Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

4 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2299-0984
See all formats and pricing
More options …

A Framework for the Game-theoretic Analysis of Censorship Resistance

Tariq Elahi
  • Corresponding author
  • KU Leuven
  • Email:
/ John A. Doucette
  • University of Waterloo
  • Email:
/ Hadi Hosseini
  • University of Waterloo
  • Email:
/ Steven J. Murdoch
  • University College London
  • Email:
/ Ian Goldberg
  • University of Waterloo
  • Email:
Published Online: 2016-07-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2016-0030

Abstract

We present a game-theoretic analysis of optimal solutions for interactions between censors and censorship resistance systems (CRSs) by focusing on the data channel used by the CRS to smuggle clients’ data past the censors. This analysis leverages the inherent errors (false positives and negatives) made by the censor when trying to classify traffic as either non-circumvention traffic or as CRS traffic, as well as the underlying rate of CRS traffic. We identify Nash equilibrium solutions for several simple censorship scenarios and then extend those findings to more complex scenarios where we find that the deployment of a censorship apparatus does not qualitatively change the equilibrium solutions, but rather only affects the amount of traffic a CRS can support before being blocked. By leveraging these findings, we describe a general framework for exploring and identifying optimal strategies for the censorship circumventor, in order to maximize the amount of CRS traffic not blocked by the censor. We use this framework to analyze several scenarios with multiple data-channel protocols used as cover for the CRS. We show that it is possible to gain insights through this framework even without perfect knowledge of the censor’s (secret) values for the parameters in their utility function.

References

  • [1] T. Alpcan and T. Ba¸sar. Network Security: A Decision and Game-Theoretic Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

  • [2] R. Anderson and T. Moore. The Economics of Information Security. Science, 314(5799):610-613, 2006.Google Scholar

  • [3] R. Anderson, T. Moore, S. Nagaraja, and A. Ozment. Incentives and Information Security. Algorithmic Game Theory, pages 633-649, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [4] R. J. Aumann. Acceptable Points in General Cooperative n-Person Games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 4:287-324, 1959.Google Scholar

  • [5] D. Blackwell. Discounted dynamic programming. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36(1):226-235, 1965.Google Scholar

  • [6] F. Brandt, T. Sandholm, and Y. Shoham. Spiteful bidding in sealed-bid auctions. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, IJCAI’07, pages 1207-1214, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2007. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

  • [7] C. Brubaker, A. Houmansadr, and V. Shmatikov. CloudTransport: Using Cloud Storage for Censorship-Resistant Networking. In Proceedings of 14th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium. Springer, 2014.Google Scholar

  • [8] J. R. Crandall, D. Zinn, M. Byrd, E. T. Barr, and R. East. ConceptDoppler: A Weather Tracker for Internet Censorship. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 352-365, 2007.Google Scholar

  • [9] G. Danezis. An anomaly-based censorship detection system for Tor. Technical Report 2011-09-001, The Tor Project, 2011. https://research.torproject.org/techreports/detector-2011-09-09.pdf.Google Scholar

  • [10] G. Danezis and R. Anderson. The Economics of Censorship Resistance. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Workship on Economics and Information Security, 2004.Google Scholar

  • [11] R. Dingledine. Obfsproxy: The Next Step in the Censorship Arms Race. Tor Blog, https://blog.torproject.org/blog/obfsproxy-next-step-censorship-arms-race, February 2012. Retrieved May 2015.Google Scholar

  • [12] R. Dingledine, N. Mathewson, and P. Syverson. Tor: The Second-Generation Onion Router. In Proceedings of the 13th conference on USENIX Security Symposium-Volume 13, pages 303-320. USENIX Association, 2004.Google Scholar

  • [13] K. P. Dyer, S. E. Coull, T. Ristenpart, and T. Shrimpton. Protocol Misidentification Made Easy with Format-Transforming Encryption. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 2013.Google Scholar

  • [14] F. Fang, P. Stone, and M. Tambe. Defender strategies in domains involving frequent adversary interaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 1663-1664. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015.Google Scholar

  • [15] D. Fifield, C. Lan, R. Hynes, P. Wegmann, and V. Paxson. Blocking-resistant Communication through Domain Fronting. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2015(2):46-64, June 2015.Google Scholar

  • [16] A. Filasto and J. Applebaum. OONI: Open Observatory of Network Interference. In Proceedings of the USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet. USENIX, 2012.Google Scholar

  • [17] D. Fudenberg and E. Maskin. The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica, 54(3):533-554, 1986.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] J. Geddes, M. Schuchard, and N. Hopper. Cover Your ACKs: Pitfalls of Covert Channel Censorship Circumvention. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2013.Google Scholar

  • [19] B. Hahn, R. Nithyanand, P. Gill, and R. Johnson. Games Without Frontiers: Investigating Video Games as a Covert Channel. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.05904v2.pdf, 2015. Retrieved May 2015.Google Scholar

  • [20] A. Houmansadr, T. Riedl, N. Borisov, and A. Singer. IP over Voice-over-IP for Censorship Circumvention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.2683, 2012.Google Scholar

  • [21] S. Khattak, T. Elahi, L. Simon, C. M. Swanson, S. J. Murdoch, and I. Goldberg. SoK: Making Sense of Censorship Resistance Systems. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2016(4), 2016.Google Scholar

  • [22] A. Lewman. Iran Partially Blocks Encrypted Network Traffic. Tor Blog, https://blog.torproject.org/blog/iran-partially-blocksencrypted-network-traffic, February 2012. Retrieved May 2015.Google Scholar

  • [23] K. Leyton-Brown and Y. Shoham. Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise Multidisciplinary Introduction. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 2(1):1-88, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [24] S. Li, M. Schliep, and N. Hopper. Facet: Streaming over Videoconferencing for Censorship Circumvention. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, November 2014.Google Scholar

  • [25] M. H. Manshaei, Q. Zhu, T. Alpcan, T. Bac¸sar, and J.-P. Hubaux. Game Theory meets Network Security and Privacy. ACM Computing Surveys, 45(3):25, 2013.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [26] H. Mohajeri Moghaddam, B. Li, M. Derakhshani, and I. Goldberg. SkypeMorph: Protocol Obfuscation for Tor Bridges. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security, October 2012.Google Scholar

  • [27] J. Morgan, K. Steiglitz, and G. Reis. The spite motive and equilibrium behavior in auctions. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1), 2003.Google Scholar

  • [28] M. J. Osborne. An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press New York, 2003.Google Scholar

  • [29] J. Pita, M. Jain, J. Marecki, F. Ordóñez, C. Portway, M. Tambe, C. Western, P. Paruchuri, and S. Kraus. Deployed ARMOR Protection: The Application of a Game Theoretic Model for Security at the Los Angeles International Airport. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Industrial Track, pages 125-132. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [30] Psiphon Inc. Psiphon. https://psiphon.ca. Retrieved May 2015.Google Scholar

  • [31] S. Roy, C. Ellis, S. Shiva, D. Dasgupta, V. Shandilya, and Q. Wu. A Survey of Game Theory as Applied to Network Security. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pages 1-10. IEEE, 2010.Google Scholar

  • [32] Sandvine. Global Internet Phenomena Report - Spotlight encrypted Internet traffic. https://www.sandvine.com/downloads/general/globalinternet-phenomena/2016/global-internet-phenomenaspotlight-encrypted-internet-traffic.pdf.Google Scholar

  • [33] Y. Shoham and K. Leyton-Brown. Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

  • [34] T. Tor Project. Tor Mertics Portal: Bridge users by country. https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-bridge-country.html, 2016. Retrieved May 2016.Google Scholar

  • [35] M. C. Tschantz, S. Afroz, V. Paxson, and J. Tygar. On Modeling the Costs of Censorship. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.3211, 2014.Google Scholar

  • [36] P. Vines and T. Kohno. Rook: Using Video Games as a Low- Bandwidth Censorship Resistant Communication Platform. http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~yoshi/papers/tech-reportrook.pdf, 2015. Retrieved May 2015.Google Scholar

  • [37] VPN Gate. VPN Gate Latest Activity Logs. http://www.vpngate.net/en/lastlog.aspx, 2016. Retrieved May 2016.Google Scholar

  • [38] Q. Wang, X. Gong, G. T. K. Nguyen, A. Houmansadr, and N. Borisov. CensorSpoofer: Asymmetric Communication using IP Spoofing for Censorship-Resistant Web Browsing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security, October 2012.Google Scholar

  • [39] Z. Weinberg, J. Wang, V. Yegneswaran, L. Briesemeister, S. Cheung, F. Wang, and D. Boneh. StegoTorus: A Camouflage Proxy for the Tor Anonymity System. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer and Communications Security, October 2012. Google Scholar

  • [40] J. Wright, A. Darer, and O. Farnan. Detecting Internet Filtering from Geographic Time Series. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1507.05819v1.pdf, July 2015. Retrieved August 2015.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2016-02-29

Revised: 2016-06-02

Accepted: 2016-06-02

Published Online: 2016-07-14

Published in Print: 2016-10-01


Citation Information: Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, ISSN (Online) 2299-0984, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/popets-2016-0030.

Export Citation

© 2016. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in