Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Polish Psychological Bulletin

The Journal of Committee for Psychological Sciences of Polish Academy of Sciences

4 Issues per year


CiteScore 2016: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.185
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.258

Open Access
Online
ISSN
1641-7844
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 43, Issue 4 (Dec 2012)

Issues

Styles of behaviour in interpersonal conflict concept and research tool (Conflict behaviour questionnaire).

Krystyna Balawajder
Published Online: 2012-12-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-012-0026-1

Abstract

The article presents the main types of conflict behaviour with the author’s proposal of their classification. The suggested classification is based on the way in which an individual deals with a partner’s adverse influence on his/her self-interest and welfare in a conflict situation. Four possible ways of coping i.e. attack, amicable settlement, defence, and yielding have been distinguished. On the basis of this behaviour classification, the Conflict Behaviour Questionnaire was compiled and its reliability and validity was assessed.

Keywords : Interpersonal conflict; conflict behaviour; attack; amicable settlement; defence; yielding

  • Balawajder, K. (1998). Komunikacja, konflikty, negocjacje w organizacji (Communication, conflicts, negotiation in organizations). Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego. Google Scholar

  • Balawajder, K. (1995). Interpersonal conflict: internal syndrome, PolishPsychological Bulletin, Vol. 26(1), 19-30. Google Scholar

  • Balawajder, K. (1992). Konflikty interpersonalne: analiza psychologiczna (Interpersonal conflicts: psychological analysis). Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego Google Scholar

  • Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S. (1964). The managerial grid, Houston. Texas: Gulf Publishing. Google Scholar

  • Deutsch, M. 1994: Constructive conflict resolution: principles, training, and research. Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 50, No. 1, 2, 13-3 Google Scholar

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar

  • Horney, K., (1994): Nasze wewnętrzne konflikty. (Our inner conflicts). Poznań, Poland: Rebis Dom Wydawniczy Horney, K., (1976): Neurotyczna osobowość naszych czasów (The neurotic personality of our time). Warszawa, Poland: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe Google Scholar

  • Kolb, D., Putnam, L.L. (1992). The multiple faces of conflict in organizations, Journal of Organization Behaviour, Vol. 13, 311-324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peterson, D.R. 1983: Conflict. In H.H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J.H. Harvey, T.L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, A.L. Peplau, D.R. Peterson (Eds.), Close Relation-ships (pp. 360-396). New York: Freeman and Company Google Scholar

  • Pruitt, D. G., Rubin, J.Z. (1986): Social conflicts. Escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: Random House Google Scholar

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis and suggestions for the future. AnnualReview of Psychology, 28, 363-392. Google Scholar

  • Putnam, L.L., Wilson, C.E. (1982): Communication strategies in organizational conflicts: reliability and validity of a measurement scale. In M. Burgoon, N.E. Doran (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 6 (pp. 629-632). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Google Scholar

  • Rahim, M.A. (red.) (1990), Theory and research in conflict management. New York, Westport, Connecticut, London: Prager. Google Scholar

  • Rahim, M. A. (1983): A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 368-376 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rapoport, A. (1970). Fights, games and debates. Ann Arbor: University Michigan Press. Google Scholar

  • Rosenzweig, S. (1944). An outline of frustration theory, In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the Behaviour Disorders (pp. 379-388). Oxford, England: Ronald Press Google Scholar

  • Rubin, J.Z., Pruitt, D.G., Kim, S.H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and Settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar

  • Thomas, K.W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation processes in organizational psychology. In .D. Dunnette, L.M., Hough M. (Eds.), Handbook ofindustrial and organizational Psychology (pp. 651-717). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press, Thomas, K.W. (1976): Conflict and conflict management. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook ofindustrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889-935). Chicago, Rand McNally, Thomas, K., Kilmann, R. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Tuxerdo, NY: Xicom, Incorporated Google Scholar

  • Thomas, K., Pondy, L.R., 1977: Toward an “intent” model of conflict management among principal parties. Human Relations, Vol. 30, No. 12. Google Scholar

  • Tjosvold, D. (1990): The goal interdependence. Approach to communication in conflict: an organizational study. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Theory and research in conflict management (pp. 15-27). New York: Prager Google Scholar

  • Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex Interpersonal Conflict Behaviour: Theoretical Frontiers. Google Scholar

  • London: Psychology Press. Google Scholar

  • Wall, J., Callister, R. (1995). Conflict and its management, Journal ofManagement, 21, 515-558Google Scholar

About the article

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Krystyna Balawajder, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty in Katowice, Kossutha 9, 40-844 Katowice, Poland. e-mail: krystyna.balawajder@swps.edu.pl


Published Online: 2012-12-14

Published in Print: 2012-12-01


Citation Information: Polish Psychological Bulletin, ISSN (Print) 0079-2993, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-012-0026-1.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in