Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Psychology of Language and Communication

The Journal of University of Warsaw

3 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.192
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.241
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.313

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2083-8506
See all formats and pricing

Distinguishing facts from beliefs: fuzzy categories

Mitchell Rabinowitz
  • Corresponding author
  • Fordham University, New York
  • Email:
/ Maria Acevedo
  • Fordham University, New York
/ Sara Casen
  • Fordham University, New York
/ Myriah Rosengarten
  • Fordham University, New York
/ Martha Kowalczyk
  • Fordham University, New York
/ Lindsay Blau Portnoy
  • Fordham University, New York
Published Online: 2013-12-31 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0016

Abstract

This paper presents results from five studies that investigate how people perceive the distinction between facts and beliefs. The central question being asked is whether the features that distinguish the categories of facts and beliefs are distinct or overlapping. In each of the five studies, participants are presented with content statements and asked the degree to which they agree with a given statement, the degree to which they think others would agree with it, and whether the statement was a fact or a belief. From these ratings, six possible patterns were derived. The results showed that in many content areas the patterns that describe the statements they categorized as facts and those that they categorized as beliefs had considerable overlap. In addition, participant consensus as to which statements were to be considered facts versus beliefs varied from high to low depending on the specific content being evaluated.

Keywords: concepts; categorization; naive conceptions

  • Banerjee, R., Yuill, N., Larson, C., Easton, K., Robinson, E., & Rowley, M. (2007). Children’s differentiation between beliefs about matters of fact and matters of opinion. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1084-1096. [Crossref]

  • Cohen, M.R. & Nagel, E. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.

  • Collins, A.M. & Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 8, 240-247.

  • Dewey, J. & Bentley, A.F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

  • Dewey, J. & Bento, J. (2009). Activating children’s thinking skills (ACTS): The effects of an infusion approach to teaching thinking in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 329-351. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • James, W. (2007). The meaning of truth. Radford, VA: Wilder Publications.

  • Johnson, M.K., Raye, C.L., Wang, A.,Y., & Taylor, T.H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 229-240.

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Gazzaniga, T.F. & Heatherton, T.F. (2006). Psychological science (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Gettier, E.L. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23, 121-123. [Crossref] [Web of Science]

  • Goodwin, G.P. & Darley, J.M. (2012). Why are some moral beliefs perceived to be more objective than others? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 250-256. [Web of Science] [Crossref]

  • Greene, J.D. & Paxton, J.M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106(30), 12506-12511. [Web of Science]

  • Henretta, J., Brody, D., & Dumenil, L. (2006). America: A concise history (Vol. 2; 3rd. ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

  • Marsh, E.J., Balota, D.A., & Roediger III, H.L. (2005). Learning facts from fiction: Effects of healthy aging and early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 19, 115-129. [Crossref]

  • Marsh, E.J., Meade, M.L., & Roediger III, H.L. (2003). Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 519-536.

  • McCloskey, M.E. & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets. Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472. [Crossref]

  • New York State Education Department (2010). Curriculum Instruction and Instruction Technology. Retrieved 20.06.2010 from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/.

  • Nickerson, R.S., Perkins, D.N., & Smith, E.E. (1985), The teaching of thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Perman, M. & Paterson, T. (1998). Major problems in the civil war and reconstruction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Purves, W.K., Sadava, D., Orians, G.H., & Heller, C. (2001). Life, the Science of Biology: The Science of Biology. New York: Macmillan.

  • Rauch, J. (1993). Kindly inquisitors. University of Chicago Press.

  • Russell, B. (1940). An inquiry into meaning and truth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Starmans, C. & Friedman, O. (2012). The folk conception of knowledge. Cognition, 124, 272-283. [Web of Science] [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Defining emotion concepts, Cognitive Science, 16, 539-581. [Crossref]

About the article

Published Online: 2013-12-31

Published in Print: 2013-12-01


Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, ISSN (Print) 1234-2238, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0016. Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in