Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.151
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.186
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.144

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1641-7844
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 42, Issue 1 (Jan 2011)

Issues

Motherland under attack! Nationalism, terrorist threat, and support for the restriction of civil liberties

Maciej Sekerdej
  • Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, ul. Mickiewicza 3, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
/ Małgorzata Kossowska
  • Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, ul. Mickiewicza 3, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
Published Online: 2011-12-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-011-0003-0

Motherland under attack! Nationalism, terrorist threat, and support for the restriction of civil liberties

The paper addresses the role which national attitudes play in terrorist threat perception and in the choice of specific counterterrorism strategies. Study 1 shows that participants higher on nationalism tend to perceive the threat of terrorism as more serious than participants lower on nationalism. Moreover, we found that nationalism mediated the relationship between the perceived terrorist threat and the support for tough domestic policies, even at the expense of considerable limitation of civil liberties. Study 2 confirms the link between the perceived terrorism threat and the support for suspension of civil liberties. Nevertheless, when terrorism was seen in terms of crime rather than in terms of war, the mediating role of nationalism disappeared. The results contribute to a better understanding of the process whereby the perception of one's own national group and the perception of one's own nation-state translate into specific reactions triggered by external threats.

Keywords: national attitudes; terrorist threat; restrictions of civil liberties; perception of terrorism as war; perception of terrorism as crime

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. [Crossref] [PubMed]

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Labin, D. (2001). The effect of a major event on stereotyping: terrorist attacks in Israel and Israeli adolescents' perceptions of Palestinians, Jordanians and Arabs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 265-280.

  • Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its discontents. New York: New York University Press.

  • Blank, T., & Schmidt, P. (2003). National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology, 24, 289-312. [Crossref]

  • Chanley, V. A. (2002). Trust in government in the aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and consequences. Political Psychology, 23(3), 469-483. [Crossref]

  • Citrin, J., Wong, C., & Duff, B. (2001). The meaning of American national identity: Patterns of ethnic conflict and consensus. Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction. Rutgers series on self and social identity; vol. 3, 71-100.

  • Cohrs, J. C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., & Kielmann, S. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425-1434. [Crossref]

  • Crenshaw, M. (1990/1998). The logic of terrorism: Terrorist behavior as a product of strategic choice. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind (pp. 7-24). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

  • Crowson, H., DeBacker, T. & Thoma, S. (2006). The role of authoritarianism, perceived threat, and need for closure or structure in predicting post-9/11: Attitudes and beliefs. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 733-750.

  • Davis, D., & Silver, B. (2004). Civil liberties vs security In the context of the terrorist attacks on Amarica. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 28-46. [Crossref]

  • Dekker, H., Malova, D., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2003). Nationalism and Its Explanations. Political Psychology, 24(2), 345-376. [Crossref]

  • Duckitt, J. (1989). Authoritarianism and group identification: A new view of an old construct. Political Psychology, 10(1), 63-84. [Crossref]

  • Echebarria-Echabe, A., & Fernandez-Guede, E. (2005). Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 259-265.

  • Federico, C., Golec, A., & Dial, J. (2005). The relationship between need for closure and support for military action against Iraq: Moderating effects of national attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 621-632. [Crossref]

  • Florian, V., Miculincer, M. & Hirschberger, G. (2002). The Anxiety-Buffering Function of Close Relationships : Evidence That Relationship Commitment Acts as a Terror Management Mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 527-542. [PubMed] [Crossref]

  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Goodwin, R., Willson, M., & Gaines, S. (2005). Terror threat perception and its consequences in contemporary Britain. British Journal f Psychology, 96, 389-406. [Crossref]

  • Heaven, P., Rajab, D., & Ray, J. (1985). Patriotism, racism, an the disutility of the ethnocentrism concept. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 181-185. [Crossref]

  • Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In: D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Capelos, T., & Provost, C. (2002). The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology, 23(3), 485-509. [Crossref]

  • Huddy, L., Khatib, N., & Capelos, T. (2002). The polls-trends: Reactions to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 418-450. [Crossref]

  • Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Jahav, G. (2005). Threat, Anxiety, and Support of Antiterrorism Policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593-608. [Crossref]

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375. [Crossref] [PubMed]

  • Joyner, C. (2004). The United Nations and terrorism: Rethinking legal tensions between national security, human rights and civil liberties. International Studies Perspectives, 5, 240-257. [Crossref]

  • Kossowska, M., Golec de Zavala, A., Sekerdej, M., & Kubik, T. (2010). Psychological determinants and consequences of terrorism threat perception. In D. Antonius, A. D. Brown, T. K. Walters, J. M. Ramirez, and S. J. Sinclair (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Analyses of Terrorism (pp.71-100). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

  • Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257-274. [Crossref]

  • Kruglanski, A. W., & Fishman, S. (2006). The psychology of terrorism: "Syndrome" versus "tool" perspectives. Journal of Terrorism and Political Violence, 18, 69-82.

  • Kruglanski, A. W., Chen, X., Dechesne, M., Fishman, S., & Orehek, E. (2009). Fully Committed: Suicide Bombers' Motivation and the Quest for Personal Significance. Political Psychology, 30, 331-357. [Crossref]

  • Kruglanki, A. W., Crenshaw, M., Post, J. M., & Victoroff, J. (2007). What should this fight be called? Metaphors of counterterrorism and their implications. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 97-133. [Crossref]

  • Leyens, J., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J. F., Fiske, S. T., Gaunt, R., et al. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism: The 2002 Tajfel Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 703-717. [Crossref]

  • Li, Q., & Brewer, M. B. (2004). What Does It Mean to Be an American? Patriotism, Nationalism, and American Identity After 9/11. Political Psychology, 25(5), 727-739. [Crossref]

  • Mandel, D. R., & Dhami, M. K. (2005). ‘What I did’ versus ‘what I might have done’: Effect of factual versus counterfactual thinking on blame, guilt, and shame in prisoners. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(6), 627-635. [Crossref]

  • McCauley, C. (2004). Psychological Issues in Understanding Terrorism and the Response to Terrorism. In: C. Stout (ed.), Psychology of terrorism: Coping with the continuing threat, condensed edition (pp. 33-65). Westport, CT, US: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • McCauley, C. (2006). Jujitsu politics: Terrorism and response to terrorism. In P. R. Kimmel & C. E. Stout (Eds.), Collateral damage: The psychological consequences of America's war on terrorism (pp. 45-65). Westport, CT: Praeger.

  • McCauley, C. (2007). War versus justice in response to terrorist attacks: Competing frames and their implications. In B. Bongar, Brown, L. M., Beutler, L. E., Brackenridge & P. G. Zimbardo (Eds.). Psychology of terrorism. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • McFarland, S. & Mathews, M. (2005). Who cares about human rights? Political Psychology, 26, 365-385. [Crossref]

  • Michnik, A. (2009). Dyskretny urok terroryzmu [The discreet charm of terrorism]. In J. Bocheński (Ed.), Krwawe przysmaki włoskie (pp. 1-8). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo gazety Wyborczej.

  • Mikulincer, M., Florian, V. & Hirschberger, G. (2003). The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 7, 20-40.

  • Moghadam, A. 2003; Palestinian suicide terrorism in the Second Intifada: Motivations and organizational aspects. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 26, 65-92.

  • Moghadam. F. M. (2005). The staircase to terrorism: a psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60, 161-169. [Crossref]

  • Moskalenko, S., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2006). Group Identification under Conditions of Threat: College Students' Attachment to Country, Family, Ethnicity, Religion, and University Before and After September 11, 2001. Political Psychology, 27(1), 77-97. [Crossref]

  • Norris, P. Kern, M. & Just, M. (2003). Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public. New York: Routledge.

  • Paez Rovira, D., Martinez-Sanchez, F., & Rime, B. (2004). Los effectos del compartimento social de las emociones sobre la trauma del 11 de Marzo en personas no afectadas directamente. Ansiedad y Estres, 10, 219-232.

  • Pick, T. M. (1997). Eastern European militant nationalism: Some causes and measures to counteract it. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 3(4), 383-393. [Crossref]

  • Podolski, A. (2004). Bezpieczeństwo europejskie po Madrycie z polskiej perspektywy [European security after Madrit from polish perspective]. Raport Centrum Stosunków Międzynarodowych, Nr 6/04. Warszawa, CSM.

  • Pronin, E., Kennedy, K. & Butsch, S. (2006). Bombing versus negotiating: how preferences for combating terrorism are affected by perceived terrorist rationality. Basic And Applied Social Psychology, 28, 385-392. [Crossref]

  • Sidanius, J., & Petrocik, J. R. (2001). Communal and national identity in a multiethnic state: A comparison of three perspectives. Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction., Rutgers series on self and social identity;; vol. 3, 101-129.

  • Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Schatz, R. & Staub, E. (1997). Manifestations of blind and constructive patriotism: Personality correlates and individual-group relations. In: D. Bar-Tal and E. Staub (eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 229-245). Chicago, IL, US: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

  • Schatz, R. T., Staub, E., & Lavine, H. (1999). On the varieties of national attachment: Blind versus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology, 20(1), 151-174. [Crossref]

  • Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levine, S. & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102-133. [Crossref]

  • Somer, E., Tamir, E., Maguen, S., & Litz, B. (2005). Brief cognitive-behavioral phone-based intervention targeting anxiety about the threat of attack: a pilot study. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 43, 669-679.

  • Staub, E. (1997). Blind versus constructive patriotism: Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action. In D. Bar-Tal and E. Staub (eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 213-228). Chicago, IL, US: Nelson-Hall Publishers.

  • Śmieja, M., Kałaska, M., & Adamczyk, M. (2006). Scared to death or scared to love? Terror management theory and close relationships seeking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 279-296. [Crossref]

  • Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Findler, L., & Miculincer, M. (2002). The effects of mortality salience on relationship strivings and beliefs: The moderating role of attachment style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 419-442. [Crossref]

  • Webster's Dictionary (2008). War. Retrieved September 13, 2008, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/war

  • Zimbardo, P. (2003). Overcoming terror. Retrieved February 2, 2004 from http://www.psychologytoday.com/htdocs/prod/ptoarticle/pto-20030724-000000.asp

About the article


Published Online: 2011-12-19

Published in Print: 2011-01-01



Citation Information: Polish Psychological Bulletin, ISSN (Print) 0079-2993, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-011-0003-0. Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in