Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

The Journal of University of Warsaw

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2083-8506
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Social Structure and Language Structure: the New Nomothetic Approach

Seán Roberts
  • Corresponding author
  • Language Evolution and Computation Research Unit, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Dugald Stewart Building, 3 Charles Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AD
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ James Winters
Published Online: 2012-12-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6

Abstract

Recent studies have taken advantage of newly available, large-scale, cross-linguistic data and new statistical techniques to look at the relationship between language structure and social structure. These ‘nomothetic’ approaches contrast with more traditional approaches and a tension is observed between proponents of each method. We review some nomothetic studies and point out some challenges that must be overcome. However, we argue that nomothetic approaches can contribute to our understanding of the links between social structure and language structure if they address these challenges and are taken as part of a body of mutually supporting evidence. Nomothetic studies are a powerful tool for generating hypotheses that can go on to be corroborated and tested with experimental and theoretical approaches. These studies are highlighting the effect of interaction on language.

Keywords : nomothetic; social structure; complex adaptive systems; linguistic niche hypothesis; cultural evolution

  • Atkinson, Q. (2011a). Linking spatial patterns of language variation to ancient demography and population migrations. Linguistic Typology, 15 (2), 321-332.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, Q.D. (2011b). Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science, 332 (6027), 346-349.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, Q. (2012). Response to comments on phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science, 335 (6069), 657-657.Google Scholar

  • Atkinson, Q.D., Meade, A., Venditti, C., Greenhill, S.J., & Pagel, M. (2008). Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science, 319 (5863), 588.Google Scholar

  • Backhaus, J. & Junghanns, K. (2006). Daytime naps improve procedural motor memory. Sleep Medicine, 7, 508-512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1-26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bialystok, E. & Miller, B. (1999). The problems of age in second-language acquisi­tion: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2 (2), 127-145.Google Scholar

  • Bickel, B. & Nichols, J. (2008). Inflectional synthesis of the verb. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 22). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar

  • Birdsong, D. & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (2), 235-249.Google Scholar

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

  • Boguna, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., Diaz-Guilera, A., & Arenas, A. (2004). Models of social networks based on social distance attachment. Physical Review E, 70 (5), 056122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, M. (1973). Color vision and color naming: A psychophysiological hy­pothesis of cultural difference. Psychological Bulletin, 80 (4), 257-285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots: Lin­guistics in search of its evidential base (pp. 75-96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Burkett, D. & Griffiths, T. (2010). Iterated learning of multiple languages from multiple teachers. In A. Smith, M. Schouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference EVO- LANG 8 (pp. 58-65). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Bybee, J. (2011). How plausible is the hypothesis that population size and dispersal are related to phoneme inventory size? introducing and commenting on a debate. Linguistic Typology, 15 (2), 147-153.Google Scholar

  • Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2005). The evolutionary origin of morphology. In M. Taller- man (Ed.), Language origins: Perspectives on evolution (pp. 166-184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Central Intelligence Agency (2009). Sex Ratio. In The World Factbook 2009. Wash­ington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar

  • Chambers, J.K. (1995). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

  • Christiansen, M.H. & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31 (5), 489-508; discussion 509-58.Google Scholar

  • Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and non-native language processing. Language Learning, 60 (1), 21-43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Croft, W. (2010). The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experi­ence. Linguistics, 48 (1), 1-48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Crop Protection Compendium (2008). Acacia confusa. online, accessed 18-04-2011. <http://www.cabi.org>Google Scholar

  • Currie, T.E., Greenhill, S.J., Gray, R.D., Hasegawa, T., & Mace, R. (2010). Rise and fall of political complexity in island south-east Asia and the Pacific. Nature, 467 (7317), 801-804.Google Scholar

  • Cysouw, M., Dediu, D., & Moran, S. (2012). Comment on “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa”. Science, 335 (6069), 657.Google Scholar

  • Dahl, O. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • de Boer, B. (2000). Self-organization in vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 28 (4), 441-465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeGraff, M. (2001). On the origin of creoles: A cartesian critique of“neo” darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology, 5, 213-311.Google Scholar

  • Diamond, J. & Bellwood, P. (2003). Farmers and their languages: The first expan­sions. Science, 300 (5619), 597-603.Google Scholar

  • Digiulio, D.V., Seidenberg, M., Oleary, D.S., & Raz, N. (1994). Procedural and de­clarative memory: A developmental study. Brain and Cognition, 25 (1), 79-91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dryer, M.S. (2011). Order of subject, object and verb. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 81). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar

  • Dunbar, R. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group-size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16 (4), 681-694.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, M., Greenhill, S.J., Levinson, S.C., & Gray, R.D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473 (7345), 79-82.Google Scholar

  • Eubank, L. & Gregg, K. (1999). Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: Divide et impera. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 65-99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

  • Fagyal, Z., Escobar, A., Swarup, S., Gasser, L., & Lakkaraju, K. (2010). Centers and peripheries: Network roles in language change. Lingua, 120 (8), 2061-2079.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferdinand, V. & Zuidema, W. (2009). Thomas’ Theorem meets Bayes’ Rule: a model of the iterated learning of language. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceed­ings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society CogSci’09 (pp. 1786-1791). Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

  • Ferreira, F. (2005). Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review, 22, 365-380.Google Scholar

  • Fillmore, C.J. (1992). ‘Corpuslinguistics’ or ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Sym­posium 82, Stockholm (pp. 35-60). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Garrod, S. (2010). Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11, 33-50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gordon, R. (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (15th edition). Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar

  • Gray, R.D., Drummond, A.J., & Greenhill, S.J. (2009). Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in pacific settlement. Science, 323 (5913), 479-483.Google Scholar

  • Gray, R.D., Greenhill, S.J., & Ross, R.M. (2007). The pleasures and perils of darwin- izing culture (with phylogenies). Biological Theory, 2 (4), 360-375.Google Scholar

  • Greenberg, J.H. (1963). Universals of language: report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13-15, 1961. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar

  • Greenhill, S.J., Currie, T.E., & Gray, R.D. (2009). Does horizontal transmission in­validate cultural phylogenies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276 (1665), 2299-2306.Google Scholar

  • Griffiths, T., Christian, B., & Kalish, M. (2010). Using category structures to test iterated learning as a method for identifying inductive biases. Cognitive Sci­ence, 32 (1), 68-107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartshorne, J. & Ullman, M. (2006). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Devel­opmental Science, 9 (1), 21-32.Google Scholar

  • Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M.S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (2008). World Atlas of Language Structures, volume Available online at <http://wals.info/feature/22>. Accessed on 2011-04-18. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar

  • Hawks, J. (2008). From genes to numbers: effective population sizes in human evolution. In J.-P. Bocquet-Appel (Ed.), Recent advances in palaeodemography: Data, techniques, patterns (pp. 9-30). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Hay, J. & Bauer, L. (2007). Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, 2, 388-400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The tasmanian case. American An­tiquity, 69 (2), 197-214.Google Scholar

  • Hunley, K., Bowern, C., Healy, M., Hunley, K., Bowern, C., & Healy, M. (2012). Re­jection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279 (1736), 2281-2288.Google Scholar

  • Hurford, J.R. (1991). The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition, 40 (3), 159-201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • International Monetary Fund. Online (2011). World economic outlook, April 2011.Google Scholar

  • Isbell, L.A. & Young, T. (1996). The evolution of bipedalism in hominids and reduced group size in chimpanzees: Alternative responses to decreasing resource avail­ability. Journal of Human Evolution, 30, 389-397(9).CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jaeger, T., Graff, P., Croft, W., & Pontillo, D. (2011). Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology, 15, 281.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, J. & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive psychology, 21 (1), 60-99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaestle, F.A. & Smith, D.G. (2001). Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence for prehistoric population movement: the numic expansion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115 (1), 1-12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kay, P. & Maffi, L. (2008). Number of basic colour categories. In M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 133). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar

  • Kay, P. & Regier, T. (2003). Resolving the question of color naming universals. Pro­ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 9085-9089.Google Scholar

  • Kellerman, E. & Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.) (1986). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

  • Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (31), 10681-10686.Google Scholar

  • Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T.L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolu­tion of language. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 104 (12), 5241-5245.Google Scholar

  • Kirby, S. & Hurford, J. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121-148). London: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

  • Kuhl, P.K., Andruski, J.E., Chistovich, I.A., Chistovich, L.A., Kozhevnikova, E.V., Ryskina, V.L., Stolyarova, E.I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277 (5326), 684-686.Google Scholar

  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Lee, S. & Hasegawa, T. (2011). Bayesian phylogenetic analysis supports an agricul­tural origin of Japonic languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278 (1725), 3662-3669.Google Scholar

  • Levinson, S. (2006). Introduction: The evolution of culture in a microcosm. In S.C. Levinson & P. Jaisson (Eds.), Evolution and culture: A Fyssen Foundation Sym­posium (pp. 1-41). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (3), 251-285.Google Scholar

  • Lupyan, G. & Dale, R. (2010). Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5 (1), e8559.Google Scholar

  • Lycett, S. & Norton, C. (2010). A demographic model for palaeolithic technological evolution: the case of east asia and the movius line. Quaternary International, 211 (1), 55-65.Google Scholar

  • Lycett, S.J. (2009). Understanding ancient hominin dispersals using artefactual data: a phylogeographic analysis of acheulean handaxes. PLoS One, 4 (10), e7404.Google Scholar

  • Lycett, S.J., Collard, M., & McGrew, W.C. (2009). Cladistic analyses of behavioural variation in wild pan troglodytes: exploring the chimpanzee culture hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 57 (4), 337-349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKeigan, T. & Muth, S.Q. (2006). A grammatical network of Tzotzil Mayan colour terms. In C.P. Biggam & C.J. Kay (Eds.), Progress in Colour Studies. Volume I: Language and culture (pp. 23-36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Maddieson, I. (2008). Tone. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 13). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar

  • Matisoff, J. (1978). Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘organic’ approach to linguistic comparison. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar

  • McPherson, J.M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homoph- ily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McWhorter, J. (2008). Why Does a Language Undress? Strange Cases in Indonesia. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemaki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 167-190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Mesoudi, A. & Whiten, A. (2008). The multiple roles of cultural transmission experi­ments in understanding human cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3489-3501.Google Scholar

  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K.N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29 (4), 329-47; discussion 347-383.Google Scholar

  • Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1985). Authority in language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

  • Nerbonne, J. (2010). Measuring the diffusion of linguistic change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365 (1559), 3821-3828.Google Scholar

  • Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nettle, D. & Dunbar, R.I.M. (1997). Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology, 38 (1), 93-99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Newman, M.E.J. & Park, J. (2003). Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Physical Review E, 68 (3), 036122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins..Google Scholar

  • Pericliev, V. (2004). There is no correlation between the size of a community speak­ing a language and the size of the phonological inventory of that language. Linguistic Typology, 8, 376-383.Google Scholar

  • Quillinan, J., Kirby, S., & Smith., K. (2010). Co-evolution of language and social net­work structure through cultural transmission. In A.D. Smith, M. Shouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Evolution of Language EVOLANG 8 (pp. 475-476). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Reali, F. & Griffiths, T. (2009). The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111 (3), 317-328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richerson, P.J., Boyd, R., & Bettinger, R.L. (2009). Cultural innovations and demo­graphic change. Human Biology, 81 (2-3), 211-235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, G. (2010). An experimental study of social selection and frequency of interaction in linguistic diversity. Interaction Studies, 11 (1), 138-159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, S. & Winters, J. (2012). Constructing knowledge: Nomothetic approaches to language evolution. In L. McCrohon, T. Fujimura, K. Fujita, R. Martin, K. Okanoya, R. Suzuki, & N. Yusa (Eds.), Five approaches to language evolu­tion: Proceedings of the Workshops of the 9th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 148-157). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Sapir, E. (1912). Language and environment. American Anthropologist, 14 (2), 226-242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24 (2), 205-214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scott-Phillips, T.C. & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (9), 411-417.Google Scholar

  • Seguy, J. (1973). La dialectom'etrie dans l’atlas linguistique de gascogne. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 37 (145), 1-24.Google Scholar

  • Shennan, S. (2000). Population, culture history and the dynamics of culture change. Current Anthropology, 41, 811-835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, C. & Smith, D. (2003). Ingestion of ethanol just prior to sleep onset impairs memory for procedural but not declarative tasks. Sleep, 15 (26), 185-191.Google Scholar

  • Smith, K. & Kirby, S. (2008). Cultural evolution: implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1509), 3591-3603.Google Scholar

  • Smith, K. & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition, 116 (3), 444-449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., Roberts, S., & Kirby, S. (2012). The effect of generation turnover and intelocutor negotiation on linguistic structure. In T.C. Phillips, M. Tamariz, E.A. Cartmill, & J.R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference EVOLANG9 (pp. 555-556). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, P. (2004). Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology, 8, 305-320.Google Scholar

  • Trudgill, P. (2011). Social structure and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology, 15, 155-160.Google Scholar

  • Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acqui­sition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141-178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

  • Vogt, P. (2009). Modelling interactions between language evolution and demography. Human Biology, 81 (2-3), 237-258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wasow, T. & Arnold, J. (2005). Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua, 115, 1481-1496.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. W.P. Lehmann, Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 97-195). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Welsch, R.L., Terrell, J., & Nadolski, J.A. (1992). Language and culture on the north coast of new guinea. American Anthropologist, 94 (3), 568-600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wichmann, S. & Holman, E.W. (2009). Population size and rates of language change. Human Biology, 81 (2-3), 259-74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wichmann, S., Rama, T., & Holman, E. (2011). Phonological diversity, word length, and population sizes across languages: The ASJP evidence. Linguistic Typology, 15, 177-197.Google Scholar

  • Wikipedia (2011). List of flags by number of colors. online, accessed 12-04-2011. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list> of flags by number of colors.Google Scholar

  • Winters, J. (2010). Phoneme inventory size and demography. In Proceedings of the 24th Language at Edinburgh Lunch, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

  • World Values Survey Association (2009). World Values Survey 1981-2008 Official Aggregate v. 20090901. Madrid: ASEP/JDS.Google Scholar

  • Wray, A. & Grace, G.W. (2007). The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolu­tionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117, 543-578.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-12-28

Published in Print: 2012-12-01


Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, ISSN (Online) 2083-8506, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6.

Export Citation

© 2013. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Alberto Acerbi, Jeremy Kendal, and Jamshid J. Tehrani
Evolution and Human Behavior, 2017, Volume 38, Number 4, Page 474
[2]
Christian Bentz, Annemarie Verkerk, Douwe Kiela, Felix Hill, Paula Buttery, and Mark Aronoff
PLOS ONE, 2015, Volume 10, Number 6, Page e0128254
[3]
Seán Roberts, James Winters, and Frank Emmert-Streib
PLoS ONE, 2013, Volume 8, Number 8, Page e70902
[4]
Christine Cuskley, Francesca Colaiori, Claudio Castellano, Vittorio Loreto, Martina Pugliese, and Francesca Tria
Journal of Memory and Language, 2015, Volume 84, Page 205
[5]
Seán G. Roberts, James Winters, Keith Chen, and Ramesh Balasubramaniam
PLOS ONE, 2015, Volume 10, Number 7, Page e0132145
[6]
Claire Bowern, Hannah Haynie, Catherine Sheard, Barry Alpher, Patience Epps, Jane Hill, and Patrick McConvell
Journal of Ethnobiology, 2014, Volume 34, Number 2, Page 195
[7]
Kaius Sinnemäki
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2014, Volume 5, Number 4, Page 477
[8]
D. Robert Ladd, Seán G. Roberts, and Dan Dediu
Annual Review of Linguistics, 2015, Volume 1, Number 1, Page 221

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in