievement. Denton, TX: University of North Texas. Retrieved from: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2691/m2/1/high_res_d/Dissertation.pdf http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2691/m2/1/high_res_d/Dissertation.pdf

About the article

Published Online: 2012-07-02

Published in Print: 2012-01-01

Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 39–51, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0004-x.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Victoria Morrissette, Shannon Jesme, and Cheryl Hunter
Educational Studies, 2017, Page 1
Panagiotis Kiekkas, Michael Igoumenidis, Nikolaos Stefanopoulos, Nick Bakalis, Antonios Kefaliakos, and Diamanto Aretha
Nurse Education Today, 2016, Volume 45, Page 57
Ning Liu and Birgit Neuhaus
International Journal of Science Education, 2014, Volume 36, Number 10, Page 1531

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in