Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Politeness Research

Language, Behaviour, Culture

Ed. by Grainger, Karen

2 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.365

CiteScore 2017: 1.65

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.585
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.848

Online
ISSN
1613-4877
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Face(t)s of self and identity in interaction

Derek Bousfield
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Languages, Information and Communications, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Geoffrey Manton Building, Rosamond Street West United Kingdom,
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2018-07-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0014

Abstract

Combining (meta-)theoretical extension and practical application of models of politeness, the collected works of this special edition promise to make a significant and lasting contribution to the field as well as signalling an important milestone in interactional and pragmatics research more generally. Focussed to a greater or lesser extent on the ‘impact’ of the research on the social, occupational, or legal world around us, the collected papers here are all in effect ‘interventionist’ (cf. Antaki 2011: 8). That is, the collected works of this special edition, whether dealing with remote interactions via a call centre (Jagodzinski and Archer, [this volume]; Harrington, [this volume]), or face-to-face interaction via an appraisal or a business meeting (Archer and Willcox, [this volume]; Chan et al., [this volume]), and quite irrespective of the varying approaches to (im)politeness they take, all contribute precisely to the need for further refinement, development and empirical study which Haugh (2018) wisely advocates in his recent appeal for metatheorization in politeness work. To this end, this paper argues for the evident directions and potential applicability of future metatheorizing for (im)politeness research exploring and suggesting collocated consideration of notions of face, identity and politeness in a wider notion - in interactional studies - of ‘self’.

Keywords: face; identity; impact; [im]politeness; self

References

  • Antaki, Charles. 2011. Six kinds of applied conversation analysis. In Charles Antaki (ed.). Applied conversation analysis. 1-14. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • Arundale, Robert. 2010. Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42. 2078-2105.Google Scholar

  • Archer, Dawn. 2008. Verbal aggression and impoliteness: Related or synonymous? In Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power and Theory in Practice. 181-209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Archer, Dawn & Phil Wilcox. (this issue). The faces at play in performance appraisals with a focus upon a UK retail organization. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture.Google Scholar

  • Bannister, Jon & Anthony O’Sullivan. 2013. Civility, Community Cohesion and Antisocial Behaviour: Policy and Social Harmony. Journal of Social Policy 42(1). 91-110.Google Scholar

  • Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

  • Bousfield, Derek. 2007. Beginnings, middles and ends: a biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics 39(12). 2185-2216.Google Scholar

  • Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Bousfield, Derek. 2013. Face in conflict. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1). 37-57.Google Scholar

  • Bousfield, Derek & Dan McIntyre. (2018). Creative linguistic impoliteness as aggression in Stanley Kubrick’s Full Metal Jacket. Journal of Literary Semantics. 10.1515/jls-2018-0003.Google Scholar

  • Boyd, Richard. 2006. The Value of Civility? Urban Studies 43(5-6). 863-878.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Buckley, Paul. 2017. Violence at work, 2015/16 Findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales and from RIDDOR [online] http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causinj/violence/violence-at-work.pdf (Accessed 22 March 2018).Google Scholar

  • Burnett, Paul C. & Andrea R. McCrindle. 1999. The relationship between significant others’ positive and negative statements, self talk and self-esteem. Child Study Journal 29(1). 39-48.Google Scholar

  • Buss, Sarah. 1999. Appearing Respectful: The Moral Significance of Manners. Ethics 109(4). 795-826.Google Scholar

  • Calhoun, Cheshire. 2000. The Virtue of Civility. Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(3). 251-275.Google Scholar

  • Carter, Stephen L. 1998. Civility: Manners, Morals, and the Etiquette of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Coleman, Linda & Paul Kay. 1981. Prototype Semantics: The English Word Lie. Language 57(1). 26-44.Google Scholar

  • Chan, Angela, Stephanie Schnurr & Olga Zayts. (this volume.) Exploring face, identity and relationship management in disagreements in business meetings in Hong Kong. Journal of Politeness Research Language, Behaviour, Culture.Google Scholar

  • Crime and Courts Act. 2013. UK Parliament: Hansard. [online] Available at http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/22/contents/enacted (Accessed 23 April 2018)Google Scholar

  • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act. 1994. UK Parliament: Hansard. [online] Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/contents (Accessed 23 April 2018)Google Scholar

  • Culpeper Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349-367.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and Characterisation. People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield & Anne Wichmann. 2003. Impoliteness Revisited: The special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35(10-11). 1545-1579.Google Scholar

  • Edyvane, Derek. 2017. The Passion for Civility. Political Studies Review 15(3). 344-354.Google Scholar

  • Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Garces-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. Face, identity and (im)politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 9(1). 1-33.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1955. On Face-work. An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 18(3). 213-231.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behaviour. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

  • Hamilton, Mark A. 2011. Verbal Aggression: Understanding the Psychological Antecedents and Social Consequences. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31(1). 5-12.Google Scholar

  • Harrington, Leigh. (this volume.) “Helping you to pay us” Rapport management in debt collection call centre encounters. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture.Google Scholar

  • Haugh, Michael. 2018. Theorizing (im)politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 14 (1). 153-165.Google Scholar

  • Health and Safety Executive. 2017. Violence at Work, 2015/16: Findings from the Crime Survey for England and Wales from RIDDOR. Health and Safety Executive. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causinj/violence/violence-at-work.pdf (Accessed 29 March 2018)Google Scholar

  • Home Office. 2003. Respect and Responsibility - Taking a Stand Against Anti-Social Behaviour. Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

  • Jagodzinski, Piotr & Dawn Archer. (this volume.) Co-creating customer experience through call centre interaction Interactional achievement and professional face. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture.Google Scholar

  • Joseph, John. 2013. Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 9(1). 35-54.Google Scholar

  • Kristjánsson, Kristján. 2006. Agreeableness. Journal of Value Inquiry 40. 33-43.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. Politeness: is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 3(2). 167-206.Google Scholar

  • Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. Activity Types and language. In: Paul Drew & John Heritage (eds.). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. 66-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Levy, Jacob T. 2010. Multicultural Manners. In: Michel Seymour (ed.) The Plural States of Recognition. 61-77. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar

  • Loh, Jennifer, Flora Calleja & Simon Lloyd Restubog. 2010. Words that hurt: A qualitative study of Parental Verbal Abuse in the Philippines. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(11). 2244-2263.Google Scholar

  • Manderino, Mary A., & Neva Berkey. 1997. Verbal Abuse of staff nurses by physicians. Journal of Professional Nursing 13(1). 48-55.Google Scholar

  • National Audit Office. 2003. A Safer Place to Work: Improving the management of health and safety risks to staff in NHS trusts. HC 623 Session 2002-2003. [online] Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2003/04/0203623.pdf (Accessed 23 April 2018)Google Scholar

  • Protection from Harassment Act. 1997. UK Parliament: Hansard. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1997/40/contents (Accessed 23 April 2018)Google Scholar

  • Public Order Act. 1986. UK Parliament: Hansard. [online] Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/64 (Accessed 23 April 2018)Google Scholar

  • Scollon, Ron & Suzanne Wong Scollon. 2001. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Scottish Government. 2009. Promoting Positive Outcomes: Working Together to Prevent Antisocial Behaviour in Scotland. Volumes 1 and 2, Edinburgh: Scottish Government.Google Scholar

  • Smith, Philio, Timothy L. Phillips, Ryan D. King. 2010. Incivility: The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tajfel, Henri. 1978. Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In: Henri Tajfel (ed.) Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the social psychology of Intergroup Relations. 61-76. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness and rudeness. In: Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. 45-74. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Wee, Lionel. 2004. ‘Extreme Communicative Acts’ and the boosting of illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 36(12). 2161-2178.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-07-05

Published in Print: 2018-07-26


Citation Information: Journal of Politeness Research, Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 225–243, ISSN (Online) 1613-4877, ISSN (Print) 1612-5681, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0014.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in