Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Politeness Research

Language, Behaviour, Culture

Ed. by Grainger, Karen


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.652
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.667

CiteScore 2018: 1.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.785
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.150

Online
ISSN
1613-4877
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Impoliteness in English and Chinese online diners’ reviews

Xiaoyu Lai
  • Corresponding author
  • Guangdong University of Technology - School of Foreign Languages Panyu District Guangzhou China
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2019-06-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0031

Abstract

Linguistic impoliteness appears to be an important feature of online reviews. This paper examines how impoliteness is realized in English and Chinese negative reviews, and how these reviews are responded to. The data sets are composed of 32 English and 32 Chinese negative reviews with responses respectively from the websites TripAdvisor and Dazhongdianping. Building on the work of Culpeper (1996; 2011), English reviewers are found to adopt more of a mixture of approval and criticism, and “stuff-oriented” pointed complaints, while Chinese reviewers employ more indignant exclamations and “staff-oriented” pointed complaints. This suggests that the latter are more concerned about their own face needs, and thus have the potential to be perceived as more impolite and aggravating than the former. However, it is also found that Chinese respondents are potentially more polite and indirect than English respondents. Chinese respondents pay more attention to reviewers’ face wants rather than that of their own, while English respondents attach greater importance to maintaining a positive image for a restaurant, and hence attending to their own face needs. This paper reveals a sharp contrast in the use of impoliteness and its link to the concept of face in English and Chinese negative reviews and responses.

Keywords: impoliteness; face; negative reviews; responses

References

  • Arundale, Robert B. 2006. Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2(2). 193-217.Google Scholar

  • Bou-Franch, Patricia & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. Conflict management in massive polylogues: a case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics 73. 19-36.Google Scholar

  • Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Bridges, Judith & Camilla Vásquez. 2016. If nearly all Airbnb reviews are positive, does that make them meaningless? Current Issues in Tourism 19. 1-19.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cheng, Winnie & Martin Warren. 2004. Indirectness, inexplicitness and vagueness made clearer. Journal of Pragmatics 13. 381-400.Google Scholar

  • Chik, Alice & Camilla Vásquez. 2016. A comparative multimodal analysis of restaurant reviews from two geographical contexts. Visual Communication 16(1). 3-26.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Cockrum, Jim. 2011. Free Marketing: 101 Low and No-Cost Ways to Grow Your Business, Online and Off. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

  • Craig, Robert T., Karen Tracy. & Frances Spisak. 1986. The discourse of requests: assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research 12. 437-468.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349-367.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 35-72.Google Scholar

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Politeness and Impoliteness. In Karin Aijmer & Gisle Andersen (eds.), Sociopragmatics (Vol. 5). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

  • Han, Chung-hey. 2002. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112(3). 201-229.Google Scholar

  • Haugh, Michael. 2010. When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 6(1). 7-31.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • He, Ming & Shaojie Zhang. 2011. Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a face-sensitive perspective: A case study of a modern Chinese TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics 43(9). 2360-2372.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Heritage, Janet. 2002. The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10-11). 1427-1446.Google Scholar

  • Ho, Victor. 2017a. Achieving service recovery through responding to negative online reviews. Discourse & Communication 11(1). 31-50.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, Victor. 2017b. Giving offense and making amends: How hotel management attempts to manage rapport with dissatisfied customers. Journal of Pragmatics 109. 1-11.Google Scholar

  • Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra & Bernadette Vine. 2012. Politeness and impoliteness in New Zealand English workplace discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9). 1063-1076.Google Scholar

  • Homburg, Christian. & Andreas Fürst. 2007. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil: A study of defensive organizational behavior towards customer complaints. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science 35(4). 523-536.Google Scholar

  • Jiang, Wei. 2004. Peer review in ESL writing: attitudes and cultural concerns. Ball State University.Google Scholar

  • Lachenicht, Lance G. 1980. Aggravating language: a study of abusive and insulting language. International Journal of Human Communication 13(4). 607-688.Google Scholar

  • Law, Rob. 2006. Internet and tourism - Part XXI: TripAdvisor. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 20(1). 75-77.Google Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman Group Limited.Google Scholar

  • Levy, Stuart E., Wenjing Duan & Soyoung Boo. 2013. An analysis of one-star online reviews and responses in the Washington, D.C., lodging market. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 54(1). 49-63.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Locher, Miriam A. 2010. Introduction: politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 1-5.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behavior. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher. (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 77-100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Lv, Shuxiang (吕叔湘). 2002. 吕叔湘全集 第一卷 中国文法要略. [Collected works of Lv Shuxiang Vol. 1 An outline of Chinese grammar]. Shenyang: Liaoning Education Publishing House.Google Scholar

  • Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Mills, Sara. 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 4(5). 1047-1060.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mugford, Gerrard. 2012. I wouldn’t say that if I were you: Face-to-face with foreign-language impoliteness. Journal of politeness research 8(3). 195-221.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mullany, Louise. 2008. “Stop hassling me!” Impoliteness, power and gender identity in the professional workplace. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher. (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 231-330. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Neurauter-Kessels, Manuela. 2011. Im/polite reader responses on British online news sites. Journal of Politeness Research 7(2). 187-214.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2005. On complainability. Social Problems 52(4). 449-476.Google Scholar

  • Simon, Bernd. 2004. Identity in Modern Society: A Social Psychological Perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Sparks, Beverley A. & Graham L. Bradley. 2014. A ‘triple A’ typology of responding to negative consumer-generated online reviews. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 7. 1-27.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Sparks, Beverley & Liz Fredline. 2007. Providing an explanation for service failure: Context, content, and customer responses. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 31(2). 241-260.Google Scholar

  • Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4). 639-656.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Tracy, Karen & Sarah J. Tracy. 1998. Rudeness at 911: reconceptualizing face and face attack. Human Communication Research 25(2). 225-251.Google Scholar

  • Upadhyay, Shiv. R. 2010. Identity and impoliteness in computer-mediated responses. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1). 105-127.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vásquez, Camilla. 2011. Complaints online: the case of TripAdvisor. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 1707-1717.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vásquez, Camilla. 2014. The discourse of online consumer reviews. London: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC.Google Scholar

  • Vermeulen, Ivare & Daphne Seegers. 2009. Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management 30(1). 123-127.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Yukiko, Nishimura. 2010. Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online communities. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 6(1). 35-55.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Zhang, Yi & Camilla Vásquez. 2014. Hotels’ responses to online reviews: Managing consumer dissatisfaction. Discourse, Context and Media 6. 54-64.Google Scholar

About the article

Xiaoyu Lai

Xiaoyu Lai is a faculty member in the School of Foreign Languages, Guangdong University of Technology, China. Her research interests include linguistic (im)politeness, language aggression and intercultural communication.


Published Online: 2019-06-26

Published in Print: 2019-07-26


Citation Information: Journal of Politeness Research, Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 293–322, ISSN (Online) 1613-4877, ISSN (Print) 1612-5681, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0031.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in