Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Psychology of Language and Communication

The Journal of University of Warsaw

3 Issues per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.241

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
In This Section

Social Structure and Language Structure: the New Nomothetic Approach

Seán Roberts
  • Corresponding author
  • Language Evolution and Computation Research Unit, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Dugald Stewart Building, 3 Charles Street Edinburgh, EH8 9AD
  • Email:
/ James Winters
  • Corresponding author
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Email:
Published Online: 2012-12-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6


Recent studies have taken advantage of newly available, large-scale, cross-linguistic data and new statistical techniques to look at the relationship between language structure and social structure. These ‘nomothetic’ approaches contrast with more traditional approaches and a tension is observed between proponents of each method. We review some nomothetic studies and point out some challenges that must be overcome. However, we argue that nomothetic approaches can contribute to our understanding of the links between social structure and language structure if they address these challenges and are taken as part of a body of mutually supporting evidence. Nomothetic studies are a powerful tool for generating hypotheses that can go on to be corroborated and tested with experimental and theoretical approaches. These studies are highlighting the effect of interaction on language.

Keywords : nomothetic; social structure; complex adaptive systems; linguistic niche hypothesis; cultural evolution

  • Atkinson, Q. (2011a). Linking spatial patterns of language variation to ancient demography and population migrations. Linguistic Typology, 15 (2), 321-332.

  • Atkinson, Q.D. (2011b). Phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science, 332 (6027), 346-349.

  • Atkinson, Q. (2012). Response to comments on phonemic diversity supports a serial founder effect model of language expansion from Africa. Science, 335 (6069), 657-657.

  • Atkinson, Q.D., Meade, A., Venditti, C., Greenhill, S.J., & Pagel, M. (2008). Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science, 319 (5863), 588.

  • Backhaus, J. & Junghanns, K. (2006). Daytime naps improve procedural motor memory. Sleep Medicine, 7, 508-512. [Crossref]

  • Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1-26. [Crossref]

  • Bialystok, E. & Miller, B. (1999). The problems of age in second-language acquisi­tion: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2 (2), 127-145.

  • Bickel, B. & Nichols, J. (2008). Inflectional synthesis of the verb. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 22). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

  • Birdsong, D. & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44 (2), 235-249.

  • Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.

  • Boguna, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., Diaz-Guilera, A., & Arenas, A. (2004). Models of social networks based on social distance attachment. Physical Review E, 70 (5), 056122. [Crossref]

  • Bornstein, M. (1973). Color vision and color naming: A psychophysiological hy­pothesis of cultural difference. Psychological Bulletin, 80 (4), 257-285. [Crossref]

  • Bresnan, J. (2007). Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In S. Featherston & W. Sternefeld (Eds.), Roots: Lin­guistics in search of its evidential base (pp. 75-96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Burkett, D. & Griffiths, T. (2010). Iterated learning of multiple languages from multiple teachers. In A. Smith, M. Schouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference EVO- LANG 8 (pp. 58-65). Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Bybee, J. (2011). How plausible is the hypothesis that population size and dispersal are related to phoneme inventory size? introducing and commenting on a debate. Linguistic Typology, 15 (2), 147-153.

  • Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2005). The evolutionary origin of morphology. In M. Taller- man (Ed.), Language origins: Perspectives on evolution (pp. 166-184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Central Intelligence Agency (2009). Sex Ratio. In The World Factbook 2009. Wash­ington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.

  • Chambers, J.K. (1995). Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

  • Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.

  • Christiansen, M.H. & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31 (5), 489-508; discussion 509-58.

  • Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and non-native language processing. Language Learning, 60 (1), 21-43. [Crossref]

  • Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

  • Croft, W. (2010). The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experi­ence. Linguistics, 48 (1), 1-48. [Crossref]

  • Crop Protection Compendium (2008). Acacia confusa. online, accessed 18-04-2011. <http://www.cabi.org>

  • Currie, T.E., Greenhill, S.J., Gray, R.D., Hasegawa, T., & Mace, R. (2010). Rise and fall of political complexity in island south-east Asia and the Pacific. Nature, 467 (7317), 801-804.

  • Cysouw, M., Dediu, D., & Moran, S. (2012). Comment on “Phonemic Diversity Supports a Serial Founder Effect Model of Language Expansion from Africa”. Science, 335 (6069), 657.

  • Dahl, O. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • de Boer, B. (2000). Self-organization in vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 28 (4), 441-465. [Crossref]

  • DeGraff, M. (2001). On the origin of creoles: A cartesian critique of“neo” darwinian linguistics. Linguistic Typology, 5, 213-311.

  • Diamond, J. & Bellwood, P. (2003). Farmers and their languages: The first expan­sions. Science, 300 (5619), 597-603.

  • Digiulio, D.V., Seidenberg, M., Oleary, D.S., & Raz, N. (1994). Procedural and de­clarative memory: A developmental study. Brain and Cognition, 25 (1), 79-91. [Crossref]

  • Dryer, M.S. (2011). Order of subject, object and verb. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 81). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

  • Dunbar, R. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group-size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16 (4), 681-694. [Crossref]

  • Dunn, M., Greenhill, S.J., Levinson, S.C., & Gray, R.D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473 (7345), 79-82.

  • Eubank, L. & Gregg, K. (1999). Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: Divide et impera. In D. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 65-99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Fagyal, Z., Escobar, A., Swarup, S., Gasser, L., & Lakkaraju, K. (2010). Centers and peripheries: Network roles in language change. Lingua, 120 (8), 2061-2079. [Crossref]

  • Ferdinand, V. & Zuidema, W. (2009). Thomas’ Theorem meets Bayes’ Rule: a model of the iterated learning of language. In N. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceed­ings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society CogSci’09 (pp. 1786-1791). Wheat Ridge, CO: Cognitive Science Society.

  • Ferreira, F. (2005). Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review, 22, 365-380.

  • Fillmore, C.J. (1992). ‘Corpuslinguistics’ or ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Sym­posium 82, Stockholm (pp. 35-60). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Garrod, S. (2010). Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11, 33-50. [Crossref]

  • Gordon, R. (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (15th edition). Dallas: SIL International.

  • Gray, R.D., Drummond, A.J., & Greenhill, S.J. (2009). Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in pacific settlement. Science, 323 (5913), 479-483.

  • Gray, R.D., Greenhill, S.J., & Ross, R.M. (2007). The pleasures and perils of darwin- izing culture (with phylogenies). Biological Theory, 2 (4), 360-375.

  • Greenberg, J.H. (1963). Universals of language: report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13-15, 1961. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.

  • Greenhill, S.J., Currie, T.E., & Gray, R.D. (2009). Does horizontal transmission in­validate cultural phylogenies? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276 (1665), 2299-2306.

  • Griffiths, T., Christian, B., & Kalish, M. (2010). Using category structures to test iterated learning as a method for identifying inductive biases. Cognitive Sci­ence, 32 (1), 68-107. [Crossref]

  • Hartshorne, J. & Ullman, M. (2006). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Devel­opmental Science, 9 (1), 21-32.

  • Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M.S., Gil, D., & Comrie, B. (2008). World Atlas of Language Structures, volume Available online at <http://wals.info/feature/22>. Accessed on 2011-04-18. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

  • Hawks, J. (2008). From genes to numbers: effective population sizes in human evolution. In J.-P. Bocquet-Appel (Ed.), Recent advances in palaeodemography: Data, techniques, patterns (pp. 9-30). Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Hay, J. & Bauer, L. (2007). Phoneme inventory size and population size. Language, 2, 388-400. [Crossref]

  • Henrich, J. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The tasmanian case. American An­tiquity, 69 (2), 197-214.

  • Hunley, K., Bowern, C., Healy, M., Hunley, K., Bowern, C., & Healy, M. (2012). Re­jection of a serial founder effects model of genetic and linguistic coevolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279 (1736), 2281-2288.

  • Hurford, J.R. (1991). The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition. Cognition, 40 (3), 159-201. [Crossref]

  • Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539-588). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • International Monetary Fund. Online (2011). World economic outlook, April 2011.

  • Isbell, L.A. & Young, T. (1996). The evolution of bipedalism in hominids and reduced group size in chimpanzees: Alternative responses to decreasing resource avail­ability. Journal of Human Evolution, 30, 389-397(9). [Crossref]

  • Jaeger, T., Graff, P., Croft, W., & Pontillo, D. (2011). Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology, 15, 281.

  • Johnson, J. & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive psychology, 21 (1), 60-99. [Crossref]

  • Kaestle, F.A. & Smith, D.G. (2001). Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence for prehistoric population movement: the numic expansion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115 (1), 1-12. [Crossref]

  • Kay, P. & Maffi, L. (2008). Number of basic colour categories. In M. Haspelmath, M.S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 133). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

  • Kay, P. & Regier, T. (2003). Resolving the question of color naming universals. Pro­ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 9085-9089.

  • Kellerman, E. & Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.) (1986). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (31), 10681-10686.

  • Kirby, S., Dowman, M., & Griffiths, T.L. (2007). Innateness and culture in the evolu­tion of language. Proceedings of the National Academy ofSciences of the United States of America, 104 (12), 5241-5245.

  • Kirby, S. & Hurford, J. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. In A. Cangelosi & D. Parisi (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121-148). London: Springer.

  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

  • Kuhl, P.K., Andruski, J.E., Chistovich, I.A., Chistovich, L.A., Kozhevnikova, E.V., Ryskina, V.L., Stolyarova, E.I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277 (5326), 684-686.

  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Lee, S. & Hasegawa, T. (2011). Bayesian phylogenetic analysis supports an agricul­tural origin of Japonic languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278 (1725), 3662-3669.

  • Levinson, S. (2006). Introduction: The evolution of culture in a microcosm. In S.C. Levinson & P. Jaisson (Eds.), Evolution and culture: A Fyssen Foundation Sym­posium (pp. 1-41). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12 (3), 251-285.

  • Lupyan, G. & Dale, R. (2010). Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5 (1), e8559.

  • Lycett, S. & Norton, C. (2010). A demographic model for palaeolithic technological evolution: the case of east asia and the movius line. Quaternary International, 211 (1), 55-65.

  • Lycett, S.J. (2009). Understanding ancient hominin dispersals using artefactual data: a phylogeographic analysis of acheulean handaxes. PLoS One, 4 (10), e7404.

  • Lycett, S.J., Collard, M., & McGrew, W.C. (2009). Cladistic analyses of behavioural variation in wild pan troglodytes: exploring the chimpanzee culture hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 57 (4), 337-349. [Crossref]

  • MacKeigan, T. & Muth, S.Q. (2006). A grammatical network of Tzotzil Mayan colour terms. In C.P. Biggam & C.J. Kay (Eds.), Progress in Colour Studies. Volume I: Language and culture (pp. 23-36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Maddieson, I. (2008). Tone. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (chapter 13). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.

  • Matisoff, J. (1978). Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘organic’ approach to linguistic comparison. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.

  • McPherson, J.M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homoph- ily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. [Crossref]

  • McWhorter, J. (2008). Why Does a Language Undress? Strange Cases in Indonesia. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemaki, & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 167-190). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Mesoudi, A. & Whiten, A. (2008). The multiple roles of cultural transmission experi­ments in understanding human cultural evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 3489-3501.

  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K.N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29 (4), 329-47; discussion 347-383.

  • Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1985). Authority in language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Nerbonne, J. (2010). Measuring the diffusion of linguistic change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365 (1559), 3821-3828.

  • Nettle, D. (1999). Linguistic diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nettle, D. & Dunbar, R.I.M. (1997). Social markers and the evolution of reciprocal exchange. Current Anthropology, 38 (1), 93-99. [Crossref]

  • Newman, M.E.J. & Park, J. (2003). Why social networks are different from other types of networks. Physical Review E, 68 (3), 036122. [Crossref]

  • Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins..

  • Pericliev, V. (2004). There is no correlation between the size of a community speak­ing a language and the size of the phonological inventory of that language. Linguistic Typology, 8, 376-383.

  • Quillinan, J., Kirby, S., & Smith., K. (2010). Co-evolution of language and social net­work structure through cultural transmission. In A.D. Smith, M. Shouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Evolution of Language EVOLANG 8 (pp. 475-476). Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Reali, F. & Griffiths, T. (2009). The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111 (3), 317-328. [Crossref]

  • Richerson, P.J., Boyd, R., & Bettinger, R.L. (2009). Cultural innovations and demo­graphic change. Human Biology, 81 (2-3), 211-235. [Crossref]

  • Roberts, G. (2010). An experimental study of social selection and frequency of interaction in linguistic diversity. Interaction Studies, 11 (1), 138-159. [Crossref]

  • Roberts, S. & Winters, J. (2012). Constructing knowledge: Nomothetic approaches to language evolution. In L. McCrohon, T. Fujimura, K. Fujita, R. Martin, K. Okanoya, R. Suzuki, & N. Yusa (Eds.), Five approaches to language evolu­tion: Proceedings of the Workshops of the 9th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 148-157). Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Sapir, E. (1912). Language and environment. American Anthropologist, 14 (2), 226-242. [Crossref]

  • Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24 (2), 205-214. [Crossref]

  • Scott-Phillips, T.C. & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (9), 411-417.

  • Seguy, J. (1973). La dialectom'etrie dans l’atlas linguistique de gascogne. Revue de Linguistique Romane, 37 (145), 1-24.

  • Shennan, S. (2000). Population, culture history and the dynamics of culture change. Current Anthropology, 41, 811-835. [Crossref]

  • Smith, C. & Smith, D. (2003). Ingestion of ethanol just prior to sleep onset impairs memory for procedural but not declarative tasks. Sleep, 15 (26), 185-191.

  • Smith, K. & Kirby, S. (2008). Cultural evolution: implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363 (1509), 3591-3603.

  • Smith, K. & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition, 116 (3), 444-449. [Crossref]

  • Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., Roberts, S., & Kirby, S. (2012). The effect of generation turnover and intelocutor negotiation on linguistic structure. In T.C. Phillips, M. Tamariz, E.A. Cartmill, & J.R. Hurford (Eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference EVOLANG9 (pp. 555-556). Singapore: World Scientific.

  • Trudgill, P. (1974). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Trudgill, P. (2004). Linguistic and social typology: The Austronesian migrations and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology, 8, 305-320.

  • Trudgill, P. (2011). Social structure and phoneme inventories. Linguistic Typology, 15, 155-160.

  • Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acqui­sition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141-178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

  • Vogt, P. (2009). Modelling interactions between language evolution and demography. Human Biology, 81 (2-3), 237-258. [Crossref]

  • Wasow, T. & Arnold, J. (2005). Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua, 115, 1481-1496. [Crossref]

  • Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. W.P. Lehmann, Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium (pp. 97-195). Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Welsch, R.L., Terrell, J., & Nadolski, J.A. (1992). Language and culture on the north coast of new guinea. American Anthropologist, 94 (3), 568-600. [Crossref]

  • Wichmann, S. & Holman, E.W. (2009). Population size and rates of language change. Human Biology, 81 (2-3), 259-74. [Crossref]

  • Wichmann, S., Rama, T., & Holman, E. (2011). Phonological diversity, word length, and population sizes across languages: The ASJP evidence. Linguistic Typology, 15, 177-197.

  • Wikipedia (2011). List of flags by number of colors. online, accessed 12-04-2011. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/list> of flags by number of colors.

  • Winters, J. (2010). Phoneme inventory size and demography. In Proceedings of the 24th Language at Edinburgh Lunch, Edinburgh.

  • World Values Survey Association (2009). World Values Survey 1981-2008 Official Aggregate v. 20090901. Madrid: ASEP/JDS.

  • Wray, A. & Grace, G.W. (2007). The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolu­tionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117, 543-578. [Crossref]

About the article

Published Online: 2012-12-28

Published in Print: 2012-12-01

Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, ISSN (Online) 2083-8506, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0008-6. Export Citation

© 2013. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in