Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2083-8506
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Irony as a Means of Perception Through Communication Channels. Emotions, Attitude and IQ Related to Irony Across Gender

Anna Milanowicz
Published Online: 2013-09-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0008

Abstract

The paper explores why certain adults are, or at least consider themselves to be, more ironic than others. The study looked at comprehension and application of irony compared to subjective affective evaluation of irony reported by Polish-speaking adults and with relation to nonverbal intelligence measured with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised-Polish versions (WAIS-R(PL), 2004). Fifty-four subjects aged 20-66 years (28 females and 26 males) participated in Study 1 on subjective perception of irony. The comprehension, emotional valence and social functions of ironic meanings as well as the degree to which subjects perceived themselves as ironic were assessed through a self-report questionnaire. Inter-correlations were performed and related to the performance quotient (IQ) which was measured in Study 2, where 45 (24 females and 21 males) out of the 54 participants were tested with performance subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised-Polish versions (WAIS-R(PL), 2004). The nonverbal intelligence scale was administered. Performance on nonverbal intelligence tests is not limited by language abilities and its analysis and can be considered important for future cultural comparative studies. Subjects who perceived themselves as ironic showed a higher nonverbal IQ in comparison to subjects who described themselves as non-ironic or barely ironic. The pragmatic qualities of irony were analyzed for their affective valuation and balanced for gender. Individual differences and gender effects in the perception of the social functions of ironic utterances were found. The paper describes the implicit emotional layer conveyed in irony and its importance in irony processing and comprehension.

Keywords: irony; irony comprehension; emotions; attitude; IQ; gender

  • Allport, G. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar

  • Barbe, K. (1995). Irony in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Blakemore, D. (1992). Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Bromberek-Dyzman, K. (2012). Affective twist in irony processing. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 23, 83-111.Google Scholar

  • Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Brownell, H.H., Jacobs, J.R., Gardner, H., & Gianoulis, D. (1990). Conditions for sarcasm. Unpublished paper from the Boston University Aphasia ResearchCenter and Harvard Project Zero.Google Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J.T. & Bernston, G.G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 401-423.Google Scholar

  • Chorpita, B.F., Albano, A.M., & Barlow, D.H. (1996). Cognitive processing in children: Relation to anxiety and family influences. Journal of Clinical ChildPsychology, 25, 170-176.Google Scholar

  • Clark, H. & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: General, 113, 121-126.Google Scholar

  • Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain.New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

  • Dews, S., Kaplan, J. & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social function of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347-367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dews, S. & Winner, E. (1995). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 3-19.Google Scholar

  • Dews, S., Winner, E., Kaplan, J., Rosenblatt, E., Hunt, M., Lim, K., McGovern, A., Qualter, A., & Smarsh, B. (1996). Children’s understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development, 67, 3071-3085.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Belmont: Thomson and Wadsworth.Google Scholar

  • Frye, N. (1957). Anathomy of Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs Jr., R.W. & Colston, H.L. (2007). Irony in Language and Thought. A CognitiveScience Reader. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs Jr., R.W. & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16, 523-530.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glenwright, M.R. & Pexman, P.M. (2010). Development of children’s ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language, 37, 429-451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glenwright, M.P. & Pexman, P.M. (2008). Children’s perception of the verbal functions of irony. In R.W. Gibbs Jr. & H.L. Colston (2008). Irony in Languageand Thought. A Cognitive Science Reader (pp. 447-464). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19, 239-264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntaxand Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Hamamoto, H. (1998). Irony from a cognitive perspective. In Robyn Carston and Seiji Uchida (Eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications (pp. 257-270). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Householder, F.W. (1971). Lingusitic Speculations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental SocialPsychology, 36, 660-676.Google Scholar

  • Ito, T.A. & Cacioppo, J.T. (2001). Affect and attitudes: A social neuroscience approach. In J.P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition (pp. 50-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Ito, T.A. & Cacioppo, J.T. (2005). Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias. Cognition and Emotion, 19 (1), 1-26CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ivanko, S.L., Pexman, P.M., & Olineck, K.M. (2004). How sarcastic are you? Individual differences and verbal irony. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 23, 244-271.Google Scholar

  • Jorgensen, J.C. (1996). The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal ofPragmatics, 26, 613-634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreuz, R.J., Long, D.L., & Church, M.B. (1991), On being ironic: Pragmatic and mnemonic implications. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 6, 149-162.Google Scholar

  • Kreuz, R. & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 374-386.Google Scholar

  • Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal ofExperimental Psychology: General, 124, 3-21.Google Scholar

  • Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

  • Mewhort-Buist, T.A. & Nilsen, E.S. (2013). What are you really saying? Associations between shyness and verbal irony comprehension. Infant and ChildDevelopment, 22, 2, 180-197.Google Scholar

  • Muecke, D. (1970). Irony and the Ironic. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

  • Pexman, P.M. & Olineck, K.M. (2002). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 33, 199-217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Recchia, H.E., Howe, N., Ross, H.S., & Alexander, S. (2010). Children’s understanding and production of verbal irony in family conversations. British Journalof Developmental Psychology, 28, 255-274.Google Scholar

  • Roberts, R.M. & Kreuz, R.J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? PsychologicalScience, 5, 159-163.Google Scholar

  • Searle, J. (1979). Literal meaning. In J. Searle, Expression and Meaning (pp. 117-136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Seto, K.-I. (1998). On non-echoic irony. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), RelevanceTheory: Applications and Implications (pp. 239-255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 295-318). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1984). Pragmatics: An overview. In S. Georges (Ed.), From the Lingusistics to the Social Context (pp. 21-41). Bologna: Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1991). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In D. Steven (Ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader (pp. 550-564). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1998). Irony and relevance: A reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Applicationsand Implications (pp. 283-293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mindand Language, 17, 3-23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shuliang, M., Yanjie, S., Raymond, C.K., & Chanb, J.L. (2008). Comprehension of metaphor and irony in schizophrenia during remission: The role of theory of mind and IQ. Psychiatry Research, 157, 21-29.Google Scholar

  • Taghavi, R., Moradi, A.R., Neshat-Doost, H.T., Yule, W., & Dalgleish, T. (2000). Interpretation of ambiguous emotional information in clinically anxious children and adolescents. Cognition and Emotions, 14, 809-822.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thurstone, L. (1931). The Measurement of Social Attitudes. Journal of Abnormaland Social Psychology 27, 249-269.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral andBrain Sciences, 28 (5), 675-691.Google Scholar

  • Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Toplak, M. & Katz, A.N. (2000). On the uses of sarcastic irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1467-1488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53-76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yamanshi, M. (1998). Some issues in the treatment of irony and related tropes. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications (pp. 283-293). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-09-06

Published in Print: 2013-09-01


Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0008.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ivana Bianchi, Carla Canestrari, Anna Maria Roncoroni, Roberto Burro, Erika Branchini, and Ugo Savardi
HUMOR, 2017, Volume 30, Number 4
[2]
Magda Gucman
Psychology of Language and Communication, 2016, Volume 20, Number 3

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in