Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

1 Issue per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2083-8506
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Distinguishing facts from beliefs: fuzzy categories

Mitchell Rabinowitz / Maria Acevedo / Sara Casen / Myriah Rosengarten / Martha Kowalczyk / Lindsay Blau Portnoy
Published Online: 2013-12-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0016

Abstract

This paper presents results from five studies that investigate how people perceive the distinction between facts and beliefs. The central question being asked is whether the features that distinguish the categories of facts and beliefs are distinct or overlapping. In each of the five studies, participants are presented with content statements and asked the degree to which they agree with a given statement, the degree to which they think others would agree with it, and whether the statement was a fact or a belief. From these ratings, six possible patterns were derived. The results showed that in many content areas the patterns that describe the statements they categorized as facts and those that they categorized as beliefs had considerable overlap. In addition, participant consensus as to which statements were to be considered facts versus beliefs varied from high to low depending on the specific content being evaluated.

Keywords: concepts; categorization; naive conceptions

  • Banerjee, R., Yuill, N., Larson, C., Easton, K., Robinson, E., & Rowley, M. (2007). Children’s differentiation between beliefs about matters of fact and matters of opinion. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1084-1096.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, M.R. & Nagel, E. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

  • Collins, A.M. & Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 8, 240-247.Google Scholar

  • Dewey, J. & Bentley, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

  • Dewey, J. & Bento, J. (2009). Activating children’s thinking skills (ACTS): The effects of an infusion approach to teaching thinking in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 329-351.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • James, W. (2007). The meaning of truth. Radford, VA: Wilder Publications.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, M.K., Raye, C.L., Wang, A.,Y., & Taylor, T.H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 229-240.Google Scholar

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Gazzaniga, T.F. & Heatherton, T.F. (2006). Psychological science (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

  • Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121-123.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Goodwin, G.P. & Darley, J.M. (2012). Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 250-256.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Greene, J.D. & Paxton, J.M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106(30), 12506-12511.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Henretta, J., Brody, D., & Dumenil, L. (2006). America: A concise history (Vol. 2; 3rd. ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar

  • Marsh, E.J., Balota, D.A., & Roediger III, H.L. (2005). Learning facts from fiction: Effects of healthy aging and early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 19, 115-129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, E.J., Meade, M.L., & Roediger III, H.L. (2003). Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 519-536.Google Scholar

  • McCloskey, M.E. & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets. Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • New York State Education Department (2010). Curriculum Instruction and Instruction Technology. Retrieved 20.06.2010 from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/.Google Scholar

  • Nickerson, R.S., Perkins, D.N., & Smith, E.E. (1985), The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Perman, M. & Paterson, T. (1998). Major problems in the civil war and reconstruction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

  • Purves, W.K., Sadava, D., Orians, G.H., & Heller, C. (2001). Life, the Science of Biology: The Science of Biology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Rauch, J. (1993). Kindly inquisitors. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. (1940). An inquiry into meaning and truth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

  • Starmans, C. & Friedman, O. (2012). The folk conception of knowledge. Cognition, 124, 272-283.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Defining emotion concepts, Cognitive Science, 16, 539-581. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-31

Published in Print: 2013-12-01


Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0016.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Mitchell Rabinowitz, Lauren Latella, Chadly Stern, John T. Jost, and Niyaz Ahmed
PLOS ONE, 2016, Volume 11, Number 7, Page e0158382

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in