Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Psychology of Language and Communication

1 Issue per year

CiteScore 2016: 0.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.200
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.380

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Validity and Reliability of the Polish Adaptation of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test

Emilia Łojek / Joanna Stańczak / Agnieszka Wójcik / Bernice Marcopulos
Published Online: 2015-05-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2015-0005


Normative studies of the Polish adaptation of Th e Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) were conducted on 475 men and women aged 16-79, taking into consideration such factors as gender, education, and place of residence. Clinical studies were also performed on a group of patients with left -, right-, or bilateral hemispheric brain lesions, Parkinson’s disease, Huntingon’s disease, progressive obturational lung disease, dementia and depression. Th e results support the utility of the RFFT as a measure of executive functions. Th e validity and reliability indices of the Polish version of the test are similar to those reported by Ruff (1996). However, the sample Polish test performance differs notably from American samples performance and this difference is discussed.

Keywords: RFFT; Polish adaptation; validity; reliability


  • Anastasi, A. & Urbina, S. (1999). Testy psychologiczne (Psychological Tests). Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Berning, L.C., Weed, N.C., & Aloia, M.S. (1998). Interrater reliability of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Assessment, 5 (2), 181-186.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • Borkowski, J., Benton, A., & Spreen, O. (1967). Word fl uency and brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 5 (2), 135-140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, R.A. (1983). Verbal Concept Attainment Test: Cross-validation and validation of a booklet form. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39 (5), 743-745.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brzeziński, J. (1984). Wybrane zagadnienia z psychometrii i diagnostyki psychologicznej [Selected Issues in Psychometrics and Psychological Diagnostics]. Poznan: UAM.Google Scholar

  • Brzeziński, J., Gaul, M., Hornowska, E., Jaworowska, A., Machowski, A., & Zakrzewska, M. (2004). Skala Inteligencji D. Wechslera dla Dorosłych. Wersja Zrewidowana - renormalizacja WAIS-R(PL) [The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised. Re-Normalisation of the WAIS-R(PL)]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Christensen, H., MacKinnon, A.J., Lorten, A.E., Jorm, A.F., Henderson, A.S., Jacomb, P., & Rodgers, B. (1999). An analysis of diversity in the cognitive performance of olderly community dwellers: Individual diff erences in change scores as a function of age. Psychological Aging, 14 (3), 365-379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test CVLT. Research Edition. Adult Version. Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

  • Fama, R., Sullivan, E.V., Shear, P.K., Cahn-Weiner, D.A., Yesavage, J.A., Tinklenberg, J.R., & Pfeff erbaum, A. (1998). Fluency Performance Patterns in Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12 (4), 487-499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fernandez, A.L., & Marcopulos, B. (2008). A comparison of normative data for the Trail Making Test from several countries: Equivalence of norms and considerations for interpretation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49 (3), 239-246.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Goryńska, E. (2005). Przymiotnikowa Skala Nastroju UMACL. Podręcznik [The UMACL Manual]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Jaworowska, A. (2002). Test Sortowania Kart z Wisconsin. Podręcznik [The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Jaworowska, A. & Szustrowa, T. (2000). Test Matryc Ravena w wersji Standard. Formy: Klasyczna, Równoległa, Plus. Polskie standaryzacje. [The Raven Progressive Matrices - Standard. Classic, Parallel and Plus Forms. Polish Standardisations]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Jones-Gotman, M. & Milner, B. (1977). Design fl uency: The invention of nonsense drawings aft er focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 15 (4-5), 653-674.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kądzielawa, D., Mroziak, J., Bolewska, A., & Osiejuk, E. (1990). Podręcznik do Baterii Testów Halsteada-Reitana [The Halstead-Reitan Test Battery Manual]. Warszawa: Wydział Psychologii UW.Google Scholar

  • Kaufman, A.S., McLean, J.E., & Reynolds, C.R. (1988). Sex, race, residence, region and education diff erences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44 (2), 231-248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lancioni, G.E., O’Reilly, M.F., Campodonico, F., & Mantini, M. (2001). Promoting performance fl uency in a person with profound intellectual disability and blindness. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29 (3), 373-377.Google Scholar

  • Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Loring, D.W., Hannay, H.J., & Fischer, J.S. (2004). Neuropsychological Assessment. Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Łojek, E. (2001). Neuropsychologia osób zakazonych wirusem HIV i chorych na AIDS [The Neuropsychology of HIV-Infected Individuals and AIDS Patients]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Medyk.Google Scholar

  • Łojek, E. & Bornstein, R.A. (2005). The stability of neurocognitive patterns in HIV infected men: Classification considerations. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27 (6), 665-682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Łojek, E. & Stańczak, J. (2005). Test Płynności Figuralnej Ruff a. Polska standaryzacja i normalizacja. Podręcznik [The Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Polish Standarisation and Normalisation]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Łojek, E. & Stańczak, J. (2009). Kalifornijski Test Uczenia się Językowego (CVLT).Google Scholar

  • Polska normalizacja [The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT). Polish Normalization]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Matczak, A., Jaworowska, A., Szustrowa, T., & Ciechanowicz, A. (1995). Bateria Testów APIS-Z. Podręcznik [The APIS-Z Test Battery Manual]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.Google Scholar

  • Nęcka, E. (2000). Procesy uwagi [Attention processes]. In J. Strelau (Ed.), Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki. Psychologia ogólna. Tom 2 [Psychology.Google Scholar

  • An Academic Textbook. General Psychology. Volume 2] (pp. 77-96). Gdańsk: GWP.Google Scholar

  • OECD (2004). Learning for Tomorrow’s World - First Results from PISA 2003. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf [15.04.2007].Google Scholar

  • Regard, M., Strauss, E., Knapp, P. (1982). Children’s production on verbal and non-verbal fl uency tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55 (3), 839-844.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej [Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland] (2002). Warszawa: Zakład Wydawnictw Statystycznych.Google Scholar

  • Ross, T.P., Foard, E.L., Hiott, F.B., & Vincent, A. (2003). The reliability of production strategy scores for the Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18 (8), 879-891.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosselli, M. & Ardila, A. (2003). The impact of culture and education on non-verbal neuropsychological measurements: A critical review. Brain and Cognition, 52 (3), 326-333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruff , R.M. (1996). Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Professional Manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

  • Ruff , R.M., Allen, C.C., Farrow, C.E., Niemann, H., & Wylie, T. (1994). Figural fl uency: Diff erential impairment in patients with left versus right frontal lobe lesions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9 (1), 41-55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruff , R.M., Evans, R.W., & Lawrence, F.M. (1986). Impaired verbal and figural fl uency aft er head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1 (2), 87-101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruff , R.M., Light, R.H., & Evans, R.W. (1987). The Ruff Figural Fluency Test: A normative study with adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3 (1), 37-51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ruff , R.M., Light, R.H., Parker, S.B., & Levin, H.S. (1997). The psychological construct of word fl uency. Brain and Language, 57 (3), 394-405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sabe, L., Jason, L., Juejati, M., Leiguarda, R., & Starkstein, S. (1993). Sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Mental State Exam in the diagnosis of dementia. Behavioural Neurology, 6 (4), 207-210. PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sands, K.A. (1998). Nonverbal fl uency: A neuropsychometric investigation. Dissertation Abstracts International. Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 58 (8-B), 4470.Google Scholar

  • Schretlen, D.J., Munro, C.A., Anthony, J.C., & Pearlson, G.D. (2003). Examining the range of normal intraindividual variability in neuropsychological test performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9 (6), 864-870.Google Scholar

  • Spreen, O. & Strauss, E. (1998). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Administration, Norms, and Commentary. Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sternberg, R.J., & Wagner, R.K. (Eds.) (1986). Practical Intelligence: Nature and Origins of Competence in the Everyday World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Suchy, Y., Sands, K., & Chelune, G.J. (2003). Verbal and nonverbal fl uency performance before and aft er seizure. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25 (2), 190-200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williamson, J.B., & Harrison, D.W. (2003). Functional cerebral asymmetry in hostility: A dual task approach with fl uency and cardiovascular regulation. Brain and Cognition, 52 (2), 167-174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2015-05-29

Published in Print: 2015-05-01

Citation Information: Psychology of Language and Communication, Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 58–76, ISSN (Online) 2083-8506, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/plc-2015-0005.

Export Citation

© by Emilia Łojek. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in