Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

1 Issue per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Human Honest Signalling and Nonverbal Communication

Sławomir Wacewicz
  • English Department, Centre for Language Evolution Studies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Władysława Bojarskiego 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Przemysław Żywiczyński
Published Online: 2012-12-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0009-5


The issue of signal reliability (‘honesty’) is widely recognised in language evolution research as one of the most fundamental problems concerning the evolutionary emergence of protolanguage, i.e. early language-like communication. We propose that nonverbal communication is likely to have played an important but underestimated role in language evolution: not directly in the transfer of message contents, but rather in stabilising the emerging protolanguage. We single out one subset of nonverbal cues - nonvocal nonverbal paralinguistic adaptors (NNPAs) - based on their role as indicators of reliability in present-day communication of humans. We suggest that the relatively involuntary and therefore reliable NNPAs might have served to stabilise more volitionally controlled, and therefore less reliable, verbal communication at the initial, bootstrapping stages of its phylogenetic development.

Keywords : communication; language evolution; protolanguage; honest signaling; nonverbal communication; baseline demeanor; signal; cue; ritualization; deception

  • Abercrombie, D. (1972). Paralanguage. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Commu­nication in face to face interaction (pp. 64-70). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1972). Eye contact, distance and affiliation. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face to face interaction (pp. 301-316). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communica­tion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

  • Buhler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar

  • Christiansen, M. & Kirby, S. (2003). Language evolution: The hardest problem in science? In M. Christiansen & S. Kirby (Eds.), Language evolution (pp. 1-15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature, 462, 51-57.Google Scholar

  • Cody, M.J. & O’Hair, H.D. (1983). Nonverbal communication and deception; dif­ferences in deception cues due to gender and communicator dominance. Com­munication Monographs, 50, 175-192.Google Scholar

  • Cowley, S.J. (2011). Distributed language. In S.J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Uni­versity Press.Google Scholar

  • Druckman, M., Rozelle, R.M., & Baxter, J. C. (1982). Nonverbal communication: Survey, theory, and research. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

  • Dusenbery, D.B. (1992). Sensory ecology: How organisms acquire and respond to information. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

  • Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and mar­riage. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar

  • Ekman P. & Freisen, W. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychia­try, 32, 88-106.Google Scholar

  • Ekman P. & Freisen, W. (1972). Hand movements. Journal ofCommunication, 22, 353-374.Google Scholar

  • Exeline, R.V., Thibaut, J., Hickey, C.B., & Gumpert, P. (1970). Visual interaction in relation to Machiavellianism and an unethical act. In R. Christie & F.L. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism (pp. 53-75). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Feyereisen, P. (1991). Brain pathology, lateralization, and nonverbal behaviour. In R.S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 31-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fitch, T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Foster, J. & Slayton, M. (2010). Deception, tells, and the evolution of combinato­rial communication. In A.D.M. Smith, M. Shouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Evolution of Language EVOLANG 8 (pp. 405-406). New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Givens, D. (2012). Nonverbal dictionary. <http://center-for-nonverbal-studies>. org/6101.html, DOA 12/10/2012.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychol­ogy Press, a subsidiary of Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • Green, M. (2009). Speech acts, the handicap principle and the expression of psy­chological states. Mind and Language, 24 (2),139-163.Google Scholar

  • Grice, H.P. [1975] (1999). Logic and conversation. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 66-77). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Hailman, J.P. (1977). Optical signals: Animal communication and light. Blooming­ton: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hale, J.L. & Stiff, J.B. (1990). Nonverbal primacy in veracity judgements. Commu­nication Reports, 3, 383-396.Google Scholar

  • Hall, E.T. (1972). A System for the notation of proxemic behavior. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face to face interaction (pp. 247-273). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Hauser, M.D. (1997). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Hockett, C.F. (1973). Man’s place in nature. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Hocking, J.E. & Leathers, D.G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception. A new theoretical perspective. Psychological Reports, 51, 119-131.Google Scholar

  • Jakobson, R. [1960] (1999). Linguistics and poetics. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 48-54). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1990). Introduction: What is communication? In D.H. Mellor (Ed.), Ways of communicating (pp. 1-13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of language: Constraints on hypotheses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kimura, D. (1993). Neuromotor mechanisms in human communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Knapp, M.L. & Comandena, M.E. (1979). Telling it like it isn’t: A review of theory and research on deception communications. Human Communication Research, 5, 270-285.Google Scholar

  • Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. (1993). Introduction to behavioural ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Krebs, J.R. & Dawkins, R. (1984). Animal signals: Mind-reading and manipulation. In J.R. Krebs & R. Dawkins (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary ap­proach (pp. 380-402). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Lachmann, M., Szamadó, S., & Bergstrom, C.T. (2001). Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language. PNAS, 98 (23), 13189-13194.Google Scholar

  • Laver, J. & Hutcheson, S. (1972). Communication in face to face interaction. Har- mondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Leathers, D.G. [1997] (2007). Komunikacja niewerbalna [Successful nonverbal com­munication]. Trans. into Polish by M. Trzcińska. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar

  • Lindblom, B. (1990). On the communication process: Speaker-listener interaction and the develop- ment of speech. In K. Fraurud & U. Sundberg (Eds.), AAC augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 220-230). London: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. 2004. Defining deception. Anales de Psicologia, 20 (1), 147-171.Google Scholar

  • Maynard Smith, J. & Harper, D. (2003). Animal signals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Ohala, J.J. (1994). The frequency codes underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J.J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 325­347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..Google Scholar

  • O’Hair, H.D., Cody, M.J., & McLaughlin, M.L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication. Human Communica­tion Research, 7, 325-339.Google Scholar

  • Owren, M.J., Rendall, D., & Ryan, M.J. (2010). Redefining animal signaling: Influ­ence versus information in communication. Biology & Philosophy, 25/5, 755-780.Google Scholar

  • Pease, A. (1981). Body language: How to read other’s thoughts by their gestures. London: Sheldon Press.Google Scholar

  • Scheflen, A. (1972). The significance of posture in communication systems. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face to face interaction (pp. 225-246). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Scott-Phillips, T. (2008). On the correct application of animal signalling theory to human communication. In A.D.M. Smith, K. Smith, & R. Ferrer i Cancho (Eds.),Google Scholar

  • Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (pp. 275-282). New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Senghas, A., Kita, S., & Ozyurek, A. (2004). Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science, 305 (5691), 1779-1782.Google Scholar

  • Seyfarth, R. & Cheney, D. (2003). Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 145-173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

  • Slocombe, K.E., Waller, B.M., & Liebal, K. (2011). The language void: the need for multimodality in primate communication research. Animal Behaviour, 81 (5), 919-924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). The origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Wacewicz, S. & Zywiczynski, P. (2010). The relevance of body language to evolution of language research. In A.D.M. Smith, M. Shouwstra, B. de Boer, & K. Smith (Eds.), Evolution of language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Evolution of Language EVOLANG 8 (pp. 515-516). New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B.M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal com­munication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14 (pp. 1-60). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

  • Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2012-12-28

Published in Print: 2012-12-01

Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 113–130, ISSN (Online) 2083-8506, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-012-0009-5.

Export Citation

© 2013. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Sławomir Wacewicz, Przemysław Żywiczyński, and Alessandra Chiera
Language Sciences, 2017, Volume 63, Page 91

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in